From Pine View Farm

Mammon category archive

Facebook Frolics 0

The EFF weighs in the inimical implications on Facebook’s decision to wall off its garden from legitimate academic research. A snippet:


While Facebook claims it “do[es]n’t allow misinformation in [its] ads”, it has been hesitant to block false political ads, and it continues to provide tools that enable fringe interests to shape public debate and scam users. For example, two groups were found to be funding the majority of antivaccine ads on the platform in 2019. More recently, the U.S. Surgeon General spoke out on the platform’s role in misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic—and just this week Facebook stopped a Russian advertising agency from using the platform to spread misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines. Everyone from oil and gas companies to political campaigns has used Facebook to push their own twisted narratives and erode public discourse.

Revealing the secrets behind this surveillance-based ecosystem to public scrutiny is the first step in reclaiming our public discourse.

The Zuckerborg is the fast lane of the disinformation superhighway.

Share

The Snaring Economy 0

The EFF explains how Doordash dashed its “independent contractors’ wage slaves’ hopes of equitable remuneration by keeping them from knowing what their tips would be. A nugget:

Dashers aren’t stupid – nor are they technologically unsophisticated. Dashers made heavy use of Para, an app that inspected Doordash’s dispatch orders and let drivers preview the tips on offer before they took the job. Para allowed Dashers to act as truly independent agents who were entitled to the same information as the giant corporation that relied on their labor.

But what’s good for Dashers wasn’t good for Doordash: the company wants to fulfill orders, even if doing so means that a driver spends more on gas than they make in commissions. Hiding tip amounts from drivers allowed the company to keep drivers in the dark about which runs they should make and which ones they should decline.

That’s why Doordash changed its data-model to prevent Para from showing drivers tips. And rather than come clean about its goal of keeping drivers from knowing how much they would be paid, it made deceptive “privacy and data security” claims.

Follow the link for an explanation as to how Doordash’s claims earned the label, deceptive.

(Broken link fixed.)

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

The Zuckerborg tells researchers, “You can’t track our frolickers. That’s our shtick.”

Share

The Pusher Men 0

Via The Ring of Fire.

Share

The Fee Hand of the Market 0

Business man in front of pile of parts to potential employee:  I need someone to assemble the robot that's going to replace them.  It pays $7.25 an hour.

Click for the original image.

Share

Space Race 0

Title:  Private Rockets.  Image:  Billionaire in rocket ships flying over Earth.  From one comes a voice saying,

Click for the original image.

Share

Their Unfair Share 0

Sportswriter extraordinaire Bob Molinaro:

A pithy Twitter commentary from former CBS news anchor Dan Rather on the vanity space launches of billionaires Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson: “The space race of the 1960s was fueled by American tax payers. This space race is fueled by non-tax payers.”

Share

McConnell’s Motivator 0

Mitch McConnell, backed by Fox News, points towards a bull holding a box of Kleenex and fronted by body bags tagged

Via The Bob Cesca Show Blog.

Share

Who Funds the Voter Fraud Fraudsters? 0

Corporations who profess to protest the voter fraud fraud, among others.

Share

A Money Pit 0

PoliticalProf.

Share

Counter-Factual 0

Will Bunch notes that it has been 52 years since Americans landed on the moon–a feat made possible by science, Science, after all, is the pursuit of fact. He considers why so many Americans now reject science (think vaccines, for example). A nugget (emphasis added):

Less than a year after Apollo 11 came the first Earth Day — scientists warning that industrial progress threatened environmental destruction — and also the massacre at Kent State, amid a backlash of the so-called “silent majority” against what was happening on college campuses where many researchers are employed. Just like the lunar module, distrust in modern science was engineered by humans — billionaire industrialists who funded pro-fossil-fuel think tanks, and right-wing talk radio and later cable TV ratings seekers who mocked effete “tree huggers.”

Indeed, wealthy capitalists and the politicians who aided the backlash and rode it to victories — Richard Nixon, Spiro Agnew, Ronald Reagan — were so successful that distrust in science and the conspiracy theories that flow from that distrust now spread as virally as COVID-19 itself, among everyday folks on social media sites like Facebook. Albeit with an occasional booster shot from the most cynical media celebrities like Fox’s Tucker Carlson.

I commend his article to your attention.

Share

Space Invaders 0

David Zurawik is not impressed by rich guys getting high or by the media coverage thereof. He seems to think that it is conspicuous consumption write large. A snippet:

I was already tired of the gee-whiz coverage of Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos going into space before Branson actually went there Sunday (or, went somewhere close, depending on your definition of space).

But much of the coverage since has absolutely worn me out with its treatment of Branson as a heroic figure and his joy ride some 50 miles above earth as if it was a monumental moment in human exploration and consciousness.

Follow the link for the rest.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Antitrustworthy frolics.

Share

The Rich Are Different from You and Me, Reprise 0

Homeless man sleeping on park bench covered by newspaper with headline,

Click for the original image.

Share

The Rich Are Different from You and Me 0

They get to indulge their fantasies.

Caption:  The space between us.  Image:  Jeff Bezos, wallowing in money, in a space capsule labeled

Click to view the original image.

Share

Fringe with Benefits 0

Share

Payday 0

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette takes a long look at whether unemployment benefits keep persons from applying for jobs. In a lengthy article, they explores the pros and cons of the issue. Given all the shouting, the piece is worth a read. Here’s a bit:

What she (Rachel Deutsch, who runs a support group for restaurant workers–ed.)r hasn’t heard is that the extra $300 tacked on to each unemployment check is keeping people from looking for work.

“I have not heard a single person in our group say, ‘These benefits are great, I’m going to stay at home,’” said Ms. Deutsch, who also is the director of worker justice campaigns at the Center for Popular Democracy, a progressive advocacy organization based in New York. “They don’t want to experience the shame of being unemployed. They know that even under the best-case scenario, these benefits will not last forever.”

Afterthought:

I doubt seriously that many persons would choose unemployment benefits over gainful employment and suspect that those who do are likely battling other issues, such as drugs or alcohol or personal issues or lack of means of transportation to and from work.

The key phrase, of course, is “gainful employment.”

I believe that what underlies the claims by employers that persons willingly choose unemployment benefits, which are meager at best, is that employers would rather pay meager wages than living ones. So they point their fingers elsewhere to take attention away from the starvation wages they are offering.

But that’s just me.

Share

A Taxing Issue 0

At the Washington Monthly, Jennifer Taub takes a deep dive into the tax fraud charges against Alan Weisselberg and, by implication, Donald Trump’s “business” ventures.

It’s long, complex, and boring, and a very worthwhile read.

Share

Hoarders 0

Thom and his guest discuss the “morbidly wealthy” and their dynastic desires.

“Morbidly weathy.” What a well-turned phrase.

Share

Public Good Private Greed 0

Shorter Will Bunch: Them what has, keeps.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.