Political Economy category archive
A Parable of the Polity 0
Read the story of Bob the Businessman.
The Golden Fleecing 0
States are caught up in their own addiction to dealing–dealing the cards, that is.
New Jersey is such a state. As its gambling casino revenues falter — and new casinos fail — the state has (in the words of the New York Times) doubled down on its gambling concessions.
Much more at the link.
I’ve never been a fan of state lotteries and the like. They are essentially con games–conning taxpapers out of money without an honest tax increase. And, while casinos may look cool in a James Bond movie, a slots parlor is a damned depressing place.
States bet on gambling as a way to raise free money.
Now they are trapped in their own three card monte.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Just wait till next week, when the evul fedrul guvmint gets laid at by the heels by the sequesteration!
(snip)
The less-volatile four-week moving average fell to 355,000 from 361,750.
The number of people continuing to receive jobless benefits dropped by 91,000 to 3.07 million in the week ended Feb. 16, the fewest since the period ended June 21, 2008. The continuing claims figure doesn’t include Americans receiving extended unemployment benefits under federal programs.
In other news, don’t ask Bloomberg’s experts for tips on the ninth at Delaware Park. Really, just don’t.
Sequestrian Dressage: Dr. Wolfe Explains the Choreography 0
PoliticalProf sums up the Republican part of the dance:
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Possibly a trend, plus Bloomberg’s “experts” blow it yet again:
(snip)
Estimates of the 49 economists in the Bloomberg survey ranged from 350,000 to 375,000 claims. The Labor Department revised the previous week’s figure to 368,000 from a previously reported 366,000.
The four-week moving average, a less volatile measure than the weekly figures, rose to 352,500 last week from 351,000.
I wish I could get paid so well for consistently being wrong.
Have Cake, Eat It Too 1
In the Tampa Bay Times, Robyn Blumner ruminates on the contradiction of Republican Economic Theory. Follow the link for details:
That’s the only conclusion I can draw from years of listening to business-oriented groups meeting with the Tampa Bay Times editorial board with the same conflicting agenda: demands for lower taxes and fewer government protections for workers, consumers and the environment while calling for a more educated workforce, modern infrastructure and cities that attract the creative class.
We have an entire political movement dedicated to the belief that those who have the most deserve a free lunch.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Looking a little better once more.
(snip)
The four-week moving average of jobless claims, a less- volatile measure, fell to 350,500, the lowest since March 2008, from 352,750. The average reflects a plunge to 330,000 in initial claims two weeks ago that reflected difficulty in adjusting the data from the holidays and the start of a quarter.
The number of people continuing to collect jobless benefits rose by 8,000 to 3.22 million in the week ended Jan. 26. The continuing claims figure does not include the number of workers receiving extended benefits under federal programs.
Misdirection Plays 0
The Commander Guy: using fear of the national debt as a scare tactic is nothing new.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
A little worse:
(snip)
The number of people who continue to collect jobless benefits climbed by 22,000 to 3.2 million in the week ended Jan. 19. The continuing claims figure does not include workers receiving extended benefits from the federal government.
Those who’ve exhausted their traditional benefits and now are collecting emergency and extended payments jumped by about 418,000 to 2.11 million in the week ended Jan. 12.
Just wait till Republican sequestration sets in, if it does. Then you’ll see jobless claims.
On second thought, sequestering Republicans might not be such a bad id–oh, never mind.
Afterthought:
Self-sequestration! That’s the ticket!
Via Bob Cesca. Follow the link for more.
The Wedding Industrial Complex 0
Psychology Today blogger Laurie Essig attends a “Bridal Expo.”
While there, she interviews couples to find out why they are willing to spend more than they have for a few hours on a single day.
Check it out; see whether you can find any rationality in the reasons.
I couldn’t.
Afterthought:
I once knew a fellow, a construction worker type of guy, who cashed in his retirement to pay for his daughter’s wedding. Words fail me.









