Political Economy category archive

Light the torches! Get the pitchforks!

It is time to storm the Wikileaks castle Domain Name Servers once more:

A former Swiss banker has passed on data containing account details of 2,000 prominent people to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.

The data – which is not yet available on the Wikileaks website – was held on two discs handed over by Rudolf Elmer at a press conference in London.

(snip)

Although it was not confirmed what activities might be covered by the data, the Wikileaks head noted that previous data from Julius Baer provided by Mr Elmer had shed light on tax evasion, the hiding of proceeds of criminal acts and “the protection of assets of those about to fall out of political favour”.

The data covers multinationals, financial firms and wealthy individuals from many countries, including the UK, US and Germany, and covers the period 1990-2009, according to a report in Swiss newspaper Der Sonntag.

Atrios predicts the reaction:

I’m sure the Very Serious People response to anti-rich people leaks to wikileaks will be the same as their response to leaks embarrassing powerful people in governments. It’s just wrong to hold powerful people accountable for anything.

Frankly, I suspect that those particular disks will never be seen again unless they are backed up in multiple secure locations.

“All these high CEOs and Wall Streeters getting bonuses on our tax dollars and . . . the government coming after public employees saying they’re the . . . cause of this . .”

Screenshot:

At the Guardian, Paul Harris comments on the anti-worker frenzy, pointing out the dipsy-doodle to distract persons from the real culprits:

What is perverse about this trend is just how vastly it misunderstands what went wrong with the American economy. No one is denying that this is a time for belt-tightening. Or that some unions have problems. Or that some union contracts look over-generous in austerity America. But the fundamental truth remains: powerful and reckless unions did not cause the Great Recession by rampant speculation. Nor did an out-of-control labour movement cause or burst the housing bubble. It was not union bosses who packaged up complex derivatives to sell in their millions and thus wrecked the economy and put millions out of work. Nor was it union bosses who awarded (and continue to award) themselves salaries worth hundreds of millions of dollars for doing nothing of social value. Neither was it the union movement that was bailed out by the taxpayer and then refused to change its habits.

All that was the work of the finance industry.

Back over 400k, but still a slightly positive trend:

The average number of applications for jobless benefits over the past four weeks dropped to 410,750, the lowest level since July 2008, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. Claims for the week ended Jan. 1 rose by 18,000 to 409,000, in line with the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

Firings have been waning in recent weeks, a necessary step toward gains in hiring that will help boost consumer spending, which accounts for 70 percent of the economy. A report tomorrow is projected to show employers added to payrolls in December for a third month as the U.S. expansion gained speed.

Looking more like a trend, though adjustments will likely have to be made because of the Christmas holiday, which makes for an atypical week.

Even so, under 400k for the first time in a long time:

First-time filings for unemployment insurance decreased by 34,000 to 388,000 in the week ended Dec. 25, compared with the median forecast of 415,000 in a Bloomberg News survey, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. There were no special factors behind the drop, an official at the agency said as the data were released.

New unemployment claims still holding under 450,000. Bloomberg:

First-time filings for jobless insurance declined by 3,000 to 420,000 in the week ended Dec. 18, matching the median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. Those already collecting benefits fell in the previous week to 4.06 million.

(snip)

Estimates of initial claims in the Bloomberg survey of 45 economists ranged from 400,000 to 430,000. The Labor Department revised the prior week’s figure up to 423,000.

Reuters discusses continuing claims, more important than weekly figures:

Continuing claims, which exclude the millions of Americans relying on extended benefits, dipped to 4.06 million in the week ending December 11, down from 4.17 million a week earlier. The four-week average, which smoothes out week-to-week volatility, fell to 4.16 million from 4.19 million.

Via BartBlog.

The Republican policies that make the rich, richer and the poor, poorer.

Santas can’t get work.

“People are telling us they just can’t afford a photo with Santa,” Trolli said.

Even in-demand Santas with real beards have had to slash rates, Trolli said. They once commanded $200 an hour, but now they’re charging half that.

Trolli said that anecdotally, his members’ bookings are off about 25 percent. Other Santas around the nation said that in good years, they booked 40 events a season and are down to fewer than 10. Others who once booked 10 events a year are down to none.

Addendum:

Talk about serendipity, this was in my RSS feed this morning:

Ratify START.

Transcript here.

A smidgen better. Interesting to see what happens in January when retail lays off its Christmas help.

U.S. jobless claims dipped for a second week, suggesting growth in the labor market, but data on home construction showed that sector remains stressed even as the economy shows signs of a pick up.

Initial claims fell 3,000 to a seasonally adjusted 420,000, the Labor Department said on Thursday, in line with forecasts. The four-week moving average of claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends, touched a fresh two-year low.

I have visited Disney World a couple of times. Disney does a wonderful job at make-believe.

After a week in a Disney hotel on the Disney World property, you can feel as if you have become completely disconnected from the rest of world, at least until you check your bank balance. Some persons enjoy it so much that they buy timeshares and take Disney vacations every year.

As much as I enjoyed the show, I found the disconnection to be slightly eerie.

Now, for some, the fantasy has turned dark.

Walt Disney Co. built Celebration, Florida, as an idealized version of a circa-World War II small town, . . . .

(snip)

Celebration’s foreclosure rate is about double the state’s pace as homeowners who paid a premium for a vision of utopia fall behind on their mortgages. Earlier this month, a resident on the verge of losing his house shot himself after a 14-hour standoff with police. Three days before that, the town had its first murder when a man was bludgeoned with an ax.

Disney, by the way, no longer has a business interest in Celebration.

Andy Borowitz reports. A nugget:

“When we first heard about the deal, we were like, this is too good to be true,” said multibillionaire Thurston Howell IV, a spokesman for the richest .0000001%. “But when our butlers read the plan aloud to us during the cocktail hour, we were incredibly stoked.”

Sometimes the facts render editorials redundant. Bloomberg:

Customer demand is spurring hiring, said Woo, who is responsible for supervising employee welfare at the maker of Apple Inc. iPads and Hewlett-Packard Co. computers. China’s exports rose to a record last month, helped by stronger U.S. and European demand, while retail sales grew 19 percent to 1.4 trillion yuan ($210 billion) in October from a year earlier, the Chinese government said.

Foxconn, the largest private employer in China, plans to expand its workforce to as many as 1.3 million by the end of next year, Woo said in an August interview. The Taipei-based company employed about 920,000 workers at that time.

Listen to Klaatu explain urban camping.

Starting to look like a trend:

The number of workers filing first- time claims for unemployment insurance payments fell last week in the U.S., showing the labor market continues to improve.

Applications for jobless benefits decreased to 421,000, less than the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News, from a revised 438,000 the prior week, Labor Department figures showed today. The four-week moving average, a less-volatile measure, dropped to the lowest level in more than two years.

The auction business is bullish.

There were three pages of announcements for foreclosure auctions in this morning’s local rag. In the olden days, there might be one or two–auctions, not pages.

In another story, the local rag recounted the experiences of a couple who regularly buy at auction:

Frantz and his wife had carefully examined the house in the weeks before the foreclosures fire sale run by Auction.com at the Norfolk Waterside Marriott. They knew the area’s property market, projected home prices and how much work the house needed.

That’s how they snagged the property for $108,000 less than its assessed value.

“It’s a more honest way to sell homes,” Frantz said of the auction. “There’s no games.”

He paused.

“There’s games after. The bank can counteroffer. But we’ve been through that process.”
Auctions are growing in popularity as a way to buy real estate, according to Auction.com.

Another in the occasional series, What Digby Said.

Trend?

The number of applications for jobless benefits averaged 431,000 a week over the month ended Nov. 27, the lowest level since August 2008, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. Claims increased by 26,000 last week, more than forecast, to 436,000, after reaching a two-year low.

“Lower lows and lower highs define a downward trend, and that’s what seems finally to be emerging,” Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics LLC in Valhalla, New York, said in a note to clients. “If it continues, we should expect to see better payroll numbers over the next few months.”

Jay Bookman discusses the implications. A nugget:

When people talk about how much the wealthy pay in taxes, the chart above explains why: They are paying more taxes because they’re making a LOT more money than they used to make. It also helps to explain why the socioeconomic nature of the country has changed so much in the past 30 years. When people say that we’re not the country we used to be, they’re right. We’re not.