Political Economy category archive
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Back up to half a mil.
We don’t need no stinkin’ stimulus:
Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast claims slipping to 476,000 from the previously reported 484,000 the prior week, which was revised up to 488,000 in Thursday’s report.
When Good Crops Go Bad 0
“Feral canola“:
In the U.S., 90 to 95 percent of commercially grown canola is genetically modified to be herbicide resistant; the researchers said 80 percent of the wild canola identified in the most recent discovery had at least one of two herbicide-resistance genes.
It is the advance guard for the killer tomatoes.
Afterthought:
All joking aside, this is not good. The creature has escaped.
Stimulus. We Don’t Need No Stinking Stimulus. 0
We need good old-fashioned traditional values, like breadlines.
Contract on America 0
Dave Johnson:
We, the People built this country’s prosperity and this built wealth. We reinvested that wealth, building the world’s most competitive economy. Now a few people are gaming the system and breaking the formula, taking for themselves vast riches, leaving the rest of us to clean up the mess.
It’s worth a read.
Via Skippy.
Waste Reduction, Have Cake, Eat It Too Dept. (Updated) 0
Politicians of all persuasions love to complain about government waste. It’s this great big shadowy thing that is always there, even if it’s not.
Except, of course, when it’s their waste. The Department of War Defense wants to eliminate what it considers to be a wasteful and redundant command headquartered in this part of the world.*
Oh noes.
It is noteworthy that many of these pols, especially on the state and local level, have willingly eliminated teachers, garbage collectors, police officers, and highway repair persons because they couldn’t figure out how to pay them.
It reveals how much of the caterwauling about government “waste and bureaucray” is just so much cant.
“Cut his waste,” they say’ “but don’t cut mine.”
_____________
*I don’t have a position on this particular command, but I do believe the government spends far more than needed on ways of ending lives and far less than needed on ways of improving them.
Addendum, Later That Same Day:
Noz points out the inconsistency:
(snip)
but if that’s the case, how to they explain the bipartisan outcry whenever something like this (base closure–ed.) happens?
A Modest Proposal 0
Writing at the Guardian, Peter Wilby discusses Warren Buffet’s and Bill Gates’s efforts to persuade billionaires to give away the bulk of their fortunes upon demise. While applauding their efforts,* he suggests
Never happen.
_____________________
*The efforts are worthy of applause. Whatever you may think of how they got rich–and I have no love of Microsoft’s business practices, which can best be summarized as “copy, co-opt, and crush“–Buffet and Gates both seem determined to use their riches to accomplish something more than more riches.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Not good. Bloomberg:
(snip)
Economists forecast claims would fall to 455,000, according to the median of 43 projections. Estimates ranged from 444,000 to 470,000. The government revised the prior week’s total to 460,000 from a previously reported 457,000.
Who are these economists and why does anyone pay attention to their forecasts?
iWingnut 0
Via The Richmonder.
Kantor’s Cant 0
Congressman Kantor stumbles over a bit of truth. From TPM:
He should get some positive credit for the admission. The article goes on to list big-name Republican congresspersons who are denying the obvious.
The Economy Is in the Toilet Indicators 0
Karen explains:
Joe was at a woman’s house the other day. She has leaks on all 3 toilets she has in her house. He was able to repair 2 of them, but the 3rd has to be replaced. She’s going to check with her neighbor to see if they have an old toilet they changed out, that she can have. Her house has been on the market for 18 months, with no serious offers. And she’s in prime area, in Golden.
More at the link.
Breadlines, Anyone? 0
Why more stimulus is needed:
The report, a result of a survey by the National League of Cities, the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the National Association of Counties, showed local governments are moving to cut the equivalent of 8.6 percent of their workforces from 2009 to 2011. That suggests 481,000 employees will lose their jobs, according to the report, which said the tally may yet rise.
What Is Good for Wall Street Is Not Necessarily Good for Anybody Else 0
Balloon Juice. Scroll to the list of bullet items in the bottom 2/3rds of the post.
We err when we let ourselves be convinced that the only measures of economic success are stock prices, dividends, and bonus payments to executives.
Important, maybe, at least the first two; the last should be eliminated and replaced with salary increases (or decreases, as warranted); only, no.
Weekly Address 0
Eistein (possibly apocryphal):
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Republicans (from the transcript):
First, he would repeal health insurance reform, which would take away tax credits from millions of small business owners, and take us back to the days when insurance companies had free rein to drop coverage and jack up premiums. Second, he would say no to new investments in clean energy, after his party already voted against the clean energy tax credits and loans that are creating thousands of new jobs and hundreds of new businesses. And third, even though his party voted against tax cuts for middle-class families, he would permanently keep in place the tax cuts for the very wealthiest Americans – the same tax cuts that have added hundreds of billions to our debt.
These are not new ideas. They are the same policies that led us into this recession. They will not create jobs, they will kill them. They will not reduce our deficit, they will add $1 trillion to our deficit. They will take us backward at a time when we need to keep America moving forward.
Q. E. D.
The Galt and the Lamers, Reverse Look-Up Dept. 0
A while ago, I demonstrated that there is an assumption which dare not speak its name underlying Republican Economic Theory (follow the link for the demonstration):
From this touching faith in the beneficence of the rich comes the Laffable Curve and voodoo economics, as well as the castration of the regulatory structure–those strategies which have worked so well to send the United States economy into a tailspin, dragging the rest of the world behind it.
The corollary which dare not speak its name is that the poor are inherently not virtuous, that they are poor because they either deserve or want to be, and therefore must be punished.
This accounts not only for the Republican Party’s opposition to unemployment payments (since obviously all those unemployed folks laid themselves off), but also for its slavering and slavish desire to cut taxes for the rich.
Excerpt:
Making the Poor Poorer 0
Republican Economic Theory does not work and play well with facts. Follow the link and read the whole thing. From the Neiman Watchdog:
(snip)
. . . California professor, G. William Domhoff of Santa Cruz, looks at the increasing concentration of wealth rather than income. By 2007, he reported, only 20 percent of the people owned 85 percent of the wealth in the United States. When he looked at pure financial wealth (leaving out the value of your home), the top 20 percent had a 93 percent share, leaving only seven percent for the rest of us.
One more time, Truman was right.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
According to Republicans, jobs are out there:
“The key story here is the extreme uncertainty over the near-term path of claims as a result of the annual retooling shutdowns, which throw the seasonal adjustments into chaos,” Ian Shepherdson, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics LLC in Valhalla, New York, said before the report. Shepherdson projected claims would drop to 420,000.









