Political Economy category archive
ARMs Race 2
They’re gonna blow, Cap’n!
The Option Adjustable Rate Mortgages, that is:
The bulk of outstanding option ARMs — a product no longer available to homebuyers — were issued between 2004 and 2007. Monthly payments on these mortgages are due to reset to a higher lending rate between 2009 and 2012.
In related developments, I listened yesterday to a discussion of Mr. Obama’s proposals for financial consumer protection. From the website:
One of the guests, the one from the American Enterprise Institute, mouthpiece of the Ayn Rand school of business regulation, wiggled like a worm to blame the current financial situation on “predatory borrowing.”
The other guests did not let him get away with this. Neither did the callers. One caller who had worked for a mortgage broker called in and described the tactics the broker used to pressure persons into whifty mortgages. Another called to describe how, when he wanted a 30-year straight mortgage, his mortgage broker dragged the process out for weeks trying to sell him one anything but a 30-year straight.
Follow the link to hear the show or click here to listen (Real).
Customers didn’t create this mess. Bankers did.
Where Were the Cops? 0
This American Life, in a follow-up to its marvelous show from last year, “The Giant Pool of Money,” investigates why the regulators missed the boat bust:
Follow the link to hear or download the show. Find other This American Life episodes on the economy here.
Forget the Coaster. Ride the Leverage. 0
MarketWatch:
Bloomberg has a more longer story here. From the Bloomberg story:
Six Flags shares have fallen 86 percent in the past 12 months as investors have grown skeptical about the company’s ability to refinance preferred income equity redeemable shares, or PIERS, before their August redemption date. On Aug. 15, $287.5 million in preferred stock matures and $131 million of 8.875 percent senior notes come due next year.
The issue doesn’t seem to be profitability in the conventional sense. I read elsewhere (can’t remember where–yesterday was a long time ago) that day-to-day operations have been profitable for the last couple of years. Rather, it seems to be “leverage”–debt.
Despite the magic of double-entry bookkeeping (not the same as two sets of books) and Wall Street’s double-talk, the past year has proven that more debt does not magically mean more wealth (or, to use Wall Street’s double-talk, “wealth-creation”) unless the meny obtained through debt is actually used to create something useful, like a bridge or a school or a factory or such.
I haven’t dug it out yet and may never do so, but I got a dollar to a doughnut that a lot of the debt didn’t have anything to do with building new theme parks and improving the business, but just with “taking the cash out.”
I’m betting that cash didn’t go anywhere useful.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Bloomberg (emphasis added):
Initial jobless claims fell by 24,000 to 601,000 in the week ended June 6, fewer than forecast and the lowest level since January, from a revised 625,000 the prior week, Labor Department figures showed today in Washington. The number of people collecting benefits rose for a 19th straight time to a record 6.82 million in the prior week.
Meanwhile,
Down Discomforter 0
Dour Bauer:
(snip)
Eddie Bauer had $187.9 million in long-term borrowings and $2.62 million in cash in the quarter that ended April 4, according to a company filing. The company reported a loss of $44.5 million in the first quarter on sales of about $180 million.
If you read below the headlines, many of the bankruptcies are coming, not because of what’s happening today, but because of what happened yesterday–companies contracted oodles of debt figuring that they could just keep refinancing it forever.
Dustbiters 0
Bank of Lincolnwood, Lincolnwood, Illinois, ain’t no more.
Bushboroughs 0
The Nation explores tent cities. A nugget:
Read the whole thing.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Bloomberg estimates:
The jobless rate jumped to 9.2 percent, the highest level since 1983, according to the median estimate of 75 economists in a Bloomberg News survey. Employers probably cut 520,000 workers from payrolls, the smallest decrease in seven months.
And a lot of the employment has been temp work.
Moral: A healthy economy can’t be built on financial shenanigans boxes of air. And, remember, this mess was not an accident. It was caused by policies. Republican policies.
We Need Single Payer 0
The chain, which also operates as Happy Harry’s in Delaware, said it will drop out of the state-federal health insurance program for low-income people as of July 6. The chain has 66 Delaware locations, the most of any pharmacy chain in the state.
Not taking a stand on this particular contretemps–follow the link for an article that sets out the arguments of both the state and Walgreens, the issue here is really something else.
Both federal and state governments have been attacking their budgetary costs for medical aid at the wrong end, by limiting payments to doctors, hospitals, drugstores, and other providers.
The issue is at the other end, where the care starts, not where it ends, with a system that pushes the costs for doctors and drugstores and nurses and so on much higher than it needs to be. The University of Maine reports the following (PDF–click on the excerpt for the full report; it’s chock full of facts):

It’s not the cost of doctors and nurses and pharmicists that’s outrageous. It’s the cost of admininistrators, particularly “insurance” administrators, and prescription drugs (PDF) that are out of control. Reducing payments to doctors, nurses, and pharmacists mops up the blood without stopping the bleeding.
We Need Single Payer 0
Reuters:
More than 75 percent of these bankrupt families had health insurance but still were overwhelmed by their medical debts, the team at Harvard Law School, Harvard Medical School and Ohio University reported in the American Journal of Medicine.
(snip)
About 170 million people get health insurance through an employer but President Barack Obama says soaring healthcare costs are hurting the economy and forcing businesses to drop medical insurance for their workers. . . .
“Nationally, a quarter of firms cancel coverage immediately when an employee suffers a disabling illness; another quarter do so within a year,” the report reads.
Movable Fees 0
Have cake, eat it too (emphasis added):
“What Microsoft wants to do is deduct the cost at a high tax rate and report the profits at a low tax rate,” Bosworth said. “Relative to where they are now, the administration’s proposals are less favorable, so there will be some rebalancing on their part.”
How Bad Is It? 0
This bad:
Since they do not have authority to change their own salaries–the law prevents them from voting on their own pay–they say they will accomplish this by returning money to the country treasury.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
New unemployment down slightly.
They’re running out of persons to lay off, plus it was a short week:
Also, from the same story,
The number of people staying on the benefit rolls after collecting an initial week of aid fell 15,000 to 6.74 million in the week ended May 23, the latest week for which the data is available.
15,000 is 00.2% (in fractions, that’s two thousandths) of 6,740,000. This is grasping at straws statistics.
We Need Single-Payer Health Care 0
The only persons the currrent system benefits are the insurance companies, with their armies of faceless bureaucrats charged with figuring out how to deny paying for care.
The majority of people with health insurance, about 160 million Americans, receive it through their jobs.
“American families with employer-based coverage were worse off in 2007 than they were in 2004,” said Jon Gabel, lead author of the study that was published in a June 2 Health Affairs Web exclusive. “This is during a period of time when the economy was expanding.”
Vigorish 0
Maybe there’s some hope for action against the fine-print Fagins:
Now, maybe, borrowers might catch a break. There is serious talk in Congress and the White House about creating a Financial Products Safety Commission, charged with protecting consumers and the country from the depredations of irresponsible lending.
The whole thing is worth a read.
California Dreamin’ 0
The story goes on to cite the Federal bailout of New York City as a comparison.
This situation illustrates the internal contradictions (as Marx would have said) of Republican Economic Theory. Republicans have rendered raising taxes almost impossible in Cali. At the same time, they rendered cutting services almost impossible. For a long time, thanks to Republicanism, Californians have been thinking they can get something for nothing–more expensive government services (it’s called the Price Index) without paying for them.
Before you scream welfare queens, consider that schools and corrections are almost half of the total.
(Note that I am not arguing for any particular tax policy. Far be it from me to offer any solutions.)
I am merely pointing out another example that the Republican theory that cutting taxes is the economic 42, the answer to life, the universe, and everything, is just so much hooey. It is the camouflage for the Party’s mission of making the rich richer and the poor poorer.
Everything has a price.
Taxes are the price of living in a civilized society.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Running out of persons to lay off:
However, the number of people staying on benefit rolls after drawing an initial week of aid increased 110,000 to a higher-than-forecast 6.79 million in the week ended May 16.
On a possibly brighter note, the same story reports that April durable goods orders were up slightly.
I say “possibly” because these preliminary figures, including the unemployment figures, are often revised a month later–usually in the wrong direction. Follow the link to see what happened to the March durable goods estimate.
The Household Financial Fallacy 0
Fundamental to this whole mess is thinking of one’s primary residence, not as a place to live, but as an investment. That’s gambling with the grocery money.
The S&P/Case-Shiller home-price index decreased 18.7 percent from March 2008, matching the drop in the year ended in February. The measure declined 19 percent in January, the most since data began in 2001.
Record foreclosures are depressing the value of other properties, contributing to a slump in household wealth that is hurting consumer spending and the economy. Still, falling prices and mortgage rates have made homes more affordable, helping to stem the slide in sales, which will eventually help prices stabilize.
Douglas A. McIntyre, writing at 24/7, considers the claim that the S&P data is so old (two months) as to be meaningless:
The market is looking for ways to claim that housing is finding a bottom and that it is possible that a recovery in home prices in in the wings. While there may be some pick-up in sales in the most depressed markets including Nevada and Florida, there is no sign that prices are rising. Clever buyers are moving in to buy homes in foreclosure, but the prices of these houses are so low that their sales may actually bring down the average price of the homes being sold in those markets.







