From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

The Wall-Eyed Piker 0

The Arizona Republic’s Elvia Diaz points out that Trump’s wall keeps tumbling down, just like everything else (Trump steaks, Trump vodka, Atlantic City casinos, and almost the United States of America) that Donald Trump has been associated with. A snippet:

I’m cracking up over the fact that smugglers have breached Trump’s border wall more than 3,000 times over the past three years.

It’s true. The $15 billion wall, which Trump claimed over and over again that Mexico would pay for, “is no match for a $15 hand saw.”

Even cheaper tools probably would have poked holes in it.

Share

Fright Court 0

Brent Cavanaugh shouts,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Lies and Lying Liars 0

Psychologist Christian Hart has studied lies and liars for over a decade. He proposes a three-factor theory to explain when and why persons lie. In the light of the proliferation of perfidy in the polity, methinks his piece is worth a look.

Here are the three factors; follow the link for a discussion of each and the interplay among them.

      1. The perceived utility of lying.
      2. The perceived external disutility risk of lying (the probability and consequences of being detected) is acceptable.

      3. The perceived internal disutility of lying (guilt, regret, shame) is acceptable.

Aside:

It seems to me that, as a corollary, if one is incapable of shame, one might have an infinite capacity for lying.

Not that anyone like that might be in our public lif–oh, never mind.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Canadian professor of communications Robert Danisch offers a taxonomy of linguistic toxicity, identifying seven rhetorical techniques that foment division and hostility (or, to put it another way, he reveals the Fox News playbook). In introducing his article, he points out that

Research shows that divisive, violent, dehumanizing rhetoric can sanction negative or hateful views that people may otherwise have hidden, and embolden people to act on these.

What’s worse, these seven rhetorical tactics tend to beget one another and inspire a communication cycle in which emotions are amplified and conflict is escalated.

I commend his article to your attention.

Share

The Loyalty Oath 0

Leonard Hitchcock has a theory as to why so many Republicans, when responding to polls, say that they believe Donald Trump won the 2020 election–that it’s a sort of loyalty oath to their dear leader. A nugget:

Saying “yes” to the question “Did Trump win the 2020 election?” might actually mean only that the respondent wished to make it clear that he or she was a loyal Trump supporter. Trump himself treats believing that he won the election as a test of loyalty. So, to show doubt that he did so by not answering “yes” in the survey, would be to put oneself squarely in the camp of the enemy.

Methinks he may be onto something. Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Look in the Mirror, Boy 0

Remember that the notion of some kind of inherent “American exceptionalism” is a myth most often perpetrated by those who would excuse the inexcusable. If a person or a people wish to be considered somehow “exceptional,” he or she or they must earn it.

Read more »

Share

Fatal Attraction 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Ronald Riggio notes an oft-overlooked bit of obvious: Someone cannot be a leader without followers. He goes on to explore several reasons why persons choose to follow bad leaders–bad, that is, in the sense that they do bad things.

Here’s one of the reasons he suggests, one that I think is of particular import in the current state of our polity, where, if over half the registered voters show up at the polls, it’s considered an “overwhelming turn-out” and where puny turn-outs are common in state and local elections.

Many Followers Are Apathetic. Many of us put our leaders on a pedestal. We let them take the reins of power, and we look away, assuming that they will do the right thing. It is the obligation of good followers to hold leaders accountable for their actions and to call them out on their misbehavior. But too often we give leaders “a pass” instead, or we make exceptions for them. This is why many leaders get away with wicked or immoral behavior that followers and others could never get away with (“It’s OK because they are the leader.”).

Follow the link for the rest.

(Spellink errors fixed.)

Share

Paper Trail 0

Frame One:  Sound of toilets flushing repeatedly.  Frames Two-Four:  Danae says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

The Reveal 0

Title:  The Masks Are Coming Off.  Frame One, captioned

Click to view the original image.

Share

Licensed to Kill 0

Thom takes a critical look at “stand your ground” laws.

Share

Facebook Frolics 2

Share

Inundation 0

Woman watching TV news.  Voice from the TV says,

Click for the original image.

Share

Picturing the Fifth Column 0

GOP Elephants standing around a tank driven by Putin, which has crushed a figure labeled

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

From the Youtube page:

Trump loves to “go with a winner”, and he sees Vladimir Putin as a HUGE winner of late, making major real estate acquisitions with very little investment of his own, just as Trump always did. Trump can’t help but envy Putin’s incredible ability to skip legalities and jump right to the ‘moving-in’ stage. That, and Putin’s ability to look good shirtless give Trump a major case of “nipple envy”, but in a really wholesome, Christian sort of way.

Share

Gutting Out the Vote 0

Share

The Turncoat 0

Abraham Lincoln says,

Via Balloon Juice.

Share

The Plane Truth 0

Seth rounds up the news from his two-week hiatus.

Share

Birds of a Feather? 0

The writer of a letter to the editor of the Portland Press-Herald sees some similarities between Shkreli and Trump.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Mangy comments at the Youtube page:

As Trump becomes more and more panicked about all the damning evidence being presented about January 6th, his business, his mishandling of classified documents, etc., in order to distract, he is turning more and more to his golden oldie greatest hits collection; blaming Hillary. Truly the mark of a loser.

Mangy Fetlocks wrote a song for Larry Lazuli to sing, but Larry is too loud for any house with a sleeping baby, so Mangy sang this one himself. Larry still got something out of it. While at the Fetlocks’ place, Larry pocketed Mangy’s hot dog tongs, spark plug gapping set, and took three beers from his fridge. Here’s the lyrics Larry would have sung if he could just tone it down a notch now and then.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.