From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

Mulling Mueller, Reprise 0

At Above the Law, Joe Patrice argues convincingly that many of the initial reactions to the Mueller report are getting it wrong. Folks who had been hoping that Robert Mueller would turn into a Fairy Godfather and give them a magic pumpkin have been disappointed and are gnashing their teeth in frustration, without reflection.

The “without reflection” bit is the important bit; reflection is called for.

Here’s part of what he has to say about Attorney-General Barr’s “summary” letter (emphasis added):

Instead of complaining about what the letter says about the report’s conclusions, focus a bit more on what it says about the investigation itself. The letter says that Mueller made the decision not to make a prosecutorial judgment one way or the other about obstruction. It’s curious that Barr chooses not to quote Mueller here. Could Mueller have just not included any language about this decision in his report? That seems unlikely. It seems that this section of the report — at the very least — could be released today so everyone can get a better sense of Mueller’s thinking on this. There’s no argument that any grand jury materials — the reason Barr claims the report cannot be released immediately in its entirety — are implicated by just reading Mueller’s own interpretation of why he could not make a traditional prosecutorial decision. This isn’t to dispute that Mueller made this call, but for a letter eager to take direct quotes when it can, the reticence to let everyone gauge Mueller’s own language is curious.

This matters because a description of Mueller’s “decision” that reads much closer to “As discussed, making a determination on this issue would exceed my mandate so I have made the decision to present the evidence I found without making a determination one way or the other,” would make for a very different hearing before the House.

The whole thing is worth your while.

Share

Russian Impulses, Mulling Mueller Dept. 0

Methinks Ed over at Gin and Tacos makes a good point.

I also commend Shaun Mullen’s take on it to your attention.

Afterthought:

It is unquestionable that Russia worked surreptitiously (and sometimes titiously) to promote Donald Trump’s campaign for the presidency. It also seems likely that there was some coordination with various Trump flunkies and family members (the Trump Tower meeting being the most prominent indicator thereof). Nevertheless, one question has nagged me throughout all this (and may account for my not devoting as many electrons to the Mueller investigation as some others have), and I have finally figured out what it is:

To conspire with someone requires taking him or her into your confidence, at least to a degree.

If you were a wily operative like Vladimir Putin, would you take a buffoon like Donald Trump into your confidence?

Share

Priorities 0

Republican Elephant speaks:  Yes, New Zealand has now banned assault rifles, but Americans have different priorities.  An extreme interpretation of the 2nd Amendment.  we are willing to take a bullet for that.  In fact, a nonstop spray of bullets mowing down our fiends and children, over and over forever.  Crazy New Zealanders.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

How To Deal with a Threatened Trumpling 0

Spocko offers a case study.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

PoliticalProf anticipates the purity twits.

Share

Which Witch? 0

Dana Milbank explains.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Say hello to Devin Nunes’ Cow (warning: language).

Share

A Study in Contrasts 0

Jacinda of New Zealand vs. Trump.  Frame One:  Jacinda ostracizes white nationalist terrorists.  Trump normalizes white nationalist terrorists.  Frame Two:  Jacinda, pointing to map of New Zealand, tells refugees,

Click for the original image.

Share

Freedom of Screech 0

Ed at Gin and Tacos considers “deplatforming.” A snippet:

Beneath the layers of apologia from the tech bros in charge of these companies, not to mention the hand-wringing over a red herring version of Free Speech, remember that Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other social media platforms managed to get rid of ISIS and most Islamic extremist groups very easily. They can get rid of white supremacists and far-right content, too.

It’s worth the 30 seconds of your time that it will take to read the rest.

Share

The Entitlement Society 0

Thom’s guest, Vicky Ward, argues that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are no Ken and Barbie.

Share

A Gamed System 0

Image:  White House with a side door labeled

Click for the original image.

The Founders argued that the Electoral College would prevent incompetent persons from becoming president. In the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton asserted that

The process of election affords a moral certainty, that the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.

Clearly, the Founders were, as my old boss used to say, “in error.”

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

The Rude One comments on our Out-of-Control-Twit-in-Chief (warning: rudeness).

Share

The King of Facebook Frolics 0

Share

Thoughts and Prey-ers. 0

Title:  Bold Action vs. Thoughts and Prayers.  Frame One:  Prime Minister of New Zealand saying,

Click for the original image.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Litigious twits.

Via Badtux.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse, Consider the Source Dept. 0

Two newspaper stands, one labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

News of the Whirl 0

Frame One:  Title:  Life in the Stupid-verse, an Endlessly Ongoing Series.  Frame Two:  Dispatches from the Meritocracy (Man says,

Click for the original image.

Share

The Market for America’s Exports 0

What Noz said.

Read more »

Share

“Say It Ain’t So, Joe” 2

Shaun Mullen.

As much as I liked and respected Joe Biden as a Senator, I agree with Shaun.

Heck, there are already too many Democrats testing the presidential waters (not to mention that entitled snowflake, the Man Who Ruined Coffee) and it’s still way too early . . . .

Sometimes, I find myself nostalgic for the smoke-filled rooms.

Share

It’s the American Way 0

Tony Norman looks at the college admission cheating scandal and argues that, once you look past the patriotic propaganda, cheating is woven into the fabric of America. Here’s a nugget:

The colonists cheated the Native peoples out of their land and then killed them when they rebelled against the lopsided arrangements. Africans were brought here in chains and their descendants were cheated of the fruits of their backbreaking labor even though the country become rich from their blood, sweat and suffering.

We’re even cheating the future by saddling coming generations of Americans with trillions of dollars of debt to finance obscene tax cuts for the wealthy. Our descendants will also inherit a much-degraded environment because the political party most devoted to protecting the interests of the rich doesn’t believe in climate science.

More at the link.

Read more »

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.