From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

The Flip Side 0

Farron offers Donald Trump a technique so as not to be afraid of “flipping.”

Share

What’s in a Name? 0

Newsperson in front of White House reports,

Click for the original image.

Share

Comin’ Round the Bend 0

Shorter Jay Bookman: You ain’t seen nothing yet.

Share

How Stuff Works, U. S. Health Care Dept. 0

Voice on phone:  Acme Health Insurance.  How may we help you?  Pig:  Yes, I had a massive infection and had to be rushed to the hospital and you refused to pay for it.  Can I ask why?  Voice:  Yes.  That was an elective procedure.  Pig:  But I would have died.  Voice:  And you elected to live.  Pig, with call over, to Rat:  They've got me there.

Click for the original image.

Share

Spinning Tales 0

At Delaware Liberal, Jason 330 tracks the evolution (revolution?) of Donald Trump’s spin.

Share

The Parade Passes in Rebuke 0

Parade if retired military officers, intelligence chiefs, and the like carrying signs reading,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

Bandwidth 0

Jim Wright, who had a career in intelligence work, theorizes as to why the American polity is vulnerable to dis- and misinformation. It is worth your while. Here’s a bit:

Information warfare.

More powerful, more far-reaching, more scalable, more destructive to the very fabric of our society than any nuclear bomb.

This form of warfare is incredibly powerful, far more so than any other weapon – because it reaches directly into your mind and shapes how you see the world.

Information warfare is infinitely scalable, it can target a single individual, or the entire global population, it can target a single decision-maker, a government, a population, or alter the course of history.

For example: The president of this country watches a certain news/talk/infotainment show. Every day. Without fail. And that show, the information presented there, directly shapes how he sees the world. You can watch this happen daily in real-time. Those who control that show, has direct and immediate influence on the president, and thus on the country, and thus on a global scale. It is a astounding national security vulnerability. One our enemies are well, well aware of and one, a vulnerability that our own counter-intelligence people cannot plug due to the very nature of their own Commander-in-Chief.

This is unprecedented in our history.

Share

Taylor-Made 0

My local rag digs into a story about a signature accomplishment.

Share

The Birth of a Notion 0

Frame One:  EPA Director watches Rudy Guiliani declare,

Click for the original image.

Share

Immunity Impunity 0

Black couple reading newspaper with headlines,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Presidented and Unprecedented 0

Mike mulls the implications of thirteen former intelligence heads’ decision to sign a statement criticizing Donald Trump’s revocation of John Brennan’s security clearance (warning: language).

Share

Fantastic Viewerage 0

At The Guardian, two Amherst professors imagine how today’s Republicans would respond if Donald Trump did, indeed, shoot someone (say, maybe, just for instance, Michael Cohen) on Fifth Avenue in plain view of passers-by. Here’s a snippet; follow the link for the rest:

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders:

Associated Press: “Ms Sanders, did the president shoot his former lawyer in an effort to stop him from testifying against the president?”

Sarah Sanders: “No, he did not.”

AP: “Are you saying that the shooting was not motivated by Mr Cohen’s recent plea deal, or rather that the president did not shoot him?”

SHS: “You’ve got my answer, Jim. No, no, no.”

AP: “Ms Sanders, I’m still not clear what –”

SHS: “The answer is no. No as in no. N. O. It’s these kinds of questions that have turned the American people against the press.”

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

Married to the Mob 0

Field describes a match made in Manhattan.

Share

Bewitched 0

In the context of considering the statements of the Manafort juror who spoke to Fox News, Kathryn Rubino calls out the weird “logic” of those who have convinced themselves that Donald Trump and his Trumpettes are somehow the victims of a “witch hunt”

Ummm I’m not sure she knows what a “witch hunt” means. See, because there is no such thing as a witch, when you go searching for one, you will necessarily find only innocent people. Contrast that with the Manafort case — Duncan herself believes he was guilty (calling the evidence “overwhelming”) on all 18 counts — whatever the reason he was investigated he still did something wrong. Notice how no one who trots out this “witch hunt” logic has any issues when drug smugglers get caught as a result of a routine traffic stop. Druggie McDrugerston wouldn’t have gotten caught if they weren’t after people with a broken tail light, but here we are.

(Missing link fixed.)

Share

Clouds of Witless 0

Shorter Shuan Mullen: Know them by the company they keep.

Share

“The Best People” 0

PoliticalProf.

Share

“They Don’t Know What They Don’t Know” 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Bobby Azarian explores how the Dunning-Kruger Effect may help Bolster Donald Trump’s support. A snippet (emphasis added; follow the link for the rest):

As predicted, the results showed that those who scored low on political knowledge were also the ones who overestimated their level of knowledge. But that wasn’t all. When participants were given cues that made them engage in partisan thought, the Dunning-Kruger effect was made even stronger. This occurred with both Republicans and Democrats, but only in those who scored low on political knowledge to begin with.

These findings are fascinating but equally troubling. How do you combat ignorance when the ignorant believe themselves to be knowledgeable? Even worse, how do you fight it when America is becoming increasingly polarized, which certainly increases the salience of partisan identities?

(snip)

This effect may help explain why certain Trump supporters seem to be so easily tricked into believing proven falsehoods when the president delivers what have become known as “alternative facts,” often using language designed to activate partisan identities. Because they lack knowledge but are confident that they do not, they are less likely than others to actually fact-check the claims that the President makes.

Add the white-wing proganda machine, and voila!, Donald Trump.

Share

Unsecurity 0

Image of John Brennan in a dignified pose, labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

“All the President’s Men” 0

Shaun Mullen discusses the implications of Michael Cohen’s copping a plea.

Share

Precedented 0

Donald Trump walks by painting of Richard Nixon.  Nixon's image is thinking,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.