Political Theatre category archive
Fatal Attraction 0
The writer of a letter to the editor of the Portland Press-Herald struggles to understand white working class voters’* fealty to Donald Trump. A nugget; follow the link for the rest:
But why have the middle class and poor supported this? Is it because their fear of “the others” has blinded them to this picking of their pockets?
__________________
*Hint: The key word in the preceding phrase is “white.”
All the News that Fits 0
In response to a caller, Thom theorizes that the major TV news networks practice selective interviewing as regards persons they put forward as “Democratic spokespersons.”
Full Disclosure:
I do not have a strong opinion on this, as I gave up on television news years ago, as it became a parade of substance-less blather and staged talking heads in boxes shouting over each other. I get most of my news the old fashioned way.
I read stuff.
Frankly, I think the lack of substance and the “both sides do it” narrative are more pernicious than who gets on what interview shows, but that’s just me.
WYSIGWYG 0
Leonard Pitts, Jr., points out that Donald Trump is exactly what he appears to be, that no one who pays attention can credibly claim to be shocked, shocked, I say, at what took place in Helsinki. A snippet:
The man who thought Colin Kaepernick unpatriotic for kneeling could not bring himself to stand up for his country.
The man who insults, berates and belittles our allies could not bring himself to rebuke one of our greatest adversaries.
The man who sees threats in the eyes of Honduran children could see no threat in a murderous tyrant with nuclear arms.
Do please read the rest.
The Deal 0

Mike Littwin is not optimistic. A snippet from his article:
I don’t expect that to happen. I don’t expect much to happen. Some are suggesting that any Trump aide with a conscience should resign. Some are suggesting that if this crisis heats up, there could be the need for a scapegoat. John Kelly, anyone?
If you think this is a crisis point for America — and I certainly do — that doesn’t mean you have to believe it will play out any differently from all the rest. Isn’t the essence of Trumpworld that we now live in the post-tipping-point era?
Image via Job’s Anger.
Nomenclature 0
F. T. Rea explains what’s in a name.
Conundrum 0
Yes, it is possible to disapprove of something and delight in it simultaneously.
The Cloning 0
Shaun Mullen has more. A snippet (emphasis in the original):









![John Fulgesang cites Alexander Hamilton: The truth unquestionable is that the only path to a subversion of the republican system of the Country is, by flattering the prejudices of the people and exciting their jealousies and apprehensions, to throw affairs into confusion, and bring on civil commotion. . . . When a man unprincipled in private life[,] desparate in his fortune, bold in his temper, possessed of considerable talents . . . .despotic in ordinary demeanor--known to have scoffed in private at the principles of liberty--when such a man is seen to mount the hobby horse of personality--to join in the cry of danger to liberty--to take every opportunity of embarrassing the General Government & bringing it under suspicion--to flatter and fall in with all the nonsense zealots of the day--it may justly be suspected that is object is to throw things into confusion that he man](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AkTkoVM--HM/W0lyhHnWp7I/AAAAAAABz9g/-E0AVTAFtiYxVl3oX7DGqz1jio1QBCqFwCLcBGAs/s640/y-0.png)