From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

And the Morals of the Story Are . . . . 0

Werner Herzog’s Bear draws some lessons from the recent Alabama Senate special election. Here’s a couple; follow the link for the rest.

5. BUT: let’s be honest, a candidate like Strange would have probably beat Jones pretty handily.

6. That last point shows the Republican Party has a continuing problem of letting its base choose candidates in the primary who are repulsive to the general electorate. See Todd Aiken, Joe Miller, etc.

Share

The Galt and the Lamers, Republican Roulette Dept. 0

Dick Polman looks at the Republican tax deform bill and tries to figure out, why, for Pete’s sake, just why are they rushing ahead with this monstrosity.

Share

Suffer the Children 0

Title:  The New Scrooge.  Image:  Senator Orrin Hatach costomeed as plutocrat tearing apoart the

Click for the original image.

(Open tag fixed. Darn computers expect you to splet stuff rite.)

Share

The Stages of Trumpery 0

Title:  The Five Stages of Trumpism.  Captions:  The Five Stages of Trumpism.  #1:  It's a total lie never happened fake news!  #2:  It happened, but it's not a big deal.  #3:  OK, it might be a big deal, but it isn't illegal.  #4:  OK, it's illegal but Hillary's emails!  Benghazi!  Obama!  #5:  Shutup you dang faggot libtard snowflake sore loser!

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Voiceless of the People 0

Share

Unredeemable 0

Evangelicals and GOP, holding newspaper with headline

Click for the original image.

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

A constituent writes an open letter to his Congressman asking why he refuses to do his job.

Share

So Much Winning . . . . 0

Farron looks gleefully at the track record of candidates endorsed by Donald Trump.

Share

Hey, Little Girl, Want Some Candy? 0

Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Sanity Claus.

Share

Immunity Impunity 0

Bob Egelko explores Donald Trump’s lawyer’s claims that, to paraphrase Richard Nixon, if the President does it, it’s not illegal. A snippet:

But there appears to be little support among legal analysts for the view that a president who corruptly interferes with an investigation of his administration would be immune from charges of obstructing justice.

“That would mean that if the police were corrupt, you could never investigate the chief of police,” said Hadar Aviram, a professor of constitutional law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. “The law enforcement system is not the private police of the president. It belongs to all of us.”

Share

The Voter Fraud Fraud 0

Thom and his guest discuss methods that Republicans use to steal democracy.

Share

What Is Truth? 0

Badtux wants to know.

Share

The Golden Fleecing 0

As Little Red Riding Hood approaches, Donald Trump, wearing a

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

News Hawks and News Hawkers 0

Dick Polman considers the source.

Share

Anatomy of an Apology 0

Share

Both Sides Not 0

Democratic Donkey reading headline,

Click for the original image.

Afterthought:

“Republican Family Values” has always been a con and a scam.

Republican politicians make “used car dealer” and “real estate developer” look like honorable professions.

Share

Unquestionable 0

Farron’s source for the story.

Share

All the News that Fits 0

In the Raleigh News and Observer, Edwin M. Yoder, Jr., considers the wasteland that constitutes contemporary news coverage in the United States. An excerpt:

At an end of term party (after leaving journalism, he taught at Washington and Lee–ed.) one of my bright students asked: “Are you aware, sir, that when you mentioned television news you invariably called it ‘the so-called news’?” I was unaware but not surprised. Even with ornaments like Cronkite, Brinkley and Sevareid, all originally schooled in print, the 15- to 30-minute programs offered only superficial glimpses of a complex world. “So-called news” indeed.

In those latter days of print supremacy, few foresaw the chaos generated today by “social media,” which is so often anti-social in effect. Add a twittering president who regards newspapers as “enemies of the people” and applies epithets worthy of a banana-republic caudillo to his critics : “the failing New York Times” and “the lying Washington Post.” Donald Trump is so prolific a source of fables and fantasies that the Post counts them in the hundreds. You needn’t be deeply schooled in psychology to identify his epithets as the projections of his own ingrained hostility to truth.

In a related article, Bella DePaulo attempts a taxonomy of Trumpian lies. A snippet:

As I read through Trump’s lies in the process of categorizing them, I realized I could not limit myself just to the categories of self-serving and kind lies. I had to add the category of cruel lies — lies that hurt other people or disparage or embarrass or belittle them. In the research my colleagues and I did, we found that only 1 or 2 percent of all lies were cruel. That’s why I wasn’t going to bother with them when coding Trump’s lies. . . .

Now let me tell you what I found when I tallied Trump’s cruel lies. Instead of adding up to 1 or 2 percent, as in my previous research, they accounted for 50 percent.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Unaccountable frolics.

Share

Cavalcade of Stupid 0

Dick Polman reviews this week of Republican antics.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.