Political Theatre category archive
Candidates in Absentia 0
Teabagger candidates put the lie to the saying, “You can run, but you can’t hide.” Alex Slater, writing at the Guardian, wonders where the yellers went:
The year of the missing Tea Party candidates has Washington observers scratching their heads for two reasons. First, is this the start of a trend where we’ll see statewide candidates guarded and shielded as much as presidential candidates? And second, how on earth are the Tea Party press handlers going to control their candidates who actually become elected officials?
The Tea Party candidates can run (literally), but they can’t hide forever. And once in the senate or the house chambers, they’re going to be unleashed to say whatever they want – usually, the first racist, bigoted or just idiotic pronouncement that comes into their minds.
Can’t Win for Losing, No Magic Wands Dept. 0
John Cole explains.
“Buying Democracy, One Race at a Time” 0
Details here.
CSA Propaganda 2
The South seceded from the union to protect and preserve the institution of chattel slavery.
Too many white Southerners not only refuse to admit that, but also lie about it to our children.
From today’s local rag:
That claim has been widely discredited, according to historians. Moreover, they say, it is often made by groups looking to rewrite history.
The book is being used by fourth-graders in Norfolk and fourth- and fifth-graders in Chesapeake. In Suffolk, it is not the official textbook, but it is used as a resource for fourth grade.
To countenance this lie is despicable. To spread it . . . .
Vivian Paige reacts.
The Politics of Hate 0
In the Guardian, Paul Harris considers the apparent increase in violence against gay men. I say apparent because, although there have been some high-profile incidents in the news, the statistics aren’t in as to whether the it’s the quantity or the reportage that has increased.
Rosie Swash muses on the relationship amongst hate, homophobia, and hard times. A nugget:
Flowback Teabags 0
In the Guardian, Gary Younge looks at the inconsistency between what teabaggers say they want and what they vote for. A nugget:
Plus Ca Change 0
Shorter Leonard Pitts, Jr.:
His column implies that Mr. Pitts, who is a perceptive thinker of good mind and kind heart, only recently read up on the Know Nothings.
The kinship between the ante bellum Know Nothings and the current ones has been obvious since the git-go to anyone familiar with that particular early manifestation of American bigotry and xenophobia.
Heck, I’ve been saying that of wingnuttery in all its forms since this blog was three months old.
Left-Wing Conspiracy Theory 1
Rather over-the-top methinks:
No, I think it’s because they know that fear clouds thought. They therefore promote fear, because clouded thought is their friend.
Finders Keepers, Not So Much 0
Not so far as the FBI is concerned.
All seriousness aside, this is the very portrait of the arrogance of the out-of-control.
This illustrates why we need the ACLU.
Helen Philpot on “Populism” 0
A nugget:
And let’s talk about that hatred. It seems so at odds with the supposed Christian morals they so proudly espouse. They hate big government but instead of taking issue with the largest part of that government – the military – they take issue with healthcare. They hate big government in healthcare but they have no issue with government being big enough to intervene in the private health decisions of a woman seeking to end a pregnancy or the private decisions of a husband wanting to end the decade long sufferings of his wife. They hate big government but they don’t seem to hate using government to legislate hate against homosexuals. And they hate big government, but they don’t seem to hate it when they can use it to fuel their hatred. Gosh I hate that…
That’s just the beginning. Read the whole thing.
Somehow Fitting 0
The 10th anniversary is traditionally the tinth anniversary.







