From Pine View Farm

Republican Hypocrisy category archive

A Picture Is Worth 0

Picture of Eric Cantor with caption:  House votes to cut food stambs by $40 billion so they can starve people into find work that isn't there.

Via Bartcop.

Share

“Heritage Care” 0

Via Delaware Liberal.

Share

Misdirection Play 0

I call shenanigans.

In a letter sent last week to President Obama, U.S. Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick contended that the Affordable Care Act had caused Sesame Place, one of Bucks County’s biggest tourist attractions, to terminate health benefits for its part-time employees.

“This law is hurting real people in my district and around the country,” the Bucks County Republican wrote.

A spokesman for SeaWorld, the amusement park’s parent company, confirmed Wednesday that the company was cutting the weekly work limit for part-time employees from 32 to 28 hours.

No, what’s causing the pain here is the refusal of employers to pay a living wage or to provide reasonable benefits.

To paraphrase Daffy Duck, they’re despicable.

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Income redistribution:  Republican looks at inequity and thinks

Via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.

Share

Night of the Long Knives 0

Chauncey Devega unloads on Republican efforts to destroy the food stamp program.

Here’s a snippet:

Last week, Republicans in the House of Representatives voted to cut 39 billion dollars from federal food assistance programs. Their vote is more than just the next act in the ongoing politics of cruelty by the Republican Party in the Age of Obama.

It is a decision to kill poor people.

In America, discussions of poverty are linked in the public imagination to stereotypes about race, class, and gender. The face of poverty is not white (the group which in fact comprises the largest group of recipients for government aid). Instead, it is the mythical black welfare queen, or an “illegal” immigrant who is trying to pilfer the system at the expense of “hard working” white Americans.

Discussions about poverty are also easily transformed into claims about morality and virtue. Consequently, while the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is very efficient and involves very little if any fraud on the part of its participants, stereotypes about the poor can be used to legitimate the policing and harassment of Americans in need of food support through mandatory drug testing and other unnecessary programs.

Here, the long-term end goal for Republicans is revealed for what it is—a desire to make being a poor person into a crime.

He’s quite correct, you know. The Republican positions on helping the poor cannot be separated from their decision, at the time Nixon initiated the odious Southern Strategy, to become the new Confederate Party. Witness this comparison of the Eisenhower platform with the Romney platform.

Do please read the rest.

Share

Groundhog Day 0

Share

The Party of Me Me Me 2

And this surprises you how?

Four Colorado Republicans who voted against a $50 billion federal relief bill to assist victims of Hurricane Sandy have asked the president for emergency aid to help clean up their state after devastating floods.

Share

Waffle House (and Senate) 0

Dick Polman recounts the attempts of hawkish Republicans to avoid the least appearance of agreeing with President Obama on Syria. A nugget; many more examples at the link.

For instance (and this is just a sampling), we have aspiring president Marco Rubio, who declared back in April that he was just as concerned as Obama about Syria’s use of chemical weapons; indeed, he endorsed Obama’s “red line.” The senator said: “It’s clear the ‘red line’ drawn by President Obama has now been crossed. The time for passive engagement in this conflict must come to an end….We must not allow Assad to continue violating all international norms by using these vile weapons and allowing Syria to descend further into chaos and instability. This will have disastrous consequences for U.S. interests for decades to come.”

Obama couldn’t have said it better. Rubio was calling for active American engagement, and we all know what he meant. But that was in April. In September, he supports passive engagement, or maybe no engagement. He says he is “unconvinced that the use of force will work.

Honest to Pete, if President Obama announced the discovery of a cure for cancer, Republicans would be agin’ it because Democrats.

Addendum:

Via Raw Story

Share

The Convenient Pacifist 0

Republican today, piously:

Via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.

Share

Table of Equivalents 0

Oliver Willis offers a flowchart to assist right-wingers in their desparate search for a white Trayvon Martin.

Chart for use by conservatives looking for a white equivalent to the Trayvon Martin Cast


Click for a larger image.

Share

Patterns 2

Share

IOKIYAR 0

Flag daze.

Share

Smoking Bananas 0

It’s a (Banana) Republican thing.

Let Noz explain.

Share

Reince Cycle 0

In a moment of accidental candor, he admits that he doesn’t know the truth.

Share

Class Acts 0

Little Ricky.

Share

High Hopes 0

Methinks he hopeth in vain.

After all, actions do speak louder than words, and the actions do speak.

I am a Southern boy. I knoweth bigotry when I seeth it.

Share

Cantor’s Cant 0

The Accidental Journalist.

Share

Damned If You Do . . . . 0

Republicans in 2012 (Benghazi):

Via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.

Share

Cooch and the Cuckoos on the Couch 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Marty Klein tries to understand Cooch and the Cuckoos pervy fascination with what other folks do in their bedrooms.

He concludes that it’s all about politics: creating a monster to hate so as to rally the troops.

A nugget:

The question for America (yet again) is about our desperate, recurring need to create a sexual “them,” an “other” whose sexuality is drastically different from ordinary people’s, and dangerous to everyone. So even though an overwhelming majority of American couples have oral sex at some point, millions of people around the country support outlawing it.

Politicians, religious leaders, and do-gooders use oral sex—and sodomy, non-monogamy, S/M, vibrator use, and other common erotic behaviors—as code for “those people aren’t like us,” even when “those people” ARE like us. In fact, they ARE us. But creating a dangerous, degenerate, out-of-control sexual “other” is such a dependable trope for motivating people, no political, religious, or civic leader can give it up. They are captivated by the power the trope gives them.

Follow the link for more.

Share

Sharia Scaria 2

A notable characteristic of Republicanism is a singular lack of self-awareness.

It enables and informs the hypocrisy.

Although this column is about a month old, it points this out starkly.

North Carolina state legislators introduced what was described as an anti-Sharia law bill this week. The concern was a religion would trump our laws—threaten our constitution. This religion, they fear, would dictate our rights and punish dissent. It would blur the lines between church and state! Women would be subjugated! This is such a threat North Carolina lawmakers must act posthaste!

Then with absolutely zero appreciation for irony, the state senate amended the bill to quickly and somewhat secretly restrict access to legal and constitutionally-protected abortion. Why?

Their religious convictions.

Do read the rest.

Via the Progressive Populist.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.