From Pine View Farm

Republican Hypocrisy category archive

In the Republican Twilight Zone 0

Republican Elephant sawing the wing off a airliner labeled

Click to view the original image.

Share

know Them by the Company They Keep Out 0

Methinks my old friend Noz makes a good point.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Little boy labeled

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

“Parents’ Rights,” Republican Style 0

Frame One:  Principal says to teacher,

Click to view the original image.

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

Joel Mathis takes a withering look at the hypocrisy of Josh Hawley’s response to Durham’s bull. Here’s a tiny bit from his article:

“You can’t interfere in a presidential election,” he said, “without consequences.”

Josh Hawley said that.

Josh Hawley. The same Josh Hawley who on Jan. 6, 2021, led Senate Republican efforts to block the certification of Joe Biden’s presidential victory, based on little more than Trump’s empty and baseless lies about the election.

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Standards Are Better 0

Share

A Notion of Immigrants 0

Republican Elephant thinks,

Click for the original image.

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

Karen Dolan of the Institute for Policy Studies argues that Republicans have a fluid definition of “decorum.”

Apparently, in Republicanese, a “breach of decorum” is “stuff we don’t like.” Here’s a bit from her article:

The majority white, male, heterosexual and cisgender Republican majorities in both statehouses are the status quo. With their supermajorities, they get to decide what “decorum” means.

And it’s an apparently flexible definition — Tennessee lawmakers refused to punish a colleague who was credibly accused of commiting child sexual abuse and another who was charged with domestic violence. Not even the member who allegedly urinated on another’s office chair was expelled for “breaking decorum.”

Share

Cancellation Nation 0

David explains how it’s right-wing snowflakes that are doing the cancelling in our culture.

Share

A Tune for the Times, Republican Family Values Dept. 0

Share

Freedom of Screech 0

Frane One, title:  Return of the Selective

Click to view the original image.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Sam and his crew discuss Republicans’ reactions to the verdict in E. Jean Carroll’s civil suit against Donald Trump.

Much like “responsible gun owner,” “Republican family values” is an oxymoron.

Share

Empty Gestures. Empty Hearts. 0

Man struggles in the ocean.  A second man, standing on a dock, says,

Via Yellowdoggranny.

Share

The Viciousness Cycle 0

PoliticalProf.

Share

Denial Is Not Just a River in Egypt 0

F. T. Rea is taken aback by aghast at Republicans who would assert that history isn’t.

Here’s a bit from his post:

To be a Republican history rewriter in good standing one must claim to believe that it’s best to ban books that present text and images that accurately portray American history, to do with slavery, the Civil War, the Jim Crow Era, the Civil Rights Era, etc.

Share

Florida Manchild 0

Share

Gutting Out the Vote 0

A caller talks with Sam about voter suppression shenanigans in Texas:

Oh! And speaking of Texas . . . .

Share

Courting Disaster 0

Empty binder labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

Title:  Deficit Attention Disorder.  Image:  GOP Elephant talking to therapist:  I obsess about the deficit when I'm out of power. I ignore it when I'm i power.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.