From Pine View Farm

“That Conversation about Race” category archive

All the News History that Fits 0

Hand and arm labeled

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

Via C&L, which has the transcript.

Share

Maskless Marauders 0

A maskless marauder incongruously assembled.

This is just mean for the sake of mean.

Share

Cancel Culture, Republican Style 0

Florida snowflakes want to cancel reality.

Share

A Question of Identity Politics 4

At the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Kevin McDermott has a wonder:

So — when Reagan, and then Trump, each limited the pool of acceptable candidates to only women, everyone was fine with it. (Democrats objected to Barrett’s specific record, not to Trump’s earlier vow to pick a woman.) But when Biden specifies it’s going to be a Black woman, suddenly Republicans find it “offensive” and “affirmative racial discrimination” and decry the “race/gender litmus test.”

What do you suppose is the difference here? . . .

Follow the link for his answer.

Share

Why Is the Elephant Afraid of the Maus? 0

At Boston.com. Northeastern professor Hillary Chute tries to answer that question. A nugget:

So when news broke of a school board in Tennessee banning the Holocaust graphic novel from its curriculum last week, citing language and its depiction of a naked woman (actually drawn as a mouse), she was troubled — but not especially shocked.

“I was surprised because it’s so ridiculous and the reasons given were so specious,” she says, “but in some ways I wasn’t surprised, because ‘Maus’ has always been a lightning rod.

(snip)

“So I can see why that would be an argument that is terrifying to people who want to deny that history happened, the way it happened, and so, in some ways I wasn’t surprised,” she says.

Share

“Laboratories of Autocracy” 0

Sam talks with David Pepper about how Republicans craft their skills to gut out the vote.

Share

Decoding De (Color) Code 0

Gordon Weil translates.

Share

Plus Ca Change 0

At The Roanoke Times, Jeff E. Shapiro argues that, in Virginia, it’s 1885 all over again.

Share

The Merch 0

Title:  Trump Post-Presidency Merchandise.  Image:  A tee-shirt with a picture of a noose bearing the words,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

The Politics of Moral (Pseudo) Panics 0

Thom wonders, “Who are they going after next?”

Share

Ipso Facto 0

The Arizona Republic’s E. J. Montini comments on a law progresssing through the Arizona legislature to ban teaching critical race theory in schools, where it is not taught. A snippet:

. . . as Victor Ray, a sociologist who works with the Brookings Institution, so succinctly points out, “Making laws outlawing critical race theory confirms the point that racism is embedded in the law.”

Share

Affirmation 0

At AL.com, Roy L. Johnson affirms the action.

That’s why I chuckle, at best, when the “affirmative action” is used as a weapon, when it is wielded to diminish or deflate.

More than once during my career I heard some form of this: “You’re really here because you’re Black.”

More than once did I respond: “And you’re really here because you’re white, so guess we’re even.”

Follow the link for the rest.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Those Who Ignore History . . . . 0

At AL.com, Auburn professor Elena Aydarova, descendant of emigrants from soviet Russia, writes of the hazards of pretending that what happened didn’t happen. Here’s bit of her article (emphasis added); follow the link for the rest.

As someone born in the Soviet Union, I have followed debates about bans on the teaching of “divisive concepts,” such as “race” or “sex,” with trepidation.

My family bears the memory of what happens when states weaponize such types of teachings. My great grandfather was executed in the Soviet purges of the 1930s – a time when anyone who disagreed with the state dictums paid the ultimate price. Among those who lost their lives were teachers, educators, academics, and researchers. My family rarely discussed his story, but I learned one important lesson to share with the world – when governments decide to ban academic theories and concepts because they are deemed as “divisive” and “dangerous,” they undermine democracy and pave the way for authoritarianism.

Share

The Fire This Time 0

Nazi Cat, looking at a pile of burning books, asks,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Decoding De (Color) Code 2

Frame One:  Ronald Reagan says,

Kathryn Rubino runs the numbers.

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Thought Police, Redux 0

Heaven forbid that students should be exposed to ideas and facts while at school.

We are a society of stupid.

Share

Freedom of Screech 0

At Above the Law, Joe Patrice explains that one thing is not like the other thing. An excerpt; follow the link for more.

. . . it’s not the same thing. Banning Maus . . . is a government action raising all manner of thorny constitutional issues because governments are obligated to represent everyone while Neil Young is a private actor telling another private actor that it can no longer profit off of his property.

Share

All That Was Old Is New Again, Reprise 0

The Arizona Republic’s Laurie Roberts celebrates an honest Republican. A nugget:

Finally, we have a Republican legislator who is honest about the party’s intentions with the dozens upon dozens upon dozens of bills aimed at “reforming” our elections.

“We should have voting, in my opinion, in person, one day on paper, with no electronic means and hand counting that day,” he said, during a Wednesday hearing on an election bill. “We need to get back to 1958-style voting.”

Ah yes, 1958, the golden era for those of a certain hue. The good old days when we could use literacy tests and poll taxes to keep certain people (you know who you are) from having a vote.

More celebration at the link.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.