From Pine View Farm

March, 2011 archive

Weaving Straw Basket Cases 1

At Philly dot com, Chris Kelly considers how straw men (straw persons? straw crows? straw scarecrows? strawcrows?) are created and used to distract us from what’s happening.

A nugget:

Even the most specious arguments are granted legitimacy simply for having been made. Every opinion, however uninformed, is seen as inherently valuable. No argument is too preposterous or dishonest to share. If you are shameless enough to stand up and say it, someone is bound to agree and pass it along.

It’s how Rush Limbaugh, who recently signed a $300 million contract to build and destroy legions of straw men every day, can claim he is a spokesman for the working class. It’s how Sarah Palin can be talked about as a serious candidate for president, and how a weepy basket case like Glenn Beck can be held up as the “only sane voice in the media.”

It’s how so-called conservatives can insist that the Wall Street bankers who crashed the economy should keep their astronomical bonuses, but unionized public employees should give up their hard-won pensions. It’s how President Obama can tap General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt to help “reform” the corporate tax structure, even as the New York Times reveals that GE – with worldwide profits of $14.2 billion last year – paid zero U.S. taxes.

Share

Zombie Lies Live Forever 0

Via TPM.

Share

QOTD 0

Franklin P. Adams:

The trouble with this country is that there are too many politicians who believe, with a conviction based on experience, that you can fool all of the people all of the time.

Share

History Lessons 3

There’s an old joke, likely apocryphal, from the WWII era which claims that Winston Churchill, when asked, “Will Americans ever have fascism?” responded, “Of course, but they will call it anti-Fascism.”

Which is a lead in to recommending this post by True Blue Texan, which also recalls the WWII era.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Add “Facebook depression” to potential harms linked with social media, an influential doctors group warns, referring to a condition it says may affect troubled teens who obsess over the online site.

Researchers disagree on whether it’s simply an extension of depression some kids feel in other circumstances, or a distinct condition linked with using the online site.

The story goes on to list the myriad dangers of Facebook. Only towards the end does a doctor get quoted to the effect that, to the extent that Facebook has an effect, it is limited to potentially exaggerating tendencies that already exist. I guess scary sells (it certainly sells in politics).

I certainly do not think Facebook is inherently a grand and glorious thing. It can be a useful tool for many things, including recreation and reconnection; as with other tools, such as a sledge hammer, one can just as easily drop it on one’s foot if one doesn’t pay attention.

(One of the dangers of making computers easy to use it has been that it has made them easy to use for everyone, including those who don’t bother to learn how to practice safe HEX.)

Every few years come alarms from “experts” about this thing or that thing which is ruining our youth.

When I was a young ‘un, it was comic books ruining our youth.

Then it was television, followed by long hair on boys, disco dancing, and video games.

It is, in fact, global warning. It has one constant: those issuing the warnings are rewarded with articles, interviews, and book contracts.

I am more optimistic.

I am confident that our youth are quite capable of ruining themselves without help.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Charlie Booker considers the twitting (and Facebooking) of Rebecca Black. A nugget:

Certainly, the more insecure the tweeter, the more unhinged their behaviour seems to be. Some of the most virulent Rebecca Black abuse came from teenage girls showing off to their mates by tweeting the singer directly to gloatingly wish death upon her.

Hilariously, many of them attacked the wrong Rebecca Black, and were actually beaming their hatred at an etiquette coach of the same name, a woman who regularly appears on US TV to discuss the merits of civil discourse. The worse their abuse, the more gracefully she responded, which somehow made them look infinitely more small-minded than they already were.

Share

Dreams Denied 0

I can’t say I’m as gloomy as Shaun.

But it wouldn’t take much more to get me there.

An excerpt:

The country that I have bled red, white and blue for is abandoning its youth, its elderly and its poor. It is imprisoning millions of its citizens for the most trivial of offenses.

It is suffocating its middle class, turning its back on newcomers and giving corporations and fat-cat financiers obscene tax breaks.

It is ignorant of its own history, core values and virtues, and many of us, if shown a copy of the Bill of Rights, would believe it to be a subversive document.

It has an unbreakable addiction to foreign oil, values clean air and water only when they don’t get in the way of profit making, and cares little that its infrastructure is crumbling one bridge at a time.

Share

Misdirection Plays 0

Gary Younge, writing at the Guardian, considers the dis-semblance (as opposed to resemblance) of the Republican Party to reasonableness, particularly the tendency to campaign as “conservatives” and to govern as gun-toting theocrats.

Strategically the division between social and fiscal conservatism has largely been settled. With just a few exceptions only social conservatives (anti-abortion, anti-gay marriage, pro-gun) can get elected within the Republican party, so it has ceased to be much of an issue in primaries. Once nominated, candidates stress only fiscal conservatism for fear of scaring away centrists. Once elected they emphasise both, evidenced by the growing efforts to restrict access to abortion by legislators who barely raised the issue of abortion on the stump.

It’s worth the three minutes it takes to read.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

I mentioned this when it first happened. Now the case proceeds towards trial.

The “manslaughter” case mentioned below involves another case of a hunter bagging one of those two-legged deer so easy to spot because of their distinctive orange vests, in case with a rifle. In the densely-populated suburban county in which the two-legged deer roam, hunting with a rifle is banned because, well, it’s a densely populated suburban county and a even a .22 calibre bullet can travel over a mile.

A nugget.

As the manslaughter case moves toward a May 31 trial date, much of the public’s attention may focus on how Groh was shot.

But from Manilla’s (the defendant–ed.) perspective, the greater concern is that he had a gun in the first place. As a felon – convicted of aggravated assault in 1985 – he is banned by law from possessing a firearm.

If convicted of involuntary manslaughter, a first-degree misdemeanor, Manilla faces up to five years in prison.

But he also faces three felony counts of illegal firearms possession for the guns he had with him in Bucks County. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 10 years.

And federal authorities may be looking into additional firearms charges.

He had about six dozen guns to keep himself felling warm and comfy and virile at night.

Share

The Galt and the Lamers 0

Bob Cesca shows why he is Han Solo.

Share

QOTD 0

David Brinkley:

Washington, D.C. is a city filled with people who believe they are important.

Share

Wishful Thinking 0

Bennett

Share

Bad Ideas Live Forever 0

In the Guardian, Walt Gardner looks at the history of “pay for performance” for teachers.

Early in my career with the railroad, I learned that, if one employee contravenes a policy, the employee is likely culpable; if the majority of employees contravenes a policy, the policy is likely wrong.

Aside from the overtly criminal (embezzlers, ponzi scheme managers, and other fraudsters), most working persons do not go to work planning to defraud their employers by performing their jobs badly. They may be intending other forms of misconduct while on duty and on the property, but they aren’t thinking something like, “I’ll just stock all the merchandise on the wrong shelves today.”

I’ve long had qualms about “pay for performance” for teachers and most of the other education “reform” schemes based on testing. As my mother, a math teacher, once said to me, “How can we expect them to read if there isn’t a magazine in the house?”

The reports of “teaching to the test” and fudging students’ scores are so numerous and so frequent as to indicate to me not a failure of school teachers and administrators, but the failure of the strategy.

Pay-for-performance began in England in about 1710, when salaries were based on test scores in reading, writing and arithmetic. The rationale was that it would help keep students from poor families in school, where they could learn the basics. The plan became part of the Revised Education Code in 1862, and remained on the books for more than 30 years.

The trouble was that the strategy sucked the creative life out of classrooms, as teachers became obsessed with the code. When it became apparent that the approach demeaned education, it was dropped in the 1890s. Pay-for-performance re-emerged briefly in Canada in 1876, but it ran into similar difficulties and was terminated in 1883.

Afterthought:

Ever notice how many bad ideas’ reason for existence is summed up in, “But we have to do something?

Share

Driving while Brown 1

The Chicago Tribune reports on a numbers game in McHenry County, Ill., west of Chicago, in which brown persons who spoke Spanish were listed as white, rather than Hispanic, on police officers’ traffic stop reports:

In examining department, state and court data from 2004 through 2009, the Tribune’s investigation indicated:

  • The problem grew worse each year. By 2009, the statistical analysis showed, 1 in 3 Hispanics cited by deputies likely were mislabeled as white or not included in department data reported to the state.
  • If mislabeling and underreporting are taken into account, the department’s official rate of minority stops would have towered over its Chicago-area peers rather than appearing average.
  • Department brass repeatedly missed warning signs of potential problems, even after a deputy complained that some peers targeted Hispanics.

Follow the link and draw your own conclusions.

Share

QOTD 0

Malcolm X:

You’re not supposed to be so blind with patriotism that you can’t face reality. Wrong is wrong no matter who does it or who says it.

Share

Foreign Policy Cred 0

Share

Shout Out 0

At Comically Vintage.

Share

March Madness (Updated) 0

The McCaffertys and at least seven other residents of Radnor Green and Ashbourne Hills received letters warning them this would happen. Police and Delaware Department of Transportation officials say their hoops, angled toward the street, violate the state’s Free Zone law, which prohibits hoops, trees, shrubs and other objects from being within seven feet of the pavement’s edge in subdivisions.

About 15 minutes after McCafferty climbed the pole by standing on top of her minivan, the DelDOT equipment rumbled toward her.

Perched on a bend in the metal pole with her fuzzy bedroom slippers dangling down, McCafferty refused to budge despite police and DelDOT pleas.

Police threatened to tow her van. They asked if she would miss work over this. She replied she “would be here all day,” no matter what. McCafferty heard threats that the hoop would come down whether she cooperated or not.

There’s a picture of her sitting on the basketball hoop at the link.

Most of the basketball hoops in question have been there for decades. The law banning them (and certain other things within seven feet of the pavement) was passed in 2005. (Hmmm, maybe I could have gotten the state to take down that tree I paid someone 400 smackers to take down in 2007 and saved a few bucks–it was about 18 inches back.)

I know that neighborhood well. When I lived in those parts, I had friends in Radnor Green. It’s quiet and secluded, with little traffic except when persons are leaving for and returning from work and school. The streets are wide and curvy, though not twisty, which keeps speeds down.

I can’t say that I believe pointing basketball hoops towards the street is a good idea, but, honestly (as my mother would have said).

When I went to Radnor Green, I would occasionally have to wait for kids playing ball to clear the street, but they usually seemed to do so without delaying me. I have also had to wait for kids on skateboards and bicycles to clear the street.

I know.

Let’s ban bicycles and skateboards.

While we’re at it, let’s just ban kids in suburban neighborhoods.

Addendum:

The local member of the Delaware House has asked the state police to look into how this was handled. From today’s follow-up story:

In a part of the confrontation captured on video by The News Journal, a woman who appears to be a state police trooper tells the McCafferty family that they can have their basketball pole back after DelDOT removes it from the ground.

Moments later, after the pole is removed and put into a truck, the same trooper denies she ever made such an offer.

John McCafferty said the woman never clearly identified herself or which agency she was with but just issued orders.

Back in my railroading days, I was involved in a long project with the railroad police which took me to railroad police offices all over the country.

I learned that the railroad cops–sworn officers, many with state and municipal experience–considered the Delaware State Police to insufferably arrogant and hated having to deal with them.

Share

Officer God Emperor 0

This headline makes me think of Dune:

Police seize spice in Newport News

Share

On! Wisconsin 0

Oh, look!

One-party rule.

Yet another shoe has dropped in the battle over Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) anti-public employee union law — with state Republican leaders now apparently defying or attempting to circumvent a court order that temporarily blocked implementation of the law.

Details at the link.

Also, Angry Black Lady’s post at Balloon Juice is worth a read. The excerpts from the opinion of the court order mentioned above are gems.

As Atrios points out, an executive that is determined to a court can finds a way.

I think it was Andrew Jackson who said, of a Supreme Court ruling, “They made the decision. Let them enforce it.”

Democracy is ultimately a contract among the governed and those who govern about how those who govern shall conduct themselves. If one party breaks the contract, they break democracy.

Share