From Pine View Farm

Geek Stuff category archive

No Place To Hide 0

At the Washington Monthly, Karina Montoya has a long and detailed article about how advertising strategy is changing once again. In the past decade, advertising moved to “social” media, with a disturbing side effect of eroding the business models of legitimate news organizations. Now, she argues, retailers are marketing personal information gathered through loyalty programs, credit card purchases, and the like to advertisers. The entire piece is worth a read, but this particular bit caught my eye:

Recently, I got curious about what CVS might know about me through my participation in its ExtraCare loyalty program. After accessing the CVS website, I requested the records it had about me. CVS—a conglomerate whose mergers and acquisitions include Aetna insurance, Caremark, and physician practices like Oak Street Health—knows a lot about me. In addition to my shopping history of the last 12 months, CVS knows my ethnicity, country of origin, household location, income level, types of credit cards, homeowner status, and interest in weight loss, vitamins, and natural foods. And there are little or no regulatory barriers to CVS using this data to sell me stuff or letting others use it to target me with ads.

Corporations, not the government, are your “surveillance state.” And we walk nekkid through its streets every day.

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm 0

Said algorithm engages those eyeballs and sucks them right down into a vortex of vile.

“Social” media isn’t.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

In Georgia, Mark Walters, who is apparently a local radio personality of some sort, has sued OpenAI for libel based on falsehoods propagated by ChatGPT, and Techdirt wonders whether the suit has a prayer. Here’s a bit from their article; follow the link for context.

Of course, all of this raises a bunch of questions: Is this actually defamatory? Is there actual malice? If so, who is legally liable?

And I’m not sure there are really good answers. First off, only one person actually saw this information, and there’s no indication that he actually believed any of it (indeed, it sounds like he was aware that it was hallucinating), which would push towards it not being defamation and even if it was, there was no harm at all.

Second, even if you could argue that the content was defamatory and created harm, is there actual malice by Open AI? First off, Watson is easily a public figure, so he’d need to show actual malice by OpenAI . . . .

Aside:

Whether Walters wins or loses, I doubt he’ll be the last to want a day in court with ChatGPT.

Share

Full-Face and Profiled 0

The EFF reports on a court’s finding about farcical recognition. A snippet (emphasis added):

In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.

Follow the link for details.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

In San Francisco, driverless cars are providing persuasive evidence that drivers are a valuable resource.

Afterthought:

Methinks one of the most striking characteristics of “Tech Bros”–and I’m referring specifically to that particular subset of the tech community–is their arrogance.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Peter Gärdenfors points out that (emphasis added)

Artificial intelligence (AI) has undoubtedly made remarkable progress in recent years, demonstrating its ability to process vast amounts of data and perform complex tasks. However, it is crucial to recognize that AI lacks a fundamental quality that humans possess: judgment.

Follow the link for his explanation of how he came to that conclusion and why he considers it important.

(Broken link fixed.)

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Security expert Bruce Schneier shares his take on AI. Given all the hoopla of the past couple of months, I think his piece is worth a read.

Share

A Question of Identification 0

Computer security expert Bruce Schneier reports that fingerprint logins may not be as secure as they are portrayed to be.

Share

Food for Thought, It’s All about the Algorithm Dept. 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Riccardo Dalle Grave discusses the association between “social” media and eating disorders in teens. He makes three main points; follow the link for his exploration.

  • The use of social networks is associated with body dissatisfaction and disordered eating.
  • Viewing and uploading photos and asking for negative feedback seem particularly problematic.
  • The parental role in ensuring their children’s safe and helpful use of social networks cannot be understated.

There’s nothing healthy about a culture which values self-promotion above all else.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

At Above the Law, Joe Patrice reminds us that, just because the machine said it, it ain’t necessarily so.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Given the hype nay, absolute swooning over “artificial intelligence,” I believe you will find the thoughtful discussion of it and of its implications on the latest Bad Voltage podcast to be well worth a listen.

Share

Geeking Out 0

I do likes me my purty pictures.

Screenshot

Click for a larger image.

Mageia v. 8 with the Fluxbox window manager. The wallpaper is from my collection.

Share

Bumps on a Head 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Stanley Finger tells the fascinating tale of how Mark Twain and Oliver Wendell Holmes took down phrenology con.

One wonders how they would deal with ChatGPT.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Rebecca Watson deflates a balloon of hype.

. . . or you can read the transcript.

Share

Artificial? Maybe. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Steve Wozniak is no longer fan of Elon Musk or Teslas. From SFGate:

“Boy, if you want a study of AI gone wrong and taking a lot of claims and trying to kill you every chance it can, get a Tesla,” he said, . . . .

Follow the link for context.

Share

Twits Own Twitter 0

The crazy just keeps getting crazier.

Share

Stray Thought 0

I do not think it an understatement to suggest that “social” media provides incentives that encourage persons to draw attention to themselves with statements of questionable veracity.

To put it another way, “social” media rewards liars for lying.

Share

Geeking Out 0

I do likes me my purty pictures.

Screenshot

That’s Mageia Linux v. 8 with the Fluxbox window manager.

Share

Kidnapped! 0

Michael Liedtke tells of his experience with a driverless cab in San Francisco.

Aside:

Ii am–er–let’s just say–highly skeptical that self-driving cars will be a thing.

Share

The Disinformation Superhighway 0

Pig:  How would you define the internet?  Rat:  How would I know?  I'm not some big technology guy.  Look it up in the dictionary.

Click to view the original image.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.