From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

Rules of Derangement, Reprise 0

Dan Simpson, writing at The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, also takes a shot at understanding Donald Trump. A snippet:

How do we make sense of Mr. Trump and his actions? Anyone who has been a parent knows that there often is one child at a play date who breaks all of the toys. In this case, among the toys getting broken are the U.S. justice system, America’s relationships with its allies and the morale of America’s armed forces, which were ordered to deter aspiring immigrants at the Mexican border and who missed Thanksgiving with their families so that Mr. Trump and Republicans could score political points.

Share

Rules of Derangement 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Stanton Peele offers three rules for predicting Donald Trump’s behavior, arguing that they are next to infallible. Here they are; follow the link for an explanation of each one:

  • Everything is a victory.
  • Any apparent shortfall is due to others.
  • Silence anyone who disagrees, or who violates rules 1 and 2.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

A Shining City on a Hill 0

Not.

Share

Do the Math 0

Graphic showing media figures, such as Ann Coulter, Glen Beck, and others, plus Fox News, adding up to produce Donald Trump.  Caption reads,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

“Values Voters” 0

Field looks at the Senatorial run-off in Mississippi (see the yesterday’s post of Mike Malloy’s comments about it) and cuts to the chase. An excerpt:

Roland Martin recently asked poor white people in Mississippi what they had to lose by voting for the democratic candidate. . . .

It’s an interesting question, but it misses the point of why they (poor white people) don’t vote for democratic candidates in the first place. There are a couple of reasons for that.

First, often times the democratic candidate is a person of color. —That happens to be the case in Mississippi now— Most of these people, regardless of what you hear from the main stream media, are just flat out racist, and there is no way in hell they are going to vote for a black man to be dog catcher let alone their senator. The Negro cannot represent them because he or she is not worthy. It must be someone who looks like they do, and who “shares their values”. It was racism not “economic anxiety” that drove all those poor white people to vote for trump.

Follow the link for the second reason.

Afterthought:

I may have told this story before, but it seems relevant.

When I was in college, my father told me a story told to him by the then-current Superintendent of Schools in my county (when I was in high school, he was a Phys. Ed. Teacher and coach, but he was the rare high school coach who could do more than coach). He was also a good and decent man who gave me my first baseball glove.

He and several other administrators had decided to drive to some school administrators’ convention of some sort in New Orleans. Note that this was at the height of the civil rights struggle of the 1960s. He told my father that, when they got to Mississippi, the atmosphere was so poisonous that they felt obliged to fake their Southern accents to sound more Southern than their Virginia Southern accents.

And this was a carload of white Southerners.

If Mississippi was able to make actual white Southerners fearful, well, words fail me.

Share

On the Trail 0

Title:  Detective-in-Chief.  Frame One:  It was just another typical day for me, the World's GREATEST (and only) President-Detective (Image:  Donald Trump in deerstalker hat.  Mike Pence says,

Click for the original image.

Share

“Appease in Our Time” 0

Tony Norman sees echoes of the past in Donald Trump’s decision to kowtow to Saudi Arabia and its murderous regime.

Share

Russian Impulses 0

Shaun Mullen is ever an optimist.

Share

Above the Fray (or Merely Obtuse?) 0

Giant image of Donald Trump holding

Click for the original image.

Share

Foul Ball 0

What the Booman said.

Share

Left on the Battlefield: Casualties of (Trump’s Trade) War 0

Share

Decoding De Code Meets Twits on Twitter 0

El Reg reports:

In a paper distributed through ArXiv earlier this month, researchers Sophie van der Zee, Ronald Poppe, Alice Havrileck, and Aurelien Baillon – from Erasmus University, Utrecht University, and École Normale Supérieure de Cachan – describe how they found significant linguistic differences between factually accurate and inaccurate Trump tweets, and used this finding to construct a language-based lie detection model.

The accuracy of their model was about 73 per cent, making it better than a coin-toss, but far from foolproof in its evaluation.

More at the link.

Share

Homecoming 0

Image:  Patch showing Republican Elephant wearing a helmet and holding a Corona beer labeled,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

Frame One:  Picture of office building labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

But the Emails! 0

Share

“If It’s Not One Thing, It’s Another” 0

Field is suffering from scandal overload.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

Thom traces the Republican Party’s path to becoming the party of the New Secesh.

Share

Truth in Labeling 0

Greg Sargent reminds us that Donald Trump

. . . is not putting America first. He’s putting his own naked self-interest over what’s good for America, . . . .

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

Pets 0

Vladimir Putin with a purring cat on each knee.  Putin says,

Click for the original image.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.