From Pine View Farm

Political Insults; Insulting Politics 2

The surest way to stop a real discussion of issues is to start insulting people; insults stop the brain from working.

I find myself both amused and dismayed these days when persons, usually of a right-leaning persuasion, accuse other persons, usually of a left-leaning persuasion but not always, of being “communists.” Communism is discredited and dead, dead, dead. But the insult still works–it brings reason to a halt.

Katrina Vanden Heuvel has a worthy suggestion in today’s Washington Post:

Here’s a modest proposal for improving national political discussion: Stop equating our opponents with famous dictators, their chief executioners, police apparatus or ideologies. I’m all for learning from history, but times are hard enough in American politics — with war, threats to national security, the greatest divide between rich and poor in our history and deep cultural divisions. Present differences deserve to be described in contemporary terms. The purpose of public speech is not just to restate anger but to clarify the principles and evidence that fuel it — in ways that invite discussion, not inhibit it. The demons are already among us — so let’s muster up some new analogies

Share

2 comments

  1. Opie

    March 26, 2006 at 7:10 pm

    Looks like “Hurricane Katrina,” as Rush loves to call her, got a whole column out of googling Hitler. But she’s right.

    Years ago, I was in a computer political debate network where we had this agreement that comparing the other guy to Hitler was kinda like hitting the 8-ball in too early: you lose on the spot.

    I admire her for finding that quote of Michael Savage comparing Soros to Goebbels. It’s the first time I have ever heard of Savage comparing someone to anyone BUT Hitler. (I have this deep suspicion that Michael Savage, if he has any political convictions at all, is actually a liberal, but plays a conservative on the radio and laughs all the way to the bank.)

    And as an aside, I hope Camille Paglia’s quote sounds better in context than it does in Katrina’s column. Snitches??? Do these professors think they shouldn’t be quoted? And if so, why?

     
  2. Frank

    March 27, 2006 at 6:57 pm

    I am unfamiliar with Katrina what’s-her-name; I just thought she had a point.

    I have heard of the Hitler thing. It’s called Godwin’s Law.

    Camille Paglia is a whackjob. She’s the Michelle Malkin of the left.

     
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.