January, 2007 archive
Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose 3
Dick Polman on being bushwhacked (again):
The first five slogans are inoperative. But tonight, in yet another allegedly pivotal speech on Iraq, President Bush will declare that the sixth slogan is now operative.
With scant seconds remaining on the game clock, and facing fourth down and 50 on his own five-yard line, Bush is determined to throw the ball deep and simply hope for the best. But at this point the odds are heavily stacked against an immaculate reception. (OK, that exhausts my ability to employ football metaphors. Everyone else seems to be using the poker analogy.)
It does take a fair amount of gumption to decree a new troop escalation, in the face of deep skepticism or outright opposition from, among others, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. John Abizaid, British ally Tony Blair, gung-ho conservatives like retired Lt. Col. Oliver North (“Sending more U.S. combat troops is simply sending more targetsâ€), the majority of the people in red-state Utah, the majority of ’06 midterm election voters (who mistakenly assumed that their votes would sway the Decider), at least 10 Republican senators, and a landslide majority of the American people (who are currently telling pollsters that Bush is wrong).
Therefore, one cannot reasonably imagine how the president expects to achieve victory in the art of public persuasion. His spokesman Tony Snow said yesterday that Bush needs to “bring the public back to this war and restore public confidence in support for the mission,†but it’s hard to see how he can pull that off, given the fact that at this point most Americans either disbelieve his arguments, or have simply tuned him out.
And don’t just take my word for it. Read this verdict: “He has little credibility left on Iraq.†That’s the word from David Keene, veteran conservative Washington activist and the longtime chairman of the American Conservative Union.
There is no game plan. The subs are exhausted. And the spectators are leaving the building.
Pop Quiz 0
Dan Froomkin asks whether the Current Federal Administrator will answer a few questions tonight. Here’s a couple or three of them:
* Will he be up front about who we’re fighting and why? Will he acknowledge that the chief mission of existing and supplemental troops will be fighting well-armed rival Muslim factions?
* Will he acknowledge how the mission in Iraq has changed, from ostensibly being about weapons of mass destruction all the way to tamping down a civil war?
* Will he address the hideously botched execution of Saddam Hussein, which provided such a gripping view of the vicious sectarianism plaguing the country?
* Will he acknowledge that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has repeatedly made promises and not delivered in the past, and explain why he trusts Maliki this time?
* Will he acknowledge that Iraqi forces have never taken their share of the responsibility in Iraq, and that training has thus far been problematic?
* If he says this is a turning point, will he explain why, in contrast to all the previous turning points, he believes this one is for real?
In short, will he try a little honesty.
Me, I’m not bothering to stay up. The suspense is not killing me.
But it’s killing a whole lot of other people in a land far far away.
Home Improvement Dept.: Sewer Late Than Never (Updated) 8
During the interregnum between my old job and my new one, I’ve been trying to take care of some needed tasks. I’ve had two trees taken down and I’m trying to get a new sewer line put in. The old one has serious issues beyond the scope of counseling. I sent it to the SAP (Sewer Assistance Program), but it relapsed.
At this point the project has been scheduled three times.
And postponed three times.
Due to rain.
We’re trying again Wednesday.
Given this track record, the plumber and I agreed today that neither one of us should go buying any lottery tickets.
Addendum:
Plumbed
Punditry 0
Not only are the rats deserting the sinking ship, they are pretending they were never on it in the first place. Glenn Greenwald demonstrates in Pat Buchanan’s American Conservative. Follow the link the see him skewer them with their own words:
Yet there seems to be no accountability for these pro-war pundits. On the contrary, they continue to pose as wise, responsible experts and have suffered no lost credibility, prominence, or influence. They have accomplished this feat largely by evading responsibility for their prior opinions, pretending that they were right all along or, in the most extreme cases, denying that they ever supported the war.
Bringing New Meaning to the Phrase, “Wild Card Game” 3
According to an ad on craigslist.org, a “very attractive younger couple, both in grad school” are willing to let a complete stranger watch them have sex in exchange for two tickets to tomorrow’s playoff showdown between the Birds and the New York Giants.
The couple, who say they couldn’t afford the steep ticket prices, are even willing to let the ticket-holding voyeur call the plays for their bedroom romp.
Looks like unsportsmanlike conduct to me.
You Have No Life 1
You belong to George.
The President asserted his new authority when he signed a postal reform bill into law on Dec. 20. Bush then issued a “signing statement” that declared his right to open people’s mail under emergency conditions.
That claim is contrary to existing law and contradicted the bill he had just signed, say experts who have reviewed it.
Warrant, shwarrent. He’s only the Preznit of the NooNited States. Why the heck should he have to obey the law?
All joking aside, does he not recognize the difference between Imperator and President? The underlying assumption of the Rule of Law is that persons should not be able to do whatever the heck they want to do, just because they want to do it.
Where there is no respect for the law, there is lawlessness.
Apparently, this concept was not taught at Yale. Or maybe it was only taught at the classes the Current Federal Administrator chose to cut.
The Current Federal Administrator has no respect for the law; indeed, he thinks he is the law, sort of like Louis “L’etat c’est moi” XIV. Since he thinks he is the law, we therefore suffer under the rule of lawlessness.
Each day of Bushness, I think that no more outrages can be committed.
Each day of Bushness, I am disabused of that thought.
My ancestors fought in the Revolutionary War.
They did not fight so that the government could arrogate to itself the right to read mail–or eavesdrop on conversations, or peek through windows–without having to show cause and obtain warrants.
Pah! I am sickened.
Sickened beyond imagining.
They Did It. In Our Name, They Tortured People. 0
Are torturers the kind of folks you want running this country?
Documents released Tuesday by the FBI offered new details about the harsh interrogation practices used by military officials and contractors when questioning so-called enemy combatants.
The reports describe a female guard who detainees said handled their genitals and wiped menstrual blood on their face. Another interrogator reportedly bragged to an FBI agent about dressing as a Catholic priest and “baptizing” a prisoner.
Some military officials and contractors told FBI agents that the interrogation techniques had been approved by the Defense Department, including directly by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
The documents were released in response to a public records request by the American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing Rumsfeld and others on behalf of former military detainees who say they were abused. Many of the incidents in the FBI documents have already been reported and are summarized in the ACLU’s lawsuit.
Kabul 0
In my younger days, Kabul meant the best hash.
In First Son’s day, it means his next assignment. He is mobilizing.
To hold on to the job that the Current Federal Administrator chose not to finish so that he could, instead, make up a war in Iraq.
And, in the meantime, Afghanistan slips back into the grip of the Taliban, because the Current Federal Administrator chose not to finish the job.
Failure 0
Andrew Sullivan (emphasis added):
(snip)
The moral cost of withdrawal is huge. We should do all we can to provide amnesty for any Iraqis who have been loyal to us. (It does not surprise me that we shamefully haven’t. This is the Bush administration.) But the moral cost of plowing on is also exponential. It may merely delay the day of reckoning. It risks sending young Americans to die in order for a president to save face, not in order to win. The truth is: we have lost this battle, if not the war. I am still inclined to believe such a loss was avoidable. The amazing restraint of the Shia for so long, and the enthusiasm for elections, revealed the potential in Iraq for a breakthrough. But this president threw it away. There is no getting around this, I’m afraid. It is reality. And if we do not get out by June, I fear an even worse one.
But the Conductor sings his song again . . .
Pot. Kettle. Black. 0
Republicans play “Poor Me.”
Digby lays it out.
Of course, we will not notice that they are in the minority because they failed in their stewardship of the nation and earned the rejection they received at the polls.
Good heavens, no. Their performance can have nothing to do with their current minority status.
Gosh. Jeez. Perish the thought.
Milestone 0
Today I met with the outfit I’m going to be working for and signed a letter of agreement and a W-9.
Thursday, we are meeting with the client on my first project. Sometime later this month, I should actually start racking up “billable hours.”
After two months of unemployment, I’m not sure how I will find the time to actually (gasp!) do work. And I have to be ready to leave the house at 7:30 a. m. Thursday.
People say that wealth doesn’t buy happiness.
I would be grateful to have the opportunity to test that platitude.
I sure as heck bet it could buy peace of mind.