October, 2009 archive
QOTD 0
From Thomas Browne via the QuoteMaster:
Be charitable before wealth makes you covetous.
Interesting.
The poor want enough.
It is the rich who want more.
And it is therefore the poor whom the rich vilify for wanting.
Magickal Fiduciary Thinking 0
I suspect that the poll results cited below are not atypical.
Persons think that government is able to give them something for nothing.
From a poll in Virginia:
Almost one of every four likely voters indicated that if the state needs to make more budget cuts, they want to start with transportation spending.
In other words, if it’s broke, don’t ask me to help fix it.
Even though I use it every day.
In other news, for example:
QOTD 1
Logan Pearsall Smith, via the Quotemaster:
Most people sell their souls, and live with a good conscience on the proceeds.
The Terror-Industrial Complex 0
The Booman mines a nugget from a two-year old interview with Colin Powell:
We Need Single Payer 0
“It’s smoke and mirrors. It’s bogus. And it’s all too familiar. Every time we get close to passing reform, the insurance companies produce these phony studies as a prescription and say, ‘Take one of these, and call us in a decade.’ Well, not this time.”
It really is all about their country club memberships.
Via Balloon Juice.
Deficit Thinking 1
Just a friendly reminder:
This was caused by Republican ideology, profligacy, and mismanagement:
And their only prescription is more of the same what got us here.
Peeking under the TARP 0
Many have theorized that one reason the Bush administration gave so much TARP money to so many banks, including those who protested that they didn’t need it, was that the Treasury Department didn’t want to reveal who was in the biggest trouble. (For example, follow this link and listen to Hour One, October, 6, 2009, or click here to listen to the mp3.)
If this were indeed the case, I guess now we have a hint who they were protecting:
Flagging Management Overreaction 0
Stupid, but typical of American management:
I saw this type of stuff a lot when I worked for large organizations. Someone does something improper, as in the backstory to this, displaying a cartoon that someone else felt had racist implications.
Rather than dealing with the issue–the cartoon–management makes a blanket rule, no locker decorations. It is classic “punish everyone rather to avoid dealing with the problem.”
At one of the large organizations I worked at, long business trips–often a week or more–were frequent. Employees on trips over five days were allowed to get their laundry done at the hotel.
Now, anyone who has ever used a hotel laundry service knows it is expensive. You are paying, not just for the laundry, but for the hotel to hold the laundry for pick-up, for someone to pick up and deliver the laundry from the plant, and for the hotel to hold the laundry for you to pick up when your work day is over (in some cases, even deliver it to your room), all on the same day.
Then management discovered that one person (who happened to be part of my little department) was bringing his laundry from home to be done on expense–he commonly was putting in for laundry bills in excess of $100.00 ($25.00 to $30.00 was typical for four days worth of laundry back then).
His manager should have been raked over the coals for approving the darn expense reports in the first place. Instead, management responded by disallowing laundry service on all expense reports without advance permission from God.
That’s when we started washing out our skivvies in the hotel sinks (hotel shampoos double effectively as laundry soap).
Now, I’m not a big fan wearing American flag lapel pins or other American flag stuff; ostentatious displays of the symbols of patriotism often fall into the “Methinks thou dost protest too much” category. I have found that those who ostentatiously display the flag on their clothing or belongings often do so in support of distinctly unAmerican ideas.
Besides, most of wearable flag stuff violates flag etiquette (which mandates, among other things, that the flag or representations thereof should not be used as wearing apparel).
But this is a loser for the management of the Chester City Fire Department.
Dustbiter 0
There’s one less bank in the San Jaoquin Valley:
I’ve been to the San Jaoquin. Having seen it is one reason why I never understood the fascination persons have with Lalaland.
Oh, My 0
I thought this was settled 30 years ago.
Facebook Weirdness: Nobel Peace Prize Dept. 0
I am a member of this group on Facebook:
(Aside: And I do support the prize. Even though I think it was premature, as I said, it would be incredibly churlish not to support the receipt of such an honor by one of one’s fellow countrymen–but we have no shortage of incredible churls. And, despite the gnashing of churlish teeth, a Nobel Prize is not the type of thing that one turns down.)
The page was created by a fellow from Philly whom I know from DL.
Here’s what’s freaky:
When I Google “We Support President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize,” the link that comes up, awash in all the news links, is the URL for the Canadian Facebook page in French; the page itself is not translated, but the American English headers are replaced with French ones.
Here’s the link again:
http://www.fr.facebook.ca/group.php?gid=180691720019&ref=share
(Aside: Microsoft’s Bing! couldn’t even find that.)
The American English page does not show seem to appear in the first three pages or so of the Google results. Does this mean more French-Canadians than others are searching for the topic?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Still over half a million. The press seems to defining “less bad” as “good.”