Spill Here, Spill Now 0
Michael Tomasky in the Guardian echoes what I said yesterday about there being no federal apparatus for taking over attempts to contain the BP’s wild well. (Note: His statement in the third paragraph of the excerpt is mistaken; there certainly have been other spills and accidents and even a blowout or two, but not in this scale):
In other words, with Katrina, we had a system in place to prevent it, and it failed. Here, we didn’t even have a system in place.
Why not? I don’t know the history, but I would guess that having such a system in place was deemed too expensive, and the risk of disaster too low. It is worth remembering that there are 15,000 extant offshore oil operations around the shores of the US, and there’s never been an accident until this one.
If we want such an agency, then fine, let’s spend the money and employ the manpower and buy the equipment necessary.
(snip)
That said, Obama has a failure here. It’s not as a manager but as, what shall I call it, emoter-in-chief, often more important. As he has in previous instances as president, he has failed in grasping and expressing the basic outrage of the average person.
As John Cole says (read the whole post),
Certainly, there is reason for anger and there are nits to pick with Obama and the administration’s reaction, but this spill results from the incompetence of the drillers compounded by Bushie deregulation. Furthermore, any action must be within the law and within the possible.
We have just had an administration that disregarded the law and ignored the possible. We don’t need another.
Taking the anger out on Mr. Obama may satisfy emotionally–anger with a target always satisfies more than anger without one (that’s why wingnuts prefer to make personal attacks)–but it is blaming the crossing guard for being in the path of the runaway truck.
The last crossing guard caused the runaway. Blaming the new one may provide catharsis, but it doesn’t stop the truck.