From Pine View Farm

October, 2010 archive

Americans Lead the World in Remaking Themselves 0

Science 2.0 (Scientific Blogging under a new name) reports that the United States has more plastic surgeries (“procedures” if you want to pretend they aren’t “operations”) than any other country.

It does not surprise that the majority are cosmetic. Worldwide rankings of the top procedures are:

For the last ten years, the consensus has been that breast augmentation was the most popular plastic surgery procedure but the ISAPS Global Survey puts liposuction at the top, representing 18.8% of all surgical procedures, followed by breast augmentation at 17%, and blepharoplasty (upper or lower eyelid lift) at 13.5%, rhinoplasty (nose reshaping) at 9.4% and abdominoplasty (Tummy Tuck) at 7.3%.

The popularity of surgical procedures varied by country with Brazil, the United States, China, Mexico, India and Japan the dominant countries for the top five procedures.

(snip)

The top five non surgical procedures are: toxins or neuromodulators injections (Botox, Dysport) (32.7%), hyaluronic acid injections (20.1%), laser hair removal (13.1%), autologous fat injections (taking a patient’s fat from one location and transferring it in the same patient in another location) (5.9%) and IP Laser treatment (4.4%).

Lots of money for not much of anything, if you ask me. Or even if you don’t.

Share

“Take No Prisoners” (Updated) 0

This does not seem right (emphasis added).

A US gunship crew was cleared to attack two insurgents on the ground even though the pilots had reported that the men were trying to surrender, the leaked Iraq war logs reveal.

The Apache helicopter pilots killed both Iraqi men after being advised by a US military lawyer that they could not surrender to an aircraft and therefore remained valid targets. A leading military law expert consulted by the Guardian has questioned this legal advice.

Follow the link. Read it all.

Aside:

No wonder the Pentagon wants to keep this stuff secret. Claiming that it endangers lives in the future is sophistry.

It endangers careers in the now.

Addendum, Slightly Later:

The Guardian comments (emphasis added):

Most of the official justifications for war, on grounds of security from terror and weapons of mass destruction, have been discredited. The only element of moral authority left in the decision might be that Saddam Hussein ran a murderous regime, characterised by torture and extra-judicial killing. It could indeed have been the duty of western powers to intervene against such atrocity. But the western occupiers quickly became complicit in atrocities of their own, as new leaked military documents reveal.

(snip)

But each extra piece of evidence builds a portrait of a military occupation deeply implicated in practices that were illegal under international law and unconscionable in the eyes of any reasonable observer.

The terrible truth about British and American involvement in Iraq seems increasingly to be that it was not just a strategic failure, it was, for the occupying powers, a moral catastrophe.

Share

The Galt and the Lamers 0

Wasserman:

Macho Men

Share

Unknown States 0

I dreamt I was up all night repairing a car.

Now I don’t know whether I’m tired or rested.

Share

QOTD 0

Voltaire:

All murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets.

Share

Season’s Over 0

Thank you, Phillies, for a great run.

Share

Foreclosure Fraud 0

Tom Levenson digs into the implications. A nugget:

But for all the justified outrage at the simple disdain for the concept of property rights and the rule of law* there’s something else being missed here, something that astute observers have commented on, but that seems to be a bit obscured as we all, understandably, rubberneck in horror at the trainwreck that the major banks have made of the foreclosure process.

And that is that the entire foreclosure endeavor is in fact a huge imposed cost on American homeowners and our economy; it almost certainly runs against the long-term interests of the financial system as whole, whatever the incentives may be for individual companies (and it may well be a long term fail for many of the short-term beneficiaries as well). Foreclosure as it is being practiced now is likely to be a net negative for homeowners now, to the point that subsidizing in some way those who got into trouble is economically rational, even if it might be galling to those who’ve paid up and gone about their business.

The entire post is worth the five minutes it takes to read.

Share

Republican Economic Theory, A Picture Is Worth Dept. 2

Making the rich richer:

Making the Rich Richer

Via Bob Cesca.

Share

The Nation’s Bidness, Citizens Benighted Dept. 0

Lukovich:

For Sale

Share

Voting Is Not a Right. It Is a Duty. 0

Yes, it is difficult not to be cynical.

Be as cynical as you wish, but vote. Michael Roth explains why in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

But cynicism about politics and the public sphere doesn’t lead to efforts to change the way things are. Instead, it leads to a withdrawal from public life, a withdrawal that is justified by the cynic’s belief in his or her own superiority. We cynics know better, and we know that participation in public life is for those who just don’t understand the ways things really work.

Share

“The Confidence Fairy” 0

Paul Krugman reports on the austerity myth. A nugget:

In the spring of 2010, fiscal austerity became fashionable. I use the term advisedly: The sudden consensus among Very Serious People that everyone must balance budgets now now now wasn’t based on any kind of careful analysis. It was more like a fad, something everyone professed to believe because that was what the in-crowd was saying.

And it’s a fad that has been fading lately, as evidence has accumulated that the lessons of the past remain relevant, that trying to balance budgets in the face of high unemployment and falling inflation is still a really bad idea. Most notably, the confidence fairy has been exposed as a myth.

Share

“Move Along, Nothing To See Here” 0

Nothing in the latest Wikileaks release not already known or suspected.

The Great and Glorious Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq was conceived in mendacity and deceit, which propagated themselves with greater wrongs.

It was evil, sin, done in our name.

Share

QOTD 0

Doris Lessing, from the Quotemaster (subscribe here):

As you get older, you don’t get wiser. You get irritable.

Share

Dustbiters 0

You can longer bank on these. They ain’t no more.

The FDIC was hungry.

Share

And Now for Something Completely Different 0

Share

Candidates in Absentia 0

Teabagger candidates put the lie to the saying, “You can run, but you can’t hide.” Alex Slater, writing at the Guardian, wonders where the yellers went:

These candidates have taken to such tactics as dashing from buildings to unmarked cars in order to avoid the press, using decoy cars to divert the attention of waiting crowds, literally sprinting away from cameras, even asking reporters to submit their questions in writing so they can get neat, perfectly drawn-up answers in return that come not from the candidate, but from press secretaries.

The year of the missing Tea Party candidates has Washington observers scratching their heads for two reasons. First, is this the start of a trend where we’ll see statewide candidates guarded and shielded as much as presidential candidates? And second, how on earth are the Tea Party press handlers going to control their candidates who actually become elected officials?

The Tea Party candidates can run (literally), but they can’t hide forever. And once in the senate or the house chambers, they’re going to be unleashed to say whatever they want – usually, the first racist, bigoted or just idiotic pronouncement that comes into their minds.

Share

Can’t Win for Losing, No Magic Wands Dept. 0

John Cole explains.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Phantom Facebook user brings police to school:

Clearview Superintendent John Horchak III said the students reported the posts around Tuesday to school officials, who alerted police.

The person posting the comments called himself David Prezet, according to students, and students were concerned Thursday because the poster indicated he was coming to the school that day.

Horchak said the poster claimed he was going to enroll that day. That did not happen, nor is there a student at the Mullica Hill school by that name, the superintendent said.

It started with friend requests. Once the poster had a number of “Facebook friends” amongst the students, the posts turned creepy–from the story, apparently more nasty than threatening.

Having been a teenager and (probably contrary to the theories of my children, being able to remember what it was like) I suspect the posts were pretty creepy to motivate the kids to complain to the administration.

Why can’t they be like we were, stealing the occasional stop sign and tping the occasional teacher’s yard and driving fast on back roads on dark nights perfect in every way?

Share

“Buying Democracy, One Race at a Time” 0

Details here.

Share

Flag Ettiquette 0

My two or three regular readers know that one of the things that frosts my cupcake is abuse of the American flag.

It was the subject of one my earliest posts. I have even had a letter to the editor of the local rag published on the matter.

Which raises the question:

Why are those who claim most loudly and vociferously to revere the United States of America and its symbols the first to show them disrespect?

It’s Matthew 6:5 all over again once more redundantly.

Share