From Pine View Farm

February, 2022 archive

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Maskless Marauders 0

A maskless marauder incongruously assembled.

This is just mean for the sake of mean.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Politeness is a challenge.

The stupid. It metastasizes.

Share

President Sisyphus 0

Joe Biden pushing a coronavirus up a hill against the rear end of a Republican Elephant as the Elephant says,

Click to view the original image.

Afterthought:

It does rather boggle the mind that Republicans have aligned themselves with an infectious disease as a political strategy.

Share

Pinkertons of the Digital Age 0

In case you aren’t clear on the “Pinkertons” reference . . . .

Share

“But There’s No Other Possible Explanation,” Reprise 0

Psychologist Richard Lettieri explores factors that may predispose persons to fall for embrace conspiracy theories. He identifies five specific characteristics:

  • Strong group identity.
  • An authoritarian disposition.
  • A narrow definition of masculinity.
  • Low level of epistemic rationality.
  • Insecure attachment.

Follow the link for a detailed discussion of each one.

Share

Dis Coarse (Legitimate Political) Discourse 0

The Arizona Republic‘s E. J. Montini notes that, in censuring Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger for agreeing to serve on the January 6 Committee of the House of Representatives, the notice of censure referred to the January 6 insurrection as “legitimate political discourse.” In the light of that, Montini has some questions for Republicans.

Here are two of them; follow the link for the others.

One might ask, for example, “Do you consider using bear spray on law enforcement officers legitimate political discourse?” Because that happened on Jan. 6 at the U.S. Capitol.

And, “Do you believe that legitimate political discourse includes defecating in the Capitol and then spreading the feces in the hallways?” Because that also took place.

Share

QOTD 0

Bertrand Russell:

No nation was ever so virtuous as each believes itself, and none was ever so wicked as each believes the other.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Cosplayers in Camouflage 0

Dan Casey comments on a self-styled militia.

Just read it.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Farron discusses the implications of defining armed insurrection as “legitimate political discourse.”

We are a failing state.

Share

Cancel Culture, Republican Style 0

Florida snowflakes want to cancel reality.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Yet another responsible gun owner shoots himself while fondling–er–cleaning a gun.

(Open tag corrected.)

Share

A Question of Identity Politics 4

At the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Kevin McDermott has a wonder:

So — when Reagan, and then Trump, each limited the pool of acceptable candidates to only women, everyone was fine with it. (Democrats objected to Barrett’s specific record, not to Trump’s earlier vow to pick a woman.) But when Biden specifies it’s going to be a Black woman, suddenly Republicans find it “offensive” and “affirmative racial discrimination” and decry the “race/gender litmus test.”

What do you suppose is the difference here? . . .

Follow the link for his answer.

Share

The Litmus Test 0

Michael in Norfolk cuts to the chase.

Now, the single test to be a Republican is worship of and self-prostitution to Donald Trump, a man devoid of any priciples save self-promotion and lying incessantly.

Follow the link for his evidence.

Share

QOTD 0

E. C. Bentley:

Each time, he had turned the conversation with the ingenuity born of fear.

Share

“But There’s No Other Possible Explanation” 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Arthur Dobrin points out that conspiracies are, in a legal context, real things; persons can be charged with and convicted of conspiracies in a court of law. He suggests that these real-life conspiracies differ wildly from the many false conspiracy theories that litter our discourse and pollute our polity.

He goes on to offer some pointers for distinguishing between the two. Here’s one; follow the link for the others.

2. Can the claim be disproved? In science, this is called the Falsification Principle. But this approach can also be applied to weighing the validity of conspiracy claims. In a court of law, the government attempts to prove the validity of its charges while the defense tries to dispute the charges. A judge or jury then decides, either by the preponderance of the evidence in a civil case or beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal suit. By contrast, no matter how many facts are presented contrary to a conspiracy theory, for example, the U.S. government complicity in the 9/11 attack, conspiracy theorists remain convinced of their “truth” and will introduce yet more speculation or convoluted explanations to maintain that “truth.”

Share

The New Gilded Age 0

Last week, I mentioned a column by Greg Kesich in which he expressed a fear that we are entering a new “Gilded Age.” At the time, I said I thought we were already well into it.

Well, my two or three regular readers, I rest my case.

Share

Big Bungee 0

Man:  Gravity is a hoax.  Sparky:  Big if true.  How did you figure this out?  Man:  I saw some Facebook memes and watched a Youtube video.  Sparky:  I see.  But who profits from this vast conspiracy?  Man:  All the gravity-based industries, of courses.  Like ski resorts and bungee-jump operators.  Sparky:  And they're doing it right out in the open.  Man:  That's why you have to do your own research and not fall for lies being spread by Big Bungee.  Sparky:  Buy why are we not floating off into space right now?  Man:  Because barometric pressure is pressing down on us from above.  Duh.  Second man interrupts:  Excuse me.  I've never heard anything so absurd.  This man is delusional.  The internet has poisoned his brain.  The real answer is centripetal force.  First man:  Ha Ha.  Get a load of this guy.  Sparky:  Much to consider.

Click for the original image.>

Share

The Voting Fraud Fraudster 0

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.