From Pine View Farm

Enforcers category archive

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

Among other things, Thom and former FBI agent Mike German discuss the origins of the Second Amendment. It’s likely not what you expect it to be and certainly not what the NRA and its dupes, symps, and fellow travelers would want you to think.

Frankly (I do everything frankly), it rather took me aback, but it did not surprise me.

Share

She Is Accused of a “Terroristic Threat” 0

Thom wanders, where’s the threat?

Share

Immunity Impunity 0

Suffer the children.Get out of Jail free card

Share

Keystone Kops of the Kali Kind 0

Even Mack Sennett could not have made this up.

Share

Disparate Treatment 0

At the San Francisco Chronicle, law professor Samantha Buckingham wonders how Donald Trump’s numerous criminal trials might have gone if he were not protected by his (reputed) wealth.

Share

The Surveillance Society 0

Joanna Pozzulo, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, warns about the increasing use of automated surveilance technology, particularly facial recognition. She points out that, despite the faith that persons put in these machines, they are by no means infallible.

She makes three main points:

  • Surveillance cameras are becoming ubiquitous with facial recognition software often present as well.
  • The accuracy of facial recognition significantly decreases for women, young adults, and racialized people.
  • Mistaken identification can lead to wrongful prosecution and conviction.

Given the proliferation of these technologies, I think her piece is well worth a read.

Share

Fiction Comes Alive 0

And you thought that the Keystone Kops were just something from old movies that your grandparents watched on black and white telly visions.

Nope. They are very real and may be at your doorstep today.

Share

Shotspitter 0

The EFF has long warned of the dangers of certain technologies with which law enforcement seems enamored, such as shotspotter and facial recognition. Here’s a bit from their latest article on the topic:

On January 25, while responding to a ShotSpotter alert, a Chicago police officer opened fire on an unarmed “maybe 14 or 15” year old child in his backyard. Three officers approached the boy’s house, with one asking “What you doing bro, you good?” They heard a loud bang, later determined to be fireworks, and shot at the child. Fortunately, no physical injuries were recorded. In initial reports, police falsely claimed that they fired at a “man” who had fired on officers.

In a subsequent assessment of the event, the Chicago Civilian Office of Police Accountability (“COPA”) concluded that “a firearm was not used against the officers.” Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling placed all attending officers on administrative duty for 30 days and is investigating whether the officers violated department policies.

Follow the link for context.

Share

Suffer the Children 0

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.

Words fail me.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

A Tennessee police department found out the hard way that, even though a frolicker posts something stupid and disrespectful and insipid, it ain’t inherently a crime.

We are becoming an uncivil society. And “social” media is accelerating our desce–oh, never mind.

Share

Immunity Impunity 0

In related news . . . .

Share

Immunity Impunity, Rule of Lawless Dept. 0

Read the news report that Farron discusses.

Share

A Notion of Immigrants 0

The Philadelphia Inquirer’s Will Bunch makes a strong case that Texas Governor Abbott is simply being mean for the sake of mean.

I think a pretty strong case can be made that, if the majority of immigrants at our Southern border were white like me, they’d not be greeted with such hostility.

Share

Freedom of Suppress, Updated 0

Read more from Wichita, Kansas, NPR station KMUW.

Addendum:

And here’s an update from the Kansas City Star.

Share

Presumed Guilty 0

I wonder just why oh why something like this could have happened?

Share

Full-Face and Profiled 0

The EFF reports on a court’s finding about farcical recognition. A snippet (emphasis added):

In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.

Follow the link for details.

Share

Disparate Treatment 0

Frame One, captioned

Click for the original image.

Share

Different Strokes at Different Folks 0

Eric Foster tells a tale or people, pigment, and perception.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Once again, politeness becomes child’s play.

Too many guns and too much stupid is a lethal mixture.

Share

Can You Spot the Difference? 0

Frame One:  White guy in car in traffic stop talking on his cell phone says,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share