Geek Stuff category archive
A Questionable Identity 0
Security maven Bruce Schneier tells the story arrested and detained because a Flock camera misread his license plate.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Gullible? El Reg reports that
Details at the link.
The Crypto Con 0
But is it truly a con? At Above the Law, tax attorney Steven Chung applies the eye of a lawyer to Donald Trump’s crypto capers.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Threatening to accelerate the concentration of wealth in this new gilded age? Security maven Bruce Schneier argues that (emphasis added), (a)s for AI itself, the concentration of power and wealth in these tech companies is the greatest existential risk facing society today.
Follow the link to see why.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Slopping all over the internet? El Reg reports that
Much more at the link.
And, remember, “social” media isn’t.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
A ghostwriter? At the Psychology Today website, Jim Taylor argues that “(p)eople shouldn’t take ownership of content they did not write.”
The (Google) Surveillance State 0
The EFF explains how, for Google, the days of “Don’t Be Evil” are very much a thing of the past.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Willing to betray secrets? Just be sure to ask it nicely.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
A learning aid? At the Psychology Today website, Timothy Cook (no, not that Tim Cook) reports that “AI use can raise scores in the short term but worsen kids’ thinking abilities in the long term, studies find.”
Follow the link for mere.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Capable of critical thought? Zeynep Tufekci argues that (emphasis added)
Large language models are not reasoning machines. They’re plausibility engines. They can only assess which answers are probable, based on the data on which the models have been trained.
Follow the link for his arguements.
And, in more news of AI . . . .
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
The Dot-Com Bubble v 2.0? El Reg reports that
“These actions do not signal reduced confidence in AI. Rather, they suggest a growing willingness to evaluate where AI creates meaningful value and where it does not. Organizations appear increasingly focused on concentrating investment where expected returns are strongest,” the report said.
Much more at the link.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Capable of kidnapping your data? El Reg reports that (s)mooth AI criminal drives ‘first’ end-to-end agentic ransomware attack. (To put that another way, once it got the prompt, an AI bot ran a rensomeware scam from start to finish all on its ownsome.)
AI doesn’t stand for “ariticial intelligence.” It stands “amoral instrumentation.”
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Impartial? Only as impartial as the data they scrape train on.
At the Psychology Today website, Phil Reed reminds that “AI mirrors human cognitive biases, not just factual knowledge.” Follow the link for the evidence.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
A competent couples counselor? Better have that divorce lawyeer’s number handy.
Driven to Destruction 0
A tale of AI, that is, autoficial intelligence.
It’s All about the Algorithm 0
Time of having “social” media decide what to hear about?
The EFF travels back into the past to recommend a way to escape tentacles of “social” media algorithms.
Facebook Frolics 0
Politico reports:
One more time, “social” media isn’t.
The Coming Robot Apocalypse 0
My old Philly DL Friend Noz tells a tale of the singularity.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much? 0
A teaching tool? If you want more fools.
At the Psychology Today website, Soren Kaplan discusses a study involving 26,000 students indicating that “(u)sing AI can create short-term results but may stifle long-term learning.”







