From Pine View Farm

Hate Sells category archive

In a Quandary? 0

Michael Hiltzik offers a way out:

Here’s a handy two-step process for taking a thoughtful and judicious approach to the burning social and political issues of our time:

1. Examine closely the position taken by Elon Musk, and;

2. Go the other way.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Farron discusses Donald Trump’s attempts to pretend that he didn’t know anything about the “Heritage” Foundation’s Project 2025.

Share

The Cult of Poisonality 0

Michael in Norfolk has a few questions about the Trump and his cultists.

Likewise, how some Republican “friends” and acquaintances can support the man leaves me dumbfounded. Are they really that racist that they would burn down democracy simple (sic) to maintain perceived privilege and superiority? Are low taxes enough to justify hatred, lies violence and misogyny? Is the desire to inflict archaic, hate driven religious belief reason to destroy the nation as we know it and replace it with a fascist regime?

Follow the link for context.

Share

The “Wallace Conundrum” 0

At AL.com, Kyle Whitmire tries to figure out the core beliefs of major figures in today’s Republican Party and concludes that there’s no there there. Methinks he may be onto something.

A snippet:

There are people we all know . . . who care less about the right answer and more for the right answer right now. They will change their beliefs, their clothes, their haircuts — whatever it takes — to suit the situation, to please whoever’s approval they crave.

They’re the political Shape Shifters.

Such changes shouldn’t be confused with changing one’s mind. Healthy minds evolve to incorporate new information, evidence or experience. In contrast, Shape Shifters change to fit new attitudes or new audiences — for approval.

Follow the link to find out why he dubs this the “Wallace conundrum.”

Share

The Disinformation Superhighway 0

Using the shooting at Donald Trump as a starting point, the Seattle Times’s Melissa Davis looks at the speed with which dis- and misinformation spreads over “social” media. A snippet:

Where things start to get a little crooked is when the evidence starts shifting, either agreeing or disagreeing with people’s purpose or interest, rather than the other way around. That’s how we get from the “shooting was staged because Trump didn’t duck” to “the Secret Service didn’t care because one of them is smiling” (this paired with a digitally manipulated news photo) to “the shooter was antifa” (he was a registered Republican). An Italian sports journalist was unpleasantly surprised shortly after the shooting to see his name and photo circulating online, ID’ing him as the shooter. How did that even get started? Who knows?

And the rumors don’t slow down.

I commend the entire article to your attention. And, remember, “social” media isn’t.

Share

Stray Thought 0

“Yes, but will it hold up in court?” is no longer a valid rhetorical question.

We have seen that, with the application of enough juice for a long enough time to the correct vulnerable points, anything, regardless of legality or morality, will hold up in court.

Share

Freedom of Screech in This New Gilded Age 0

Self-proclaimed “free speech absolutist” Elon Musk threatens to take advertisers to court so as to force them to place their advertising speech on Twitter X, because he is absolutely in favor of freedom of speech, or something.

Yeah, I know, it sounds absolutely insane. Follow the link and decide for yourself.

Read more »

Share

Patriot Gamers 0

Frame One, captioned

Click to view the original image.

Share

“When People Show You Who They Are, Believe Them the First Time”* 0

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Gene Collier takes a close look at the implications of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. He finds it–er–less than attractive.

Indeed, he characterizes it as a “MAGA Manifesto.”

Follow the first link for 900 pages of secessionist propaganda said project.

Follow the second to learn why Collier sees it as a “MAGA Manifesto.”

Aside:

I not exactly sure what heritage the “Heritage” Foundation is celebrating, but it sounds not unlike the legacy of one of my late relatives.
_____________

*Maya Angelou.

Share

A Notion of Immigrants 0

Robert Reich points out that immigrants have long been “America’s secret sauce for economic growth and prosperity,” while they long have also been targets for those who sow hate.

Or you can read the transcript.

Share

Republican Thought Police, Reprise 0

At the Charlotte Observer, Kate Murphy, pastor at The Grove Presbyterian Church in Charlotte, pushes back at the current wave of they-call-themselves Christians and their push for establishmentarianism. A snippet:

I am a pastor and a practicing Christian, but all this blasphemous foolishness has me declaring this Festivus in July because, in the words of the fictional Frank Costanza on Seinfeld, “I got a lot of problems with you people.”

If the governor of Florida can, by the power not vested in him, unilaterally declare that the church of Satan isn’t a religion, then he can also wake up one morning and decide that Islam isn’t a religion, or Hinduism, or Catholicism or any faith that allows women to preach or doesn’t handle snakes.

The point of the separation of church and state, as any fourth grader with a reasonably competent history teacher can tell you, isn’t to limit a citizen’s ability to practice their faith, but to protect it.

(Broken link fixed.)

____________________

*Methinks in this context, “Christian” is New Speak for “Secesh.”

Share

American Taliban 0

Rebecca Watson discusses the establishmentarians’ efforts to (en)force their creed on the polity.

Or you can read the transcript.

Share

Establishmentarians 0

The Arizona Republic’s Laurie Roberts has a question:

Is there anything more un-American than forcing your beliefs on a country that was founded on the concepts of religious freedom and democratic ideals?

In related news, Leonard Hitchcock, writing in the Idaho State Journal, notes that:

Isn’t it apparent, when we look at the history of Protestant Christianity, that Bible interpretation is rarely indisputable; and that a) those who do the interpreting usually end up finding what they wanted to find, and b) that what they wanted to find was a divine judgment that agreed with their own beliefs, and c) that those beliefs were formed from a variety of psycho-socio-political influences, not just meditation upon the Biblical text?

Follow the links for context.

Share

“History Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes”* 0

Today, it is Lynne Roy, writing at the Portland Press-Herald, who hears a rhyme.

_____________

*Mark Twain.

Share

Our Trumpled Polity 0

Thom runs the numbers that show that, since Donald Trump entered the political scene in 2015, hate crimes have escalated dramatically.

Thom also notes that “hate is a cheap effective political weapon” and warns not to be taken in by it.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

Writing at the Kansas City Star, Joe Kohlburn offers an explanation for recent mobilization of the Republican Thought Police SWAT teams across the country:

Book challenges are never about protecting children. They are about protecting parents from the reality that the world around them is changing.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

Transmogrification 0

At the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Keith Burris discusses the path from populism to nationalism to fascism. Though I’m not sure I agree with everything he says, I think it a timely read. Here’s a bit (emphasis added):

The darker side is reaction against a world that seems to be changing too fast. A world in which an African American man can be president and a woman of color can be vice president. A world in which there is gay marriage and there are trans teenagers.

Reaction is the ignition and the fuel. Not conservatism, not preservation, but reaction.

And reaction often leads to wrecking balls.

That is when nationalist populism turns into something properly called fascism.

Methinks a lot of the antics of the right-wing evangelical they-call-themselves Christians fits right in with Burris’s thoughts on reaction.

Share

Political Climate 0

Thom and a caller discuss why fascism seems to be on the rise in Europe and the U. S. and how the effects of climate change may be fueling fascist impulses.

It’s short piece and well worth a listen.

Share

The New Golden Rule 0

According to right-wing evangelical they-call-themselves Christians. it’s “do unto others.”

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Heather Lynch explores how dis coarse discourse got so coarse.

Share