From Pine View Farm

Mammon category archive

Influencer Idiocy 0

Emily Balcetis, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, has some issues with how “influencers” promote products. She believes that

Stricter rules are needed to limit harmful social media marketing.

Follow the link for her reasoning and, remember, “social” media isn’t.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

At the Idaho State Journal, Kim Shinkoskey argues that

MAGA Republicans and their billionaire backers like Elon Musk have finally honed-in on a ten-point formula that works for obtaining political and economic power.

Follow the link and get the points.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Seth discusses Bernie Sanders’s claims that we are will down a path to oligarchy.

Spoiler: Seth thinks Bernie may have a point.

Share

Signs of the Fall 0

I seldom look at the sport section of my local rag (except to read Bob Molinaro’s column, because he is a fine writer with a sharp pen and a wicked sense of humor). Even when I paid much more attention to sports than I do now, I was more interesting in watching competitions than in reading about them.

Nevertheless, as I leafed through the sports section on the way to the agony columns in yesterday’s paper (yes, paper, not electrons), something caught my eye.

My local rag now carries a syndicated column methinks no doubt subtly designed to suck people into covering sports betting.

We are a broken society.

Share

Monetizing Misinformation 0

The SPLC follows the money behind some fonts of falsehoods.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Title:  The 1% Solution on Hold.  Billionaire One:  We make 400 times more than our employees and are taxed lower than them.  Billionaire Two:  Yeah.  So? Billionaire One:  So we could double their wages and triple our tax reate.  That'll benefit our employees and we'll still be filthy rich.  Billionaire Two:  Sure, but not outrageously filthy rich.  (Pause)  Billionaire One:  Sorry.  Ethical brain fart.  Billionaire Two:  I'm starting to wonder about your Billionaire status, Carl.

Click to view the original image.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

At the Portland Press-Herald, Todd R. Nelson argues that Walt Whitman’s words from a century and a half ago ring true today in this new Gilded Age.

Here’s a bit of his article:

He bemoaned corruption. “I have noticed,” he wrote, “how the millions of sturdy farmers and mechanics are … the helpless supple-jacks of comparatively few politicians. And I have noticed more and more, the alarming spectacle of parties usurping the government, and openly and shamelessly wielding it for party purposes.” Ahem.

It gets worse. “The depravity of the business classes of our country is not less than has been supposed, but infinitely greater,” Whitman writes. “The official services of America, national, state, and municipal, in all their branches and departments, except the judiciary, are saturated in corruption, bribery, falsehood, maladministration.”

Aside:

In these days of our Supreme Supremacist Court, he might rethink that bit about the judiciary.

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Image:  Lady Liberty sprawled on her back pieced by a

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Thom posits that today’s robber barons have learned from yesterday’s. That’s why they are buying up media outlets, so as to manipulate dis coarse discourse.

Share

This Trumpled Kleptocracy 0

Sam and the crew discuss how the robber barons of this new gilded age are poisoning dis coarse discourse.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Speaking of money in politics . . . .

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

From the Youtube page:

Whose Land is this anyway? Does to belong to the mega-corporations, and we’re just here to be their workforce? Does it belong to Trump and the willing victims of his lies? Let’s take a look at where we stand on that issue.

Share

“We’re Trying To Have a Society Here” 0

At the Portland Press-Herald, Victoria Hugo-Nadal uses examples from her own life to remind us that, despite what Republicans would have you think, there is, indeed, such a thing as “the common good.”

Share

Twits on Twitter X Offenders 0

Bitcoin bogosity.

Share

Twits Own Twitter X Offenders 0

You’ve heard of packing the court?

Now comes Elon Musk, picking the court.

Share

This New Gilded Age, It’s Bubblelicious 0

Sam and Emma talk with Rob Larson, professor of economics at Tacoma Community College, about how today’s generation of Robber Barons are perverting the polity.

Share

The Privatization Scam 0

And it is a scam.

The Arizona Republic’s Laurie Roberts runs the numbers and shows that you can voucher on that.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Responsible for its actions? You must be joking.

Here’s a bit from the report by El Reg (emphasis added):

Microsoft’s LinkedIn will update its User Agreement next month with a warning that it may show users generative AI content that’s inaccurate or misleading.

LinkedIn thus takes after its parent, which recently revised its Service Agreement to make clear that its Assistive AI should not be relied upon.

LinkedIn, however, has taken its denial of responsibility a step further: it will hold users responsible for sharing any policy-violating misinformation created by its own AI tools.

H/T Le Show for its coverage of AI (and many other items that don’t get the attention that they deserve).

Share

The Weather Bomb 0

Caption:  The Weather Control Machine.  Image:  Huge tanker truck labeled

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.