From Pine View Farm

Republican Hypocrisy category archive

The Rule of Lawless 0

At Above the Law, Liz Dye and Andrew Torrez tell a tale of strange bedfellow united to fight the rule of lawless.

Share

Suffer the Children 0

As has been well demonstrated, that’s a Republican family value.

Via the Las Vegas Sun, Layla Sayed looks at the effects of the Trump maladministration’s actions on SNAP benefits. Here’s a tiny bit from her article (emphasis added):

Since the bill’s passage, SNAP participation has dropped by 10% across the country. In some states, the effects are amplified. In Arizona, for example, SNAP participation fell by 53%. And in the coming months, those figures are likely to rise.

These statistics are not just numbers — they’re people not being fed.

Before the new law, SNAP helped feed 41.7 million low-income Americans per month, 62% of whom were families with children.

Share

Red Scare Redux 0

PoliticalProf dissects how the Trump maladministration defines “communism.”

Share

Misdirection Play 0

Donald Trump sits on bag of money labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

Parsing the Playbook 0

From the Youtube page:

Thom talks with Democratic Senator of Oregon, Jeff Merkley, about his FREE article, Ring the Alarm Bells: The Ten Rules of Trump’s Authoritarian Playbook, and his experience at the U.S. Senate chamber outlining these corrupt and destructive tactics.

You can download Senator Merkley’s Ring the Alarm Bells.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Know them by the company they keep.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

When you cut through the Trumpian gobbledygook quoted in this report, it becomes clear that the Trump maladministration wants the Smithsonian Institution to promote partisan propaganda, rather than nurture knowledge.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Methinks that, when you read this article from the Des Moines Register about the struggles faced by Iowa residents since the Trump maladministration slasched SNAP benefits, you will understand why I hold that mean for the sake of mean is a Republican family value.

Share

Stray Question 0

When an executive unilaterally imposes taxes without consent of the legislature, is that not a text-book case of taxation without representation?

Share

Unbalanced and Unchecked 0

At the Des Moines Register, veteran attorney and long-time civil servant Dean Lerner argues that America’s system of checks and balances is broken and offers a theory as to who broke it.

Methinks he makes a strong argument. Read it and see what you think.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

A Trumpled IRS official.

Share

Emoluments 0

David follows the money.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

In the midst of a longer piece regarding a U. S. District Attorney who was lawfully appointed, but whom the Trump maladministration fired 56 minutes after he was sworn in, Above the Law’s Joe Patrice reveals what may be behind said firing:

Trump wants to install prosecutors illegally and indefinitely without Senate approval.

Follow the link for context.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

The Trump maladministration seems to believe that, if we don’t talk about America’s originial sin of chattel slavery, then, by jimiminy, it really couldn’t have been all that bad.

Afterthought:

It’s all about whitewashing–you will pardon the expression–the racism.

They claim that they don’t wan’t to discuss things that make America look bad.

What they mean is that they don’t want to discuss things that make white American racists look bad.

Share

Hoist on His Own Petard, Rule of Lawless Dept. 0

Above the Law reports on a federal judge’s ruling that Donald Trump can’t have his cake and eat it too. A snippet:

. . . he’s (Trump’s–ed.) found himself scrambling for an aide to explain what a “petard” is after a federal judge in Miami hoisted him by it.

Follow the link for context.

Share

Boss Trump 0

Crow labeled

Via Job’s Anger, where I also cribbed the title for this post.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

In The Seattle Times, federal judges from the Western District of Washington state warn us the rule of law is in danger. They begin with a bit of history:

One of the Declaration’s grievances was that the King of England had taken control of the levers of justice: He not only wielded the power to appoint all judges but, as stated in another grievance, he also “made Judges dependent on his Will alone[.]” At the time, judges relied entirely on the King’s grace for their jobs and their compensation. Any judge who ruled against royal interests risked losing his livelihood (the first female judge would not be appointed until over a century later). The result? Capitulation and obedience.

Read the whole article to learn why they believe this to be relevant to today.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

The Trump maladministration seems intent on exercising the freedom of repress.

Share

Originalist Sin 0

Harvard law professor Noah Feldman argues that, even as they pretend to be “originalists,” the current majority on the Supreme Supremacist Court abandons “originalism” whenever it suits their purpose.

I commend his article to your attention.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

GOP Elephant, holding newspaper with headline about Graham Platner:  How could you Dems be so dumb as to choose a rapist to run for the Senate?  Man:  Easy, no one knew about the alleged rape.  But you always knew that Trump was a rapist.  GOP Elephant:  But . . . .  Man:  But what?  GOP Elephant, looking at newspaper:  Oh, look!  Garfield's got rabies.  Man (breaking the fourth wall):  Susan Collins supports a rapist.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.