“Get Me Rewrite!” 0
At the Des Moines Register, Lyle Miller digs into Republicans’ efforts to portray Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 election as a good thing.
I commend his article to your attention.
The Firestorm of Lies 0
Thom dissects the firestorm of right-wing lies about the California fires.
The Burial Plot 0
If we bury it somewhere away from the front page, maybe nobody will notice it.
What’s in a Name? 0
In the midst of a longer column regarding Donald Trump’s threat promise to rename the Gulf of Mexico, the Tampa Bay Times’s Stephanie Hayes clarifies the actual reason behind his desire to do so.
The whole piece is an absolute hoot and I don’t want to spoil your fun.
Just go read it for yourself.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Those “responsible gun owners” just cannot seem to resist the urge to expose their portable phalluses to others on our nation’s highways and on its byways.
Facebook Frolics 0
Sam and the crew dissect the dissimulations of the digital despot.
The EFF also has–er–qualms after a second reading of the Zuckerborg’s new policy. A bit from their post:
One more time, “social” media isn’t.
Making Sense of the Nonsensical 0
At the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, David Mills considers Donald Trump’s recent statements about–er–annexing Greenland, Canada and Panama–something that in saner times would be considered shall-we-say somewhat aggressive and warlike.
Mills offers a theory as to why Donald Trump says some of the things he does. Here’s a bit of his article:
Many of us have had bosses like that. I think Donald Trump is that kind of boss. He creates confusion and then fear by being so cavalier with the truth.
He may be onto something.
My own theory is simpler.
I don’t think Trump and truth or on speaking terms, but that’s just me.
Break Time 0
Off to drink liberally.
Still Rising Again after All These Years 0
At Psychology Today Blogs, Monnica T Williams explores the harm done by racist (and, by extension, other bigoted) microaggressions. She points that their being “micro” doesn’t make them any less “aggressions.” A snippet:
The Crypto Cons 0
Yes, it appears that there’s more than one.
Via Balloon Juice, Bluesky user “jon of the north” talks taxonomy and offers a classification of the cons.
