A Tale of Two Towns: One Going Up, One Going Down 5
Going down: Picher, Oklahoma, where the guvmint is buying out all the residents.
(No word on what happened to the mining companies who built and simultaneously destroyed Picher–they may be long gone).
Going up: Houses along the Neshaminy Creek (Check out the slideshow), where the guvmint is paying to raise houses onto stilts because of flooding:
I’m not sure how I feel about this latter story. On one hand, the flooding didn’t used to be so bad, not until the better part of Bucks County got paved over, exacerbating the flooding. On the other hand, why should we, the taxpayers, pay for persons to stay in harms way? I sort of would rather see my taxes go to educate some child out of poverty.
Yes, the same reasoning could extend to New Orleans. The incompetence of the Corps of Engineers is a separate issue from the wisdom of living eight feet below sea level next to a major river.
February 4, 2007 at 3:45 pm
I think I’m going to fall over in a dead faint. Frank, we may ALMOST agree on something here! The wisdom of rebuilding a city where the same thing will happen again.
Thoughts on the west coast?
February 5, 2007 at 5:56 pm
If it slides off into the ocean we won’t have to rebuild it.
February 5, 2007 at 6:26 pm
Kind of like California, Opie?
February 5, 2007 at 7:46 pm
Nevada would be water front land!
February 6, 2007 at 7:45 pm
Little problem there. It’s called the Sierra Nevada.