From Pine View Farm

February, 2008 archive

I Get Mail 0

(Warning: I violate one of my rules in this post: The rule of not using more than one rhetorical question in a row.)

I got another one of those stupid RNC “surveys” today.

I’ve mentioned them before. I’ve already answered the questions, sealed it up in the business-reply envelope, and will be sending it off tomorrow. (At least they will have to pay the incoming postage; according to the USPS, it will cost them $1.11 to receive the letter. That’s $1.11 they will not be apply to apply to further subverting the Constitution of the United States of America.)

The questions in the “survey” were in the usual style:

Do you favor the forces of truth, justice, and the American way, or do you favor evil librul Democrats?

Yes

No

No opinion

One of the questions, though, caught my eye.

It was something like

Do you favor Republican plans for a balanced budget as opposed to [blah blah blah]?

I could ask myself only, “What the hell planet are these people living on?”

How the heck can they seriously put a question like that on this “survey”? Have they no consciousness of what they have done to the Federal budget during their failed stewardship of the engine of governance?

Or do they seriously believe that their adherents are only listening to what they say, while ignoring what they do?

Or do they figure that their adherents are just too stupid for words?

Also posted on Kos.

Share

Liars, Damned Liars, and NeoCons 0

Diversity, Inc., outs who’s behind the smears of Senator Obama. It’s the SOB: same old bunch:

Why won’t these rumors die? Those who perpetuate them don’t tell you the whole story. Are the individuals behind this “true patriots”? No doubt most of them wear flag lapel pins. And most of them probably put their hands over their hearts during the National Anthem.

(snip)

A group called Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, who waged war on the 2004 presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., by attacking his Vietnam War record despite the medals he received, is behind many of the Internet rumors now circulating about Obama’s patriotism.

The Republican-funded group, now called “Swift Vets and POWS for Truth,” was founded shortly after Kerry secured the Democratic nomination in 2004; it published a book and a series of television advertisements denigrating his war record, reports SourceWatch. The smear campaign was financed mostly by Sam Fox, a billionaire conservative who was denied a post as U.S. ambassador to Belgium when this information came out during a Senate confirmation hearing. President Bush, however, appointed Fox to the position anyway while the Senate was in recess. Read more about the money and agenda behind this propaganda machine on MediaTransparency.com.

Meanwhile, John Cole documents the atrocious, as they hide behind their American flag lapel pins.

Bill Maher goes over the rules for flag lapel pins here (the relevant portion starts about six minutes in). Warning: language:

Share

Drinking Liberally 0

Tomorrow, Tangier Restaurant, 18th and Lombard, Philadelphia, Pa., 6 to 9 p. m.

If the dentist doesn’t beat me up too bad, I’ll be there.

Share

A Message for Ralph Nader 2

This is not hilarious:

Ralph Nader said today he will run for president as a third-party candidate, criticizing the top White House contenders as too close to big business and pledging to repeat a bid that will “shift the power from the few to the many.”

Anyone who believed his claim in 2000 that there was no difference between the Democratic and Republican Parties wasn’t paying attention then. And he helped facilitate the long national nightmare which, one hopes, will come to an end 11 months.

This, on the other hand, is hilarious:

Video via Phillybits.

Share

The Wingnut Faculty for Lying 0

And I do mean “faculty.”

Phillybits has the scoop.

Share

iProd 1

Oh, my.

Advanced gadgeteers evidently cannot rest until all technology combines into a single useful tool – the Swiss Army Knifing of the digital world.

And now, along with phones that make movies and Blackberries that navigate better than Columbus, come weapons that sing.

More specifically, Tasers are being paired with MP3 players – and marketed to women as fashionable safety devices.

Scheduled to hit the market in early March, the Taser MPH is the bizarre coupling of a gunlike device capable of delivering a 50,000-volt jolt, and its holster, which contains a 1-gigabyte-capacity handheld music player.

Share

Bushonomics 2

Mushrooming problems:

Chester County’s powerful mushroom industry, long immune to the ravages of Mother Nature, is succumbing instead to another potent force these days: the high cost of energy.

The cost of compost, heating oil and other essentials needed to grow mushrooms has risen so quickly since Hurricane Katrina caused a spike in crude-oil prices two years ago that some growers in the area – where more than half the nation’s mushrooms are produced – say they are operating in the red.

So, many Chester County mushroom growers this winter have begun to impose steep price increases, a move they say is essential but makes them more vulnerable to competition that now includes cheap mushrooms grown in China.

Share

If You’re Sick, You Ain’t Profitable 3

Providing health care and the profit motive, incompatible. We need to move to a system with a goal of providing health care, not a goal of enriching CEO’s and salespersons (emphasis added):

One of California’s largest for-profit insurers stopped a controversial practice of canceling sick policyholders Friday after a judge ordered Health Net Inc. to pay more than $9 million to a breast cancer patient it dropped in the middle of chemotherapy.

(snip)

State Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner applauded the judge, saying “health insurers simply cannot hold out the promise of insurance for their consumers and then snatch it away just when people need it most. That is illegal, immoral and will not be tolerated.”

Earlier, Health Net had defended its actions, saying it never would have issued Bates a policy in the first place if she had disclosed her true weight and a preexisting heart condition on her application.

Bates said a broker filled out the application while she was styling a client’s hair on a busy day in her shop. She said she answered his questions as best she could.

Bates said she already had insurance and wasn’t in the market until the broker came by and told her that he thought he could get her a lower monthly premium if she switched to Health Net.

At the arbitration hearing, internal company documents were disclosed showing that Health Net had paid employee bonuses for meeting a cancellation quota and for the amount of money saved.

“It’s difficult to imagine a policy more reprehensible than tying bonuses to encourage the rescission of health insurance that keeps the public well and alive,” the judge wrote.

Via Atrios.

Share

Protect Telecoms Act 0

It is indeed totally strange that, somehow, the security of the United States of America depends on protecting corporations who broke the law from liability for their acts.

Corporations that obeyed the existing FISA law in implementing wiretapping and eavesdropping were already protected from liability, because, holy moly, they were obeying a law.

The issue here is protecting those who broke the law.

But, given that the Current Federal Administrator contemns the rule of law, we should not be surprised that he chooses to protect the lawless.

Share

Hello, World 2

It’s been a long week of racking up billable hours and trying to be a webmaster. As you can see, we are mostly back.

I’ll be working on the sidebar throughout the day. For the geeky among us, the blogroll is organized by categories. In updating the database from WordPress 1.5.x format to WordPress 2.3 format, the categories disappeared.

All comments are being held for moderation until until I get a WordPress 2.3 compatible anti-comment-spam plugin working. (Honestly, I got this thing back on line yesterday about 4:00 p. m.; within 15 minutes, I had seven spam comments.)

Share

The Wheels Are Coming Off 0

One of the most telltale signs of what is happening to our economy is the University of Michigan consumer confidence survey.

It has been trending down for the past two years and has already dropped to levels that were last reached during the 90-91 recession, when unemployment was at 7%. This shows me that increases in health care, energy and food costs are taking there toll.

It is not the fact that people are unemployed that’s the problem; it’s that they have less discretionary income to spend. Less spending will result in higher unemployment in the future, making the situation worse. Where are government’s focus should be is ending runaway inflation in health care energy and food. Addressing the fact that ethanol is causing food prices to soar, health care causes us to totally lose a consumer’s whole family to even a minor illness.

A one time tax rebate is to simplistic a cure to what are fundamental problems that will last for years.

Share

Bushonomics 0

Vacancies.

Via Atrios.

Share

Fear Mongering (Updated) 0

Today, the House of Representatives finally mustered up the guts to stand up to the Current Federal Administrator.

And, in true George W. Bush form, the Current Federal Administrator threw a hissy fit because he didn’t get his way.

And what happens to national security if the Protect America (Yeah. Right.) Act does not get extended?

Absolutely nothing. Follow the link to hear the full analysis:

In August, Congress passed the Protect America Act, which granted the Bush administration legal authority to spy on Americans’ communications overseas without individual warrants. That law expires Saturday, and Congress is deadlocked on a new bill to replace it.

President Bush says to delay is dangerous, but many intelligence experts, including Suzanne Spaulding, say very little will actually change Saturday, even if the bill is allowed to expire.

Spaulding, who spent 20 years working on national security issues for the government and is now a private attorney in Washington, D.C., talks with Michelle Norris.

Of course, some of the telecommunications companies might have to pay for violating the trust of their customers.

Gasp!

We can’t have that.

Violating trust is the Bushie way.

Addendum, 2/15/2008:

Dan Froomkin documents the hypocrisy.

John Cole asks, “Why are they lying?

Share

Obama Blows It 1

Apparently, he’s taking lessons from the Clinton campaign. From Fact Check dot org.

In television ads, Clinton’s campaign says her health care plan is the only one that will provide universal coverage, while Obama says his plan will cover all Americans, too. We find:

  • Obama is being misleading when he says his proposal would “cover everyone.” It would make coverage available to all, but experts we consulted estimate that 15 million to 26 million wouldn’t take it up unless required to do so.
  • Clinton stretches things a bit, too. Even her plan – which, unlike Obama’s, includes a mandate for individuals to get insurance – would leave out a million people or perhaps more, depending on how severe the penalties would be for those who don’t comply. She won’t say how her mandate would be enforced, but has said that she was open to the possibility of garnishing wages.
  • Update, Feb. 15: A new Obama ad in Wisconsin misrepresents the words of former Labor Secretary Robert Reich, falsely claiming he said the Obama plan produced greater savings than the Clinton plan.
  • Experts also are skeptical of both candidates’ claims that their plans will reduce the cost of insurance for the typical family by $2,000 or more. ” I know zero credible evidence to support that conclusion,” says M.I.T’s Jonathan Gruber.

Behind the dueling ads there is a legitimate disagreement. Obama is reluctant to force people to buy health insurance they don’t want even if the government makes it available at a subsidized price. And Clinton says that any proposal that doesn’t aim to cover 100 percent of the uninsured would be “nibbled to death” by opponents.

No, I’m not changing my sidebar.

Share

Unintended Side Effects 0

Why do I think of Con Air when I see Con-Way?

And what did the Conair people think of that movie, anyway?

Share

Bushonomics 0

It’s dangerous work.

As cash-strapped Americans fight to keep their homes, an increasing number are losing their cars.

The nation’s busting economy has been a boom for the repo man.

Nationwide, auto repossessions are at a 10-year high, according to an economist at one of the nation’s biggest wholesale auto auction houses.

Share

Contempt for the Contemptible 1

I can’t vote for this guy. I don’t live in Florida.

I’ve spent lots of time in Florida. Frankly, I wouldn’t do anything that wasn’t frankly. Also, I wouldn’t live in Florida on a bet.

But, if I could vote for this guy, I would.

Share

Bags of Air (Updated) 0

I mentioned them the other day.

Eliot Spitzer:

Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to consumers’ ability to repay, making loans with deceptive “teaser” rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets.

Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the banks that were victimizing consumers.

The Republican Party. Making the rich richer and the poor poorer for 150 years.

Addendum, Not So Soon After:

Balloon Juice.

Share

Perfidy 0

I could not have asked the questions better myself. Dan Froomkin (emphasis added):

Who are we as a nation? Are we who we used to be? Did one terrorist attack really change all that? Can it be changed back?

Those, at heart, are the questions raised by the Senate’s passage yesterday of a bill that would ban harsh interrogation tactics used by the CIA — a bill already passed by the House, and a bill President Bush has vowed to veto.

The debate is not just about waterboarding. It’s about whether other tactics — such as prolonged exposure to freezing temperatures, forced nudity, sexual humiliation, mock executions, the use of attack dogs, the withholding of food, water and medical care and the application of electric shocks — should be part of our official interrogation toolkit.

Whether you call them torture or not, they are undeniably cruel. They are undeniable assaults on human dignity.

They are all prohibited by the Army Field Manual, which covers all military interrogations. They are all off limits to the FBI. Now Congress wants the CIA to adhere to the same restrictions.

But Bush says no.

The propagation of our values has long been a hallmark of American foreign policy. Chief among those values has been respect for human dignity. But the message we’ve been sending lately is altogether different. How can we tell other countries to respect human dignity when we have made it optional for our own government? When our official policy is that the ends justify the means?

Violating American values is not a defense of America. It is a rape of America.

Share

Demographics 0

What the future holds, from Radio Times:

The rising political clout of Hispanic voters. First we’ll hear about a new population projection from the Pew Hispanic Center. In 2005 Hispanics accounted for 14 percent of the U.S. population, that’s expected to increase to 29 percent by 2050. We’ll talk with JEFFREY PASSEL co-author of the new report, then we’ll look at the role Hispanic voters are playing in this year’s Presidential election. Our two guests are LUIS CLEMENS editor of Candidato USA, an internet publication that helps clients reach Hispanic voters and MARISA ABRAJANO co-author of a forthcoming research article The Hispanic Voter in the 2004 Presidential Election.

Listen here or go to the website and search for the February 13, 2008, show.

Read the Pew Hispanic Center’s report here.

Share