Virginia Beach
Second Thursday of the Month
Drinking Liberally Website
Join us at Meetup.
Follow the conversation at Facebook.
In the latest migration to a new virtual private server, some of the links to images in the earliest posts to this blog were broken. If you encounter one of these broken links, please let me know. I have backups and can restore the images.
There’s only one person who agrees with me on everything, and, as I’m not running for office, that person is not on the ballot.
I want think that this explains my problems.
But, naaaaaah.
March 4, 2009 at 10:14 am
Boy, is that a “blame-the-victim” article.
I’ve found that I intimidate most of the men I encounter. They can’t keep up with me in a conversation, and they can’t beat me at Scrabble. They usually react by calling me a jerk — if they call back at all.
March 4, 2009 at 10:51 am
To tell the truth, I wasn’t able to finish the article. The tendency of psychology to try to turn everything into a syndrone–or worse–is both laughable and harmful.
Besides, most men are pigs.
I am. I’m just too shy to let it show.
March 4, 2009 at 12:33 pm
Since when?
Men are intimidated by intelligence in a woman. It takes a very confident male to be a husband/partner to one, if he isn’t smarter than she is. Either confidence, or loads of sneaky to charm her somehow.
March 4, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Oh, I didn’t like the article either.
March 4, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Frankly, I convinced that the primary reason I have always shy around women, at least as regards the romantic boxing ring, has nothing to do IQ.
It has to do with growing up isolated on a farm and having a high school dating life that ranged from lousy to almost non-existent.
That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
I think that, by the time people reach college age, their self-confidence or lack thereof in the romantic boxing ring is pretty much formed.
March 4, 2009 at 5:34 pm
The last paragraph I’d agree with, to an extent. Frank, you know Chris’ education level, vs mine. He’s smarter in common sense areas than I am, by miles. I’ve got it where the books are concerned. By the time he had reached ‘college age’ he had roamed the country, on his own. His personality had a lot to do with that. Personality that I saw duplicated the first time I met his mother.
When I met him, the sneaky sucker used personality on me. (Still does, as a matter of fact.) He’s as extroverted as I am introverted. I don’t “mix” with people I don’t know. He’s never met a stranger. He can walk up to a group of people & find common ground.
So in some ways, yeah being with people can help a person be more outgoing, but I really believe most of it is genetics.
March 4, 2009 at 6:09 pm
I don’t know about the genetics part. I’m not taking issue, I just don’t know. But I think a lot of those aspects of someone’s personality start to form very young. You can see them in five-year olds at a swimming pool