From Pine View Farm

Rhetorical Question 0

On the Media devoted two segments to political rhetoric in last week’s show. You can find both of them at the show’s website.

The one I found particularly interesting was this one:

There’s been no evidence to link today’s toxic political environment with Jared Loughner’s decision to use his gun last weekend. But the question persists: what has the aggressive rhetoric — peddled by mainstream candidates and media outlets and not just militant fringe groups — done to our society? The New Yorker’s George Packer says the particular motivations for Loughner’s rampage aren’t the point.

A nugget from the transcript (emphasis added):

GEORGE PACKER: The key part of this is where it’s coming from. It’s coming from leaders in the right wing political movement and their media heroes.

Let me just say one thing about Sarah Palin and the crosshairs campaign literature. By itself I wouldn’t think that that’s a particularly incendiary document. It’s first the context in which it appears, which is continual use of that kind of language of guns, of war.

And second, in retrospect, it just seems indecent. This woman was shot. Isn’t it regrettable someone once put a crosshairs on her district?

Now, these are people who, as Orwell once wrote, are playing with fire without knowing that it’s hot. They don’t seem to understand the toxicity of what they’ve created.

Follow the link above to listen or listen here (mp3):

Share

Comments are closed.

From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.