From Pine View Farm

2011 archive

The Golden Fleecing 0

Excerpt from the transcript:

Exactly. I think in the end, the most crucial decision that Bush made right after 9/11 — and he said it explicitly by the end of September of that year — was we don`t want the American people to sacrifice. You know, maybe longer lines at airport check-in, but that was that. Go to Disney Land, go shopping. And there would be no taxes to pay for what would turn out to be two wars.

I think that injected a cancer into the American political culture just as you were saying. If we don`t pay for wars, why do we have to pay for anything? And I think you see the seeds now of this anti-government movement that`s in some ways paralyzing the country.

See the full contract at C&L.

Share

Stormy Weather (Updated) 0

Mike Gruss, writing in my local rag, points out that the clean-up costs from Irene look to be quite high, despite it’s not having been another Hazel.

He then points out a storm is not an entertainment event and should not be so judged. A nugget:

Those who complain that an overhyped Irene underperformed are the same people who can’t distinguish a real natural disaster from a fictional movie.

If it’s on TV, to them, it’s all equal. That’s how Hurricane Irene, despite ruining cherished comic-book collections and newly installed air-conditioning units, became a box-office bust.

Afterthought:

After an informal survey of some of my friends (the persons who showed up an the TWUUG dinner), it appears that the Weather Channel was the primary hyper.

The local media coverage was fairly sane. Some of it was lame, but it wasn’t hysterical.

Addendum, Later that Same Day:

The Feral Genius comments from her post in Connecticut:

Which brings me to Hurricane Irene, which (despite warnings to the contrary) turned out to be an extremely minor storm, here in my little corner of Connecticut. And by “my little corner,” I specifically mean “my small city block, and the one next to mine.” Beyond that, though, the river overflowed its banks, and less than a mile in every direction were homes and businesses without electricity; roads either coated in mud from temporary flooding, or completely washed away, leaving flooded ravines where the roadbed used to be; a building that collapsed directly into the river less than ten minutes’ walk from my front door.

(snip)

In conclusion: despite the catastrophe unfolding in Vermont, the millions still without power on the East Coast, the dozens dead and all the other damage caused by Hurricane Irene, I personally suffered none of the ill effects the media warned me about. Thus, this was a minor fizzled-out nothing of a storm, and the warnings about it mere hype and bullshit. ’Cuz it’s all about me. Only me.

Share

Fundamentally Arrogant 0

Charles Madigan muses on punishments from God at the Chicago Trib. In the process, he encapsulates much that is wrong with the religious (sic) right.

A nugget (emphasis added).

Hurricanes are not sent to punish us. They are forces of nature created by weather patterns in the Atlantic over near Africa. And earthquakes that crack the Washington Monument are not warnings from heaven about budget deficits or gay people or even those damned Democrats.

Plates shifting, as plates have always been shifting. That’s what earthquakes are all about.

I think it is blasphemous to suggest we can know the mind of God, or even to assume that whatever God is, it is all about us. I am quite certain that God does not punish evil here on Earth because there is so much of it that goes unpunished, so much of it that is rewarded, in fact.

Share

QOTD 0

George Chapman, from the Quotemaster (subscribe here):

And let a scholar all earth’s volumes carry, he will be but a walking dictionary: a mere articulate clock.

Share

Dustbiters 0

One would expect that, sooner or later, the FDIC would run out of banks to close.

Looks like later.

Share

Surrounded by Enemies 2

Peter Bergman discusses the Republican fascination with enemies on EYKW.

It’s less than 12 minutes. Listen (NSFW).

He’s more optimistic than I.

Share

Chauncey de Vega Interviews “Whiteness” (Updated and Kicked to the Top) 2

The WARN interview. Just go read it.

An Exclusive Interview with “Whiteness,” Senior Adviser to the Tea Party GOP and Governor Rick Perry

Addendum, the Next Day:

Lawyers, Guns, and Money recalls when a court decreed that Finns were white:

John Svan was a Finnish immigrant to the United States. He came to this country sometime before 1882. But he was not considered white by the United States government. Why? He carried with him the blood of his “Mongolian” ancestors. This meant he could not become a citizen. Various laws were passed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, restricting US citizenship to those of the white and black races. These laws were intended to discriminate against Asians, but what about Finns. Were they white?

(snip)

This is from the 1908 court decision deciding that, in fact, Finns are white.

The excerpt from the 1908 court ruling is silly and sad at the same time.

Via Atrios.

Afterthought:

Over the years, there have been many attempts to prove the existence of “race” with “science.” Every one has been shown to be bunk.

“Race” does not exist.

But bigotry sure does.

Share

The Republican War on Science 0

God forbid that schools teach stuff.

Share

Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0

In a follow-up to this:

Last week, Bank of America apologized for mistakenly foreclosing on an elderly couple because they had made their mortgage payment too early. But that apology didn’t include reimbursing them $1,800 in legal fees or waiving late fees caused by the bank’s blunder.

After supporters of James and Sharon Bullington cried foul, the country’s biggest lender decided today to reimburse the legal fees and waive all late fees connected to its error.

Share

Plus Ca Climate Change 0

Steve Chapman skewers climate change deniers. A nugget:

They arrive at their position by reasoning backward: They reach a conclusion and snatch at any shred of evidence that justifies it. The climate change deniers don’t like the idea of governments restricting greenhouse gas emissions, so they insist that these emissions are nothing to worry about, that scientists are corrupt and that it’s all part of a socialist power grab.

They used to uphold respect for science. Now they prefer magical thinking.

Share

Republican Match-dot-com 0

Who is the latest heart-throb? Margaret Carlson handicaps the suitors at the Miami Herald. A nugget:

Perry’s being treated by George Will, William Kristol and other prominent conservatives as if he’s more than a passing fancy. Yet evidence from the past six months suggests that Republican love burns brightly and fades quickly.

There was that spring fling with Donald Trump, for example. Trump was in first place back in April in a Public Policy Polling survey, clocking in at 26 percent to Romney’s 15 percent, but he was a distant memory by the time Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann burst on the scene. While Sarah Palin played hard to get, Bachmann jumped into the race with both heels. Feisty, pretty, happy to let the United States default on its debt, she climbed from 6 percent to 14 percent in a month. By Aug. 13, the party activists who flock to the Iowa Straw Poll were sufficiently in love to give Bachmann a winning 29 percent of the vote in an eight-candidate field, knocking out Bachmann’s home-state competition, former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty.

It is rather like one of those romance comic books, isn’t it.

There’s always someone new along the Appalachian Trail.

Read more »

Share

Blaming the Victim 1

McClatchy discusses the apparent trend of blaming unemployed persons for, apparently, laying themselves off.

One manifestation of this is complaining that persons with no income pay no income taxes.

A nugget:

“There are statements about UI (unemployment insurance–ed.) recipients that are similar to statements about ‘welfare queens,’ and that shows a certain lack of sympathy with the situation of the unemployed,” said Wayne Vroman, an economist at the Urban Institute who specializes in unemployment insurance. “Any human endeavor has people who game the system, but to attribute this as a massive kind of rip-off by the unemployed doesn’t really match reality.”

The reality is that the economy isn’t creating jobs fast enough to re-employ the 8 million-plus who lost jobs in the Great Recession of 2007-09.

“People blame the chronically unemployed when, in fact, they’re the victim of a much larger economic calamity that’s beyond their control,” said Harold Pollack, a professor at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration.

Share

Pipe Dreamin’ Third Parties 0

Atrios:

Ultimately, that’s what all the “no labels,” “Unity08,” “We need a billionaire,” crap is about, imagining that there’s some sort of political Jesus out there who can implement my favored policies without worrying about the existing political institutions or the pesky voters.

Share

Shocking 0

Rage from the machine:

A Washington lawyer is accused of throwing a live power line at another motorist during a road-rage incident in the wake of Hurricane Irene.

Share

QOTD 0

Patricia Neal, from the Quotemaster (subscribe here):

A master can tell you what he expects of you. A teacher, though, awakens your own expectations.

Share

“Book ‘Em, Dano” 0

Luckovich
Click for a larger image.

Share

Twitches on Twitter 0

Christine O’Donnell proclaims, I am not a twitch.

Share

Time To Declare Victory and Come Home 1

Because “We’re already there” is not a reason to stay.

Because “We never admit a mistake” is not a reason to stay.

Because “It creates jobs for Blackwater Xe and Lockheed-Martin and Dupont” is not a reason to stay.

Because “We are accomplishing nothing and will accomplish nothing” is not a reason to stay.

Because “Mine is bigger than yours” is not a reason to stay.

Because “Youngsters need an opportunity to die for their country” is not a reason to stay.

Name me a reason to stay.

Share

Cantor’s Cant 0

Dick Polman wonders about Eric Cantor’s insistence that disaster aid be offset by budget cuts in other areas.

But I have questions for the Republican austerity cops. If they’re so committed to the principle of “pay as you go,” if they believe so fervently that fiscal conservatism should trump even the promotion of the “general welfare” (U.S. Constitution, Article I Section 8), then where were they just a few years ago, when the Bush administration launched two wars and successfully pushed a Medicare prescription plan – none of which was paid for?

In particular, why were Republicans so willing to ratify the invasion of Iraq without insisting that the high cost be “offset” by slashing other programs? Cantor never uttered a peep. How come it was OK in 2003 to indulge that neoconservative dream regardless of cost (the Iraq tab approaches $1 trillion), but it’s not OK in 2011 to help Americans recover from a natural disaster regardless of cost?

Gee, I wonder. Perhaps it has something do with who is president today, and who was president in 2003.

The answer is quite simple.

The contemporary Republican Party doesn’t have principles.

It has tactics.

Share

“An Armed Society Is Polite Society” 0

In discussing the arrest in Georgia of a promising NBA star, Leonard Pitts, Jr., gets to the heart and soul of gunnuttery:

A man or boy has a psychological — perhaps even biological — need to prove his capability, durability, fearlessness, toughness. Recognizing this, it would be a worthwhile mission for families, schools, worship houses and other community institutions working toward violence reduction to formulate means that allow boys to fulfill that imperative constructively.

At the very least, teach them that a gun is not a penis. It’s a tragedy that Crittenton didn’t know that.

Share