This website does not track you.
It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.
Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.
I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.
Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).
I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.
May 8, 2014 at 5:18 pm
No, I can’t imagine that Bill, Hill or Chel will delight in the Lewinsky story, but Eschaton is correct insofar as timing is concerned. Salaciousness aside, I welcome Monica being able to finally tell her side of the story given that she was run over by Bill and then backed over by Linda (Tripp) back in the day. And she’s a grown-up girl, at least now, in taking full responsibility for being half of what happened.
May 8, 2014 at 10:56 pm
I begrudge Monica nothing. She was sacrificed to the double standard.
I know more than I wish I knew about affairs. They are never one-way streets, even though it seems that the woman commonly gets ticketed for going the wrong way on those streets. The double-standard is alive and well.
What irks me is that, once again, the woman, whether wife or lover. is sacrificed to the double-standard by those who exempt the man while excoriating the woman. And a dollar to a doughnut that every one of them is guilt–oh, never mind.
What baffles me is why anyone would think that the wife who was betrayed (to use the common word) by an affair would consider it fodder for political hay. Anyone who would think like that has lost all touch with common decency. Then, again, “lost all touch with common decency” is a pretty good description of the commentariat, is it not?