From Pine View Farm

2017 archive

“. . . and Provide for the General Welfare.” 0

Shorter Badtux: “Yeah. Right.’

Share

QOTD 0

Voltaire:

Indeed, history is nothing more than a tableau of crimes and misfortunes.

Share

Shamed by the Bell 0

In the silence between the third and fourth movements of the first piece, as the conductor raised his baton, the cell phone rang from somewhere in the back of the concert hall. The conductor stood, motionless, as he and the musicians waited in silence for quiet to return.

Fortunately, I had remembered to mute my phone, so it wasn’t me.

Afterthought:

Later, as I returned from intermission, I remarked to the usher, who was quietly ushering in the hallway, “I’m glad I muted my cell phone.”

He was still laughing as I reentered the auditorium.

Share

A Matter of Lives 0

Writing in The Charlotte Observer, Tiffany Capers describes her own first #metoo moment, then moves a new topic to the discussion. Here’s an excerpt, in which she highlights some hypocrisy.

As a black woman, I don’t get to choose which aspect of my identity matters more. If I were to declare “Women’s lives matter,” your rebuttal probably wouldn’t be “No, all lives matter.” After all, I am a woman with #metoo stories. But if I say “Black lives matter,” some who believe my life matters as a woman don’t believe my life matters because I’m black.

Do please read the rest.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Frame One:  Donald Trump says, Click for the original image.

Share

Tin-Pot Trumpery 0

We are doomed.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Politeness takes practice.

Police said an accidental shooting happened at 3:45 p.m. The victim was in the woods target shooting with another person when the incident occurred.

Authorities said the victim was shot in the chest and died at the scene.

Share

Light Bloggery 0

Things to do.

Share

QOTD 0

Pete Townshend:

We tried not to age, but time had its rage.

Share

Predators on the Prowl 0

Jessica Valenti suggests that predatory behavior, far from being penalized, is too often rewarded. A snippet:

Perhaps it’s time to consider that abusive men aren’t rising to the top in spite of their disdain for women, but because of it. In a country where domineering bravado and casual misogyny can land a man in the White House, it’s not unreasonable to believe that this kind of behavior in men not only goes unpunished – but that it’s actively rewarded.

For too long, we’ve lauded men’s domination and aggressiveness as a sign of leadership rather than possible red flags. When men talk over everyone else in a room, we call it confidence rather than entitlement. If they berate others in meetings, we call them powerful and passionate, not bullying. And when they treat women at work differently than they do men, we’re told that they’re not sexist – they’re just “old-school.”

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

Andres Oppenheimer notes a contrast:

It works like this: When a foreign-born terrorist kills eight people, the president demands stricter immigration controls. But when a U.S.-born gunman kills 58 people, as happened a month ago in Las Vegas, Trump does not utter a word about the need for stricter gun laws.

Follow the link for the complete article.

Share

The Axman Cometh 0

Paul Ryan dressed as Pilgrim carrying an ax walks towards two turkeys labeled

Click for the original image.

Paul Krugman has the details. Here’s a nugget:

But I guess this is what you have to expect when you hand over the reins of power to a con man, whose whole career has been based on convincing naïve marks that he’s a brilliant deal maker, but turns out to have no idea how to actually govern.

Oh, wait — did you think I was talking about Donald Trump? I’m talking about Paul Ryan, the speaker of the House, an obvious phony who nonetheless convinced the rubes — that is, much of the news media and the political establishment — that he was a brilliant fiscal expert. What we’re witnessing now is the end of the charade, the political equivalent of what happened when graduates of Trump University tried to get some value in return for their money.

Share

Rule of Lawless, One More Time 0

Peter Baker takes a look at Donald Trump’s recent belittling of law enforcement. The whole article is worth a read, but I think the introduction sums up the key bit (emphasis added):

One of President Donald Trump’s biggest disappointments in office, by his own account, was discovering that he is not supposed to personally direct law enforcement decisions by the Justice Department and the FBI. So, instead, he has made himself into perhaps the most vocal critic of America’s system of justice ever to occupy the Oval Office.

In other words, he’s mad because he can’t get his way.

Follow the link to see why I said that.

Share

The Fox Fear Factory 0

Thom looks back on Fox News’s greatest greatest hits and how Fox lies got us to where we are. Pulled together in one summary, it’s an impressive resume of serial dishonesty in pursuit of political gain.

Share

The Court Is in Session 0

Elie Mystal suggests–well, to be precise, states outright–that Attorney-General Jeff Sessions is a “zealous theocrat.”

Methinks he has a point.

Share

Brazile Nuts? 0

Josh Marshall tries to figure out just what Donna Brazile is hoping to accomplish with her recent revelations, which are not, in fact, revelations, that Hillary Clinton’s campaign has a fund-raising agreement with the DNC, as too did the Sanders campaign.

Here’s a nugget:

As I wrote above, it’s not clear to me that the description of the joint fundraising agreement is accurate. Even if it is, accurate, “rigged” is a highly, highly loaded word. It slices into the heart of the divisions currently tearing at the Democratic party. But we watched the 2016 primaries unfold in real time. What did the DNC do to rig the primaries? We hear a lot about scheduling primary debates on Saturdays. But c’mon. If primary debate scheduling – which was eventually tossed aside in any case – was enough to defeat Sanders that’s a pretty sad commentary. Clinton was the establishment candidate. It’s no secret that Wasserman-Schultz favored Clinton over Sanders. The party’s establishment and apparatus were more supportive of her. We know that. That’s what it means to be the ‘establishment candidate’. But did she or the DNC do things that made it impossible for Sanders to win or even made it any harder for him to win? I see no evidence of that.

Share

QOTD 0

Mia Farrow:

I get it now; I didn’t get it then. That life is about losing and about doing it as gracefully as possible… and enjoying everything in between.

Share

The Pusher Men 0

Share

On the House (and the Senate) 0

Waiter labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

The Rule of Lawless, Reprise 0

Dick Polman.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.