From Pine View Farm

2017 archive

Selective Perception 0

Will Bunch marvels at the ability to Trumpkins, even Trumpkins who have since regretted their support of Trump, to look at Donald Trump and see a person who does not and never has existed.

Aside:

I read the same article that Bunch writes about. The author’s talent for rationalization does rather take one aback.

Share

Cavalcade of Stupid 0

Lance Dotson, a Republican operative from Maine, offers his diagnosis of the Republican Party’s current pathology:

But my party has become a gathering place for buffoonery.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

QOTD 0

Brian Moore:

The silent majority distrusts people who believe in causes.

Share

The Hollow Men 0

Dick Polman reports that, as Trump administration spokespersons were not to be found on the Sunday yak shows, the networks turned to the D-list. He stands aghast at Jerry Falwell, Jr.’s, performance on Meet the Press. Here’s a bit from his column (emphasis added–follow the link for the whole article):

Was Falwell offended when Trump equated Nazis and white supremacists with those who showed up to oppose Nazism and white supremacism? Was Falwell offended when Trump said there were “very fine people” among the marchers who carried Nazi flags?

Ah, nope. Falwell replied: “I didn’t hear anything there that would offend somebody.”

Falwell sorta conceded that perhaps Trump could’ve been more sensitive to “my friends in the Jewish community,” that perhaps “he could be more polished and more politically correct.”

(Hang on a sec. Since when is it “politically correct” to condemn Nazis? Didn’t we conclude as a nation, on a bipartisan basis 75 years ago, that Nazis were bad?)

He goes on to report that Falwell asserted that Trump “spoke from his heart.”

If this is indeed the case, and there is no reason to doubt it, said heart is not a pretty place. Nor are the hearts of ones who would defend it.

Share

Protection Money 0

You can’t make this stuff up.

The Secret Service can no longer pay hundreds of agents it needs to carry out an expanded protective mission – in large part due to the sheer size of President Trump’s family and efforts necessary to secure their multiple residences up and down the East Coast.

Secret Service Director Randolph “Tex” Alles, in an interview with USA TODAY, said more than 1,000 agents have already hit the federally mandated caps for salary and overtime allowances that were meant to last the entire year.

This is what happens when you run the government like one of Danald Trump’s businesses–one bankruptcy after another.

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

Over the Threshold 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Gordon C. Nagayama Hall notes that white persons in the United States have higher thresholds for–that is, are less able to identify–racism and racist behavior than are others. He offers several reasons that could account for that. Here’s one:

A third reason for high thresholds for racism is lack of awareness. Research indicates that both Whites and Blacks who could not distinguish historical facts from fiction about racism were less likely to detect racism on a subsequent test.

  • An example of an historical fact is, “The F.B.I. has employed illegal techniques (e.g., hidden microphones in motels) in an attempt to discredit African American political leaders during the civil rights movement”.
  • An example of a false statement is, “African American Paul Ferguson was shot outside of his Alabama home for trying to integrate professional football”.
  • An example of racism from the test is, “Several people walk into a restaurant at the same time. The server attends to all the White customers first. The last customer served happens to be the only person of color”.

Follow the link for the remainder of the reasons.

Share

Phoning It In 0

Pig:  Whatcha reading, Goad?  Goat:  This book on drug addiction in the 1970s.  It was so widespread.  Pig:  What do you mean by addiction?  Goat:  Well, the drug becomes the focus of your life.  You can't stop.  And you slowly withdraw from the people closest to you.  Pig:  That's nuts.  I can't see that happening to our generation.  Goat:  You can't see what happening?  (Pause as Goat looks a his smartphone and crowds or persons walk by, unspeaking, while tapping on their phones' screens.)  Pig:  Nothing.  Goat:  Uh huh.  Right.


Click for the original image.

(Open tag fixed.)

Share

From the “Party of Lincoln” to the “Party of Stinkin'” 0

As I’ve noted several times, today’s Republican Party is the creation and the legacy of Richard Nixon. Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” his decision to woo bigots and racists during his second campaign drew them into the party and they have no commandeered it.

Leonard Pitts, Jr., sums it up; here’s a bit:

But without question, the most repugnant contribution to this new dawn of white supremacy comes from the Republican Party.

(snip)

Its machinations have delivered to the GOP the presidency and both houses of Congress. Yet seldom has a party controlled so much and looked so bad doing it. Republicans find themselves saddled with an incompetent president elected on an implicit promise to make America white again. Under him, they are able to accomplish exactly nothing. They cringe as he suggests moral equivalence between bigots and those who protest them. As if all that were not bad enough, a newly revived hate movement now arrives, looking to cash in its chits.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Remember, practice makes polite.

When officials arrived they found the male victim suffering from a gunshot wound to the hip.

The sheriff’s office says the male was target practicing on the property at the time of the shooting. Deputies say it appears that another male accidentally shot the victim.

Aside:

Y’know, if they can’t even get practice right, how well do you think they will do in the big game?

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Secessionist frolics.

Share

Continuous Campaign Cacophony 0

Farron scornfully points out the the Trump administration is already working on deceptive campaign 2020 commercials.

Share

QOTD 0

Dick Gregory:

Everything we do we should look at in terms of millions of people who can’t afford it.

Share

Meta: Finger Follies 0

I’ve figured out and fixed why, if you came to the main welcome page for this site and clicked the link for the blog, you would get a malformed nada, nothing, zilch.

It was a typo.

Blasted computers, wnat you tu splet stuf rite.

Share

Target Audience 0

The son of the founder of the white nationalist website, Stormfront, who has renounced his father’s views, tells what America’s Neo-Nazi, white supremacist movement looked like from the inside and why he finds it dangerous. Here’s how he starts out (emphasis added):

My dad often gave me the advice that white nationalists are not looking to recruit people on the fringes of American culture, but rather the people who start a sentence by saying, “I’m not racist, but …”

Much more at the link.

Afterthought:

Natch, “I’m not racist, but” means “I’m a racist, and.”

It’s a corollary to what I learned back when I did management training in communications skills:

“Yes, but” always means “No.”

Share

Monumental Stupidity 0

Two bystanders looking at statue of GOP Elephant impaled on sword.  Sign on base says,


Click for the original image.

In related news, my local rag reports that there might be some cracks appearing in the base.

Share

Smile, You’re on Candid Camera 0

Share

Trial Separation? 0

Several advisory boards to the President have recently resigned en mass as a result of Trump’s embrace of Neo-Nazis and his mealy-mouthed refusal to condemn the Confederate insurgency in Charlottesville, Virginia. Admittedly these groups are largely symbolic, but there is a larger symbolism in their resignations.

At the Washington Monthly, Nancy LeTourneau considers the implications of corporate CEOs’ jump off the Trump ship. A snippet (follow the link for the complete article:

Our current president is now getting the same kind of treatment from corporate CEOs over his racist remarks that Republican governors and state legislators have been getting over other so-called “cultural issues.” But that exacerbates a collision with what we’ve called “nostalgia voters,” or the “confederate insurgency” that has been ignited to defend against the very racial/sexual/religious changes that threaten their world view.

This move brings into focus a growing fissure within the Republican Party. Historically, corporate leaders have been one of the key members of the Republican coalition—along with military hawks and white evangelicals. But some of the cultural issues that define the attachment of evangelicals to the party are the very ones that are driving the corporate world away.

The conventional wisdom is that the Republican Party’s corporate masters have been willing to tolerate the Republican Party’s bigots and culture warriors so long as the corporations get the tax cuts and other breaks they want. It will be curious to see whether Trumpery leads to the dissolution of that uneasy partnership.

Share

“Look in the Mirror, Boy,” Reprise 0

Der Spiegle devotes another editorial to Donald Trump, and this one is a barn-burner. I find this telling sentence:

A president who relativizes Nazi violence and who knowingly and intentionally seeks to show solidarity with the right-wing fringe is a national disgrace.

Follow the link for the rest of the sentences.

Share

Southern Twistory, Reprise 0

Werner Herzog’s Bear takes down the talking point that removing memorials to American traitors is somehow “destroying history.” (History can be misinterpreted, reinterpreted, explored, even forgotten, but it cannot be destroyed, for its fruits are all around us.) Here’s a nugget (emphasis in the original):

Confederate monuments created a white supremacist usable past.Other people have written about this, but it bears repeating: the vast majority of Civil War monuments in the South were built during the height of Jim Crow. They were not immediate responses to the war. They are also intended to push a certain interpretation of the war, the “Lost Cause.” This narrative essentially said that the white South was the superior side fighting for a just cause, and only lost due to the material superiority of the Union. These monuments defended the old slaveocracy at a time when lynchings and other incidents of racial violence were accelerating. By being erected after Reconstruction and during Jim Crow, they are not mourning a defeat in the Civil War, but actually celebrating the victory of white supremacy in its aftermath. Context matters.

Share

Southern Twistory 0

In The Roanoke Times, Halford Ryan explodes the myths that neo-Confederates and apologists for the South’s rebellion to preserve slavery tell themselves. Here’s one; follow the link for more:

The hoary defense of hearth and home is counterfeit. President Davis’ CSA was the aggressor (the Secesh fired on Fort Sumter in April–ed.). As for Virginia, her voters adopted an Ordinance of Secession on May 23, 1861. On July 21, 1861, Federal troops initially invaded Virginia at the First Battle of Bull Run. By that time, Virginia had already seceded and had already joined a Confederacy that had already waged war on the Union. Only by an abuse of logic and language can neo-Confederates claim that the War Between the States was a defensive war. But, neo-Confederates still fan the flames for that fake fact.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.