From Pine View Farm

Middle East 3

Those of you who read carefully will note that I have avoided saying anything about who I think might be right and who might be wrong in the Arab-Israeli situation–I say Arab-Israeli because the conflict transcends the current horrors in Lebanon and northern Israel.

I have referred to thoughts from others that I felt merited consideration, and I have been quite vocal (bloggal?) about my opinion of my own country’s failure to do anything concrete to moderate the current Israel-Lebanon situation. (Aside: it seems quite clear to me that the current Federal Administration is willing to let the deaths continue, thinking it will somehow aid the United States, or, more likely, aid the Republican Party in November–remember, with this bunch, everything is political.)

Now there are some who believe that unconditional support of Israel is somehow a condition of being American. And that anyone who does not support Israel unconditionally is a tool of the Islamo-fascists (a term the nuttier fringe of the right-wing tends to hurl at anyone who doesn’t buy their vision of a theocratic America ruled by Emperor Dick George and Jester Karl).

Sadly for those folks, the world ain’t so simple as that. The only thing I know of that is 99.99% pure is Dove soap. The rest of us have good days and bad days, and, frankly, a person who has more good days than bad days over the course of his life has done pretty well.

The main reason that I haven’t said anything is that I am suffering a serious case of Mixed Emotions.

Today, we had some phone trouble at work; since my work life revolves around the telephone, I took advantage of that to catch up with some recreational reading. I stumbled across this in an old Washington Post chat involving Gene Weingarten, a humorist and author who inherited Dave Barry’s spot in the Washington Post Magazine when Dave Barry stopped writing his column (ironically, Weingarten, when he was an editor at the Miami Herald, gave Barry his start and the two remain good friends).

This exchange illustrated probably as well as anything I could have come up with the Mixed-Emotion-ness. These comments were made in 2002. That they still seem relevant today testifies to the world’s failure to do anything to make this situation better.

Note this well: I am not saying that I agree with everything Mr. Weingarten said. And I cannot see it entirely from his perspective, since I am not Jewish; I’m about as WASP as one can be. I am saying that I do not think I could have expressed the Mixed-Emotion-ness any more effectively that did he:

Washington, D.C.: So, what about the Middle East? Seriously. Where do you stand?

Gene Weingarten: For some reason, I get (and do not answer) a version of this question every chat. I am obviously not going to make jokes about the Mideast right now; knowing that, why why would anyone care what I think? I never even graduated from college. The only subject on which I am an expert is the uniform numbers of the 1961 New York Yankees.

However, I’ll answer this because I respect the anarchy of this chat business, and because it will allow me to, in the future, guiltlessly decline to answer the same question on the grounds that I already have.

I feel awful for both sides in the Mideast conflict, but my sympathies lean more toward the Israelis, and not for the reasons you may think. I am Jewish, but my sense of self is not wrapped up in that. My wife is not Jewish, and my children were not raised Jewish, and, as far as a religion, I consider myself mostly a practicing smartass.

I am absolutely certain that both sides can make an inarguable historical case for why they are right. On the merits, therefore, I take no position; I am way too ignorant. As a gut feeling, I favor the Israelis because Israel is, mostly, a modern secular democracy. They elect their leaders. They worry incessantly about their schools. Their politics shares the ludicrous insanity of ours. Whatever the excesses of their government, whatever the evils of occupation, I think the Israeli people are pretty much like us.

I am totally creeped out by the theology of death that the Palestinians have opportunistically embraced. I cannot shake from my head the TV images of Palestinian women ululating in glee on September 11th, and the Palestinian man who spoke almost no English, but managed to tell a British cameraman his reaction: “More!’ I do not understand a culture that encourages the mother of an 18 year old suicide bomber to beam with pride at his accomplishment. I am horrified by a political structure, in a sexually repressed society, that feeds to its youth the promise of 70 virgins in heaven so “perfect’ they do not menstruate or urinate. Creeps me out, big time.

Also, I don’t think any political movement worth anything has ever relentlessly targeted innocents; I think Gandhi and King made the same point.

So, yeah, I am biased. However, I think the fact of the suicide bombings reveals utter desperation and hopelessness that cannot be ignored. I am certain living under occupation is dehumanizing. It seems to me the only solution here is for the Israelis to vacate all occupied territories and make whatever other concessions are necessary for the entire world to conclude they lost, big time. It needs to be seen as a total capitulation. The current Israeli government will fall, which is not a bad thing. Then, if the Palestinians continue to kill innocents, they will be telling the world that their real motive all along has been the annihilation of a Jewish state — an important lesson to learn, and one that should indelibly affect world opinions. And if peace DOES occur, and last — then we will look at what these two societies have made of themselves in the next 20 years, and decide who really won.

That’s it. Issue closed. Back to jokes.

Share

3 comments

  1. Opie

    August 10, 2006 at 8:41 pm

    “Then, if the Palestinians continue to kill innocents, they will be telling the world that their real motive all along has been the annihilation of a Jewish state — an important lesson to learn, and one that should indelibly affect world opinions.”

    What a noble sacrifice he is willing to make! Is he going to go there and participate?

    But this goes back to what I have marveled at for a couple of weeks now – the number of people in this country who say, “Yes, the Israelis believe in democracy, yes, the Islamists believe in Sharia law and rule by force, yes, Hezbollah was elected by nobody but provokes violence in the neighborhoods of the Lebanese people it hypocritically claims to champion, but gee, I just don’t know which side I’m on here…”

     
  2. Frank

    August 15, 2006 at 7:59 pm

    Unfortunately for this argument, it is not only Hizbullah who killed innocents during the last four weeks.

    I harken back to this post:

    http://frankwbell.no-ip.info/weblog/?p=661

    It is not true that Israel can do no wrong, nor is it true that Arabs can do no right.

    This does not constitute a vote in favor of either side. Rather, it makes for a clear view of human nature.

    I think Gene Weingarten expressed this very well.

     
  3. Opie

    August 16, 2006 at 5:07 pm

    That’s exactly what amazes me, that it does not constitute a vote for either side. Do you really see the sum of Israeli values and the sum of Hezbollah values as morally equal?