From Pine View Farm

Endless War category archive

All Guns, No Ifs, Ands, or Butter 0

Will Bunch considers Donald Trump’s budget proposal. He does not like what it portends. Here’s a bit (emphasis added):

The playwright Anton Chekhov once famously wrote, “If you say in the first chapter that there is a rifle hanging on the wall, in the second or third chapter it absolutely must go off.” No one knows where Chekhov’s gun will go off for Trump — in Syria, or Latvia, or North Korea or the South China Sea. But it will go off.

Because war is just what authoritarians do. So is this budget — a tinhorn dictator budget, the budget of an immature boy-king who’s in love with the cold steel of tanks but has zero empathy for America’s humanity, let alone the National Endowment for the Humanities.

Share

War and Mongers of War 0

I hope Farron is overstating things. I fear not.

Welcome to pariah patriotism.

Share

Trumpling the Bomb 0

I remember sitting on the side porch in the 1950s and feeling relief that, in the event of World War III, we were within the radius of the nuclear attack that would most certainly be delivered to Norfolk Naval Base, so I would not be around for the aftermath.

If Trump wins, I can comfort myself with that same thought.

Via TPM.

Share

The Difference between “Remembrance” and “Remembering” 0

Jim Wright.

Read it.

Share

“Secret Plans” 0

BadTux spills the secret:

The last time a Presidential candidate said he had a secret plan to end a war, it cost 25,000 American lives, the lives of half a million Laotians, Cambodians, and Vietnamese, roughly a trillion dollars in today’s money — and we lost anyhow . . . .

Share

ISIS, Origins Issue 0

Thom explains how ISIS arose from the Neoliberal paradise resulting from President George the Worst’s Great and Glorious Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq.

Share

Taking Redaction 0

Share

War and Mongers of War 0

Shorter Ted Cruz: Existence of hate means we need more hate.

Image of Statue of Liberty holding American flag re-imagined as Gay Pride flag with quotation from Harvey Milk:  More persons have been slaughtered in the name of religion than for any other single reason.  That is the true perversion.

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Cannon Fodderers 2

Bob Chernow, Milwaukee businessman and veteran, is fed up with the chicken hawks, those politicians and lobbyists willing to send the children of others to die for the sake of short-term domestic political and personal gain (which leads to as good a definition of “unjust war” as I am likely to hear). A snippet:

You might find it strange that I don’t worry about those who avoided service in the Vietnam War. If you had money or connections or some smarts, you avoided the draft. I even find forgiveness for sincere war protesters such as Jane Fonda who took a stand against an unjust war and were taken advantage of by the enemy.

But I do take issue with chicken hawks who dodged the draft or shirked their duty during war but advocated that others fight and perhaps die in war. This lack of character is prominent among many elected officials.

Read the rest.

Share

Your Military-Industrial Complex at Work 0

Read the tale of “Fat Leonard.” Here’s just a tiny bit:

In perhaps the worst national-security breach of its kind to hit the Navy since the end of the Cold War, Francis doled out sex and money to a shocking number of people in uniform who fed him classified material about U.S. warship and submarine movements. Some also leaked him confidential contracting information and even files about active law enforcement investigations into his company.

He exploited the intelligence for illicit profit, brazenly ordering his moles to redirect aircraft carriers to ports he controlled in Southeast Asia so he could more easily bilk the Navy for fuel, tugboats, barges, food, water and sewage removal.

Over at least a decade, according to documents filed by prosecutors, Glenn Defense ripped off the Navy with little fear of getting caught because Francis had so thoroughly infiltrated the ranks.

The company forged invoices, falsified quotes and ran kickback schemes. It created ghost subcontractors and fake port authorities to fool the Navy into paying for services it never received.

Francis and his firm have admitted to defrauding the Navy of $35 million, though investigators believe the real amount could be much greater.

Share

Collateral Damage 0

The old bumper sticker from my youth was correct. War is hazardous to humans and other living things.

New research indicates that war causes CTE.

Follow the link for an article as depressing as it is long.

Share

Lessons of History 0

Man reading newspaper to daughter:  We're friends now, but Vietnam was a terrible quagmire.  Daughter, looking at news from Iraq on laptop:  And the quagmires continue.

Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

“Words Mean What I Want Them To Mean” 0

At The Nation, William J. Astore considers the vocabulary of endless war. One might say that his article is an extrordinary rendition of enhanced obfuscation techniques.

A snippet:

In the future, some linguist or lexicographer will doubtless compile a dictionary of perpetual war and perhaps (since they may be linked) imperial decline, focusing on the grim processes and versions of failure language can cloak. It would undoubtedly explore how certain words and rhetorical devices were used in 21st-century America to obscure the heavy burdens that war placed on the country, even as they facilitated its continuing failed conflicts. It would obviously include classic examples like surge, used in both Iraq and Afghanistan to obscure the way our government rushed extra troops into a battle zone in a moment of failure, only ensuring the extension of that failure, and the now-classic phrase shock and awe that obscured the reality of a massive air strike on Baghdad that resulted in the deaths of dozens of civilians (“collateral damage”), but not the “decapitation” of a hated regime.

Share

I Want To Teach the World To Sing
In Perfect Hegemony
Reprise
0

Harry Shearer interviews Andrew Bacevich about Bacevich’s new book detailing the America’s four decade misadventure in the Middle East.

It is a must-listen. The interview starts about five minutes in.

Share

“I Want To Teach the World To Sing
in Perfect Hegemony”
0

At the Boston Review, Stephen Kinzer interviews Andrew Bacevich on the mess in the Middle East and how it got way. Bacevich argues convincingly that it’s all about the oil, complicated by hubris and misunderstanding, in short, a desire to be God Emperors of Dunes.

A snippet:

SK: Were the interventions of those three presidents (Bush the First, Clinton, and George the Worst–ed.) in the Middle East still mainly about oil?

AB: The rationales were becoming more diffuse. Yes, oil remained a core interest—not only oil to be consumed at home but also oil to fuel the rest of the industrialized world, meaning many of our allies. But by this stage, there is something else: an effort, however ill-considered and lacking in specificity, to capitalize on the end of the Cold War, claiming the mantle of sole superpower, with U.S. military supremacy the ultimate manifestation of that status. Throughout the 1980s and ’90s, the United States attempted to assert hegemony over a large part of the Islamic world. Again, there was no master plan. It was haphazard. It was arrogant. It was undertaken without any appreciation for the complexities involved or for what exertions hegemony would actually require.

Read the rest.

Share

Locked and Loaded 0

Image of missile silos with Donald Trump's head sticking out of one of them.  Caption:  Which nuclear warhead should scare us the most?


Click to see the original image.

Share

Have Guns, Will Travel 0

Swampwater rides again!

Warning: Language.

Share

American Taliban: Jingo Unchained 0

Werner Herzog’s Bear thinks that the punditocracy is overlooking the central appeal of Donald Trump, even as they clutch their pearls and fall on their fainting couches, in the grip of the vapors at his ungentlemanly behavior.

Mr. Bear believes that uniting Trump’s appeals to bigotry, racism, and xenophobia is an overweening theme of aggressive nationalism*. I urge you to read his full piece; here’s a bit:

The lack of an understanding of the centrality of nationalism in American history and politics is causing many pundits to just miss the boat. They scratch their heads and say “Trump is getting support from across class and regional and religious lines, how is he doing this?” He’s doing it because nationalism is a force that has the ability to transcend other identities and bring people together who might not normally see themselves on the same team. It is a force that can whip up the masses in a frothy frenzy to be channeled by demagogues.

About the same time that Mr. Bear was forming his post, Giles Fraser of The Guardian offered his theory as to how Americans who loudly and vociferously proclaim their fealty to Jesus Christ can espouse policies that directly counter his words as reported in the four Gospels:

It has long been presumed that America is more Christian than Europe. But it’s a myth. Of course, way more people go to church in America. And you can’t become president without holding up your floppy Bible and attending prayer breakfasts. But what the Donald Trump phenomenon reveals is what several intelligent Christian observers have been saying for some time: that a great many Americans don’t really believe in God. They just believe in America – which they often take to be the same thing. God was hacked by the American dream some time ago. “The evangelical church in America has, to a large extent, been co-opted by an American, religious version of the kingdom of the world. We have come to trust the power of the sword more than the power of the cross,” writes Gregory Boyd in The Myth of a Christian Nation.

In short, he suggests that American fundamentalists evangelicals whatever they call themselves today you know who I mean have replaced the Prince of Peace with a God of War–that they have built their own Golden Christ, wrapped in an American flag, carrying an M16, and piloting a Predator drone.

Frankly, I think that both writers are onto something. In particular, it is much easier for persons to change their god than it is for them to change themselves. Christianists (or, as Michael in Norfolk calls them, “Christofascists”) have taken that step.

______________________

*Left implicit is the “white’ in nationalism.

Share

Plus Ca Change 0

Shorter Dan Simpson: It’s deja vu all over again.

Share

The Candidates Debate 0

Jim Wright is having trouble absorbing what he heard. A snippet:

I opened the live feed to watch in stunned revulsion as the men who would be president of the United States of America argued over which one of them was more insane.

Carpet bombing? Waterboarding? And the crowd cheered.

The crowd cheered.

What in the holy hell is it with these goddamned people?

When did the unabashed willingness to engage in the indiscriminate obliteration of entire populations, when did the enthusiastic willingness to torture our enemies, when did those things become traits anybody liberal or conservative would want in an American president?

Follow the link. Read the rest.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.