Health and Sanity category archive

Americablog:

An increasing number of employers are cutting health insurance for spouses. Thankfully, the numbers are still quite small, but the increasing numbers of spouses being dropped should be reason for concern.

Besides record corporate profits, the insurance companies have been doing quite well also — but this move suggests they want even higher profit margins, since spouses who are not working tend to use health insurance more.

The only thing “insurance” companies want to ensure is executives’ country club memberships.

In case you wondered why television is littered with ads for products you can’t buy without a doctor’s order, Barnum had the answer: There’s one born every minute.

More than a third of doctors said they prescribe brand name drugs simply because patients ask for them even when cheaper generics would be appropriate, according to a new study.

The practice, which can contribute to higher health care costs, was found to be more likely among doctors who received free drug samples or free food from drug companies or who had financial relationships with drug companies.

A doctor began to wonder where his patients were getting their outlandish ideas about supplements and miracle cures.

He dared to look behind the curtain and found himself in a TV wonderland.

To understand where his patients were getting their health advice, Charlap began watching the program. “I was shocked that someone with his credentials — someone who apparently still operates on patients and therefore must still be fully cognizant of a physician’s first priority, which is to do no harm — would be recommending all types of different pills, many that had never undergone rigorous scientific scrutiny, as miracle cures or magic pills to a very susceptible audience.”

Much more at the link.

Your for-profit hospitals are at work, demonstating how competition lowers prices.

A nugget from a long story in the Charlotte Observer:

North Carolina patients are likely to pay more for routine health care if their doctors are employed by a hospital, an investigation by the Observer and the News & Observer of Raleigh has found.

It’s true for services ranging from heart tests to routine office visits. And it’s part of a national shift that experts say is raising costs but not quality.

Hospitals are increasingly buying doctors’ practices, then sending bills for routine services that are significantly higher than those charged by independent doctors.

Just gotta pay for those country club memberships so the hospital administrators can get their exercise.

We need single payer.

Susan comments on the Zuckerboard:

So many Facebooks. So little substance.

Listen to this lady’s story.

From the website:

BETH ANN SWAN is dean and professor at the Jefferson School of Nursing at Thomas Jefferson University. With 30 years working as a nurse clinician, researcher, educator and administrator, it would seem likely that she would be more able than most to navigate our complicated health care system, but after her husband Eric suffered a serious brain stem stroke while on a trip to Chicago, Swan learned first hand how challenging it can be for patients who are still recovering to transition from hospital to home. Swan has written about their experiences in an article, “Narrative Matters”, published in the November 2012 issue of Health Affairs. She joins us in this hour of Radio Times to talk about how fragmented the health care system can be, what she learned from being a caregiver and the valuable role nursing can play in assuring the health and well-being of patients. We’ll also hear from MARY NAYLOR of the University of Pennsylvania who has developed an innovative model of care relying on advanced practice nurses to help people make the difficult transition from hospital to home.

Follow the link or listen below:

This is twice my salary for my first full-time job:

Annual premiums for job-based family health insurance went up just 4 percent this year, but that’s no comfort with the price tag approaching $16,000 and rising more than twice as fast as wages.

The underspending rebate checks mandated by the ACA are starting to arrive.

Wonder how many insurance company country-club memberships will go begging?

Aetna told Averback, a freelance writer in Huntingdon Valley, that it was sending her the money because of the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare. The law requires that insurers spend 80 percent of premium dollars on actual health care and quality improvement, not administration, or pay a rebate. (The threshold is 85 percent for plans with more than 50 people.)

In the Pennsylvania individual market, Aetna Life Insurance Co., which also sells health insurance, spent just 67.1 percent of the money collected from subscribers in 2011 on health care. Averback’s check was a rebate.

Once she realized that the check was real, she had another thought. “I guess that shows you how much they were ripping me off,” she said.

Papa John’s claims that providing health care for employees might cost as much at fourteen cents a pizza.

That’s too much for Colbert:

There has to be a line we do not cross. And it’s fourteen cents.

If we sit idly by while everyone gets access to doctors for fourteen cents a pizza, tomorrow it may be three cents a taco.

Via TPM.

Via Raw Story.

Hospital bill to rape victim for the post-rape examination.

Via Contradict Me.

Matt Miller expresses wonderment:

Only in America could a Democratic president pass Mitt Romney’s health plan and fund it partly through John McCain’s best idea from the last campaign (taxing some employer-provided plans) and be branded a “socialist.”

Still true:

. . . as I was in the previous post, score one for the forces of truth, justice, and the American way over thuggery.

Afterthought:

This is why I have generally ignored all the agonizing over how the decision would turn out.

PoliticalProf had to go to the doctor, which set him to wondering (emphasis added):

. . . I always knew two things: I have good insurance, and even if my insurance had not been accepted, I have money. I can pay to visit the doctor and get the immediate care I need.

What has struck me throughout the whole debate about healthcare in America is how few people like me . . . can then take the next step and ask: what if I didn’t have the money? What would I have done?

Read the rest.

In case you wondered why the Republican Party is adamantly opposed to reforming the US health care system, consider this bit from MarketWatch:

If the court decides the law is unconstitutional, high-income taxpayers would avoid a 3.8% tax hike on investment earnings, plus a 0.9% increase in their payroll taxes, come 2013.

For people in the top 1% of income earners, avoiding those two tax provisions would translate into savings of, on average, about $21,000 per year, according to the Tax Policy Center, a joint venture of the Brookings Institution and Urban Institute.

And the richest Americans — the top 0.1% — would avoid about $125,000 more in taxes per year on average if the health law is overturned.

It is living up to its core mission: to make the rich, richer and the poor, poorer.

Making the poor sicker and the sick poorer is just collateral damage.

Via BartCop.

Thom explains why the rest of the world thinks we are crazy: