From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

All the News that Fits 0

Consider what news reporting would be like if all news worked like Fox News.

Share

Anomie 0

Thom and Richard Wolff discuss American gun massacres and wonder what about American society produces these solitary wolf predators.

Share

Literacy Test 0

Gina Barreca suggests that we would be wise to expect our leaders to be literate. A bit:

Would you agree, to choose a random example, that a president of these United States should be able to construct, articulate and comprehend a document of more than three pages, and be able to read that document aloud while demonstrating, through appropriate intonation, emphasis and facial expressions that he grasps the implication of what the document says?

I do.

Apparently this marks me as an “elitist” when it comes to education. But, to those who accuse me of elitism, I want to borrow the words of Inigo Montoya from “The Princess Bride”: “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Share

Just the Facts, Ma’am 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Alice LoCicero provides an interesting set of links to studies about the positive correlation between the “presence of firearms and violence.”

I commend her article to your attention.

(When you read the article, you will understand why this happened.)

Share

Many Happy Returns, Reprise 0

Dick Polman runs the numbers and includes a quote from my elected representative incongruously assembled:

And if you’re not into numbers, here’s Virginia Republican congressman Scott Taylor: “I don’t know how you get around that this wasn’t a referendum on the administration, I just don’t. Some of the very divisive rhetoric really prompted and helped usher in a really high Democratic turnout in Virginia.”

Scott Taylor is a full-blown wingnut, but one who, like many Virginia wingnuts, knows how to behave in public.

By the by, this is perhaps the most surprising and most gratifying single result of this election.

Share

All the News that Fits 0

We don’t talk about things like that in this family.

Share

Swift Retribution 0

Joe Patrice explains that, no, copyright doesn’t work like that.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

Josh Marshall highlights a troubling trend, one which surprises nobody who pays attention. A snippet:

The ratchet like pattern is clear. The more Trump fails as President, the more he is convinced he requires extra-constitutional powers. More directly, the more he fails he seems to be convinced that his advisors are mistaken when they tell him the ad hoc command regime he used to run his private business won’t work in government. He’s tried their way he says and look what it’s gotten him.

Share

Sleep Fright 0

Little girl in bed says, Click for the original image.

Share

Facebook Frolics, Russian Impulses Dept. 0

Via C&L.

Share

Common Denominator 0

The New York Times wonders what could possibly account for the United States’s highest-in-the-world rate of mass shootings. Oh golly gosh gee, I wonder what it could be.

Read more »

Share

Let the Massacres Continue 0

Daniel Ruth excoriates the response of Donald Trump and many others to the most recent American gun massacre. If his column sounds kind of tired, the words “most recent” in the preceding sentence may give you a hint as to why. Here’s a snippet (emphasis added):

Trump dismissed the Sutherland Springs tragedy as the perverse handiwork of an individual with “mental health” issues. “This isn’t a guns situation,” the president of the United States said before resuming his thoughts and prayers.

Even more bizarrely, Trump expressed astonishment that a gunman could enter a church in rural Texas and kill 26 people. “Who would think a thing like this could ever happen?” he wondered.

To answer Trump’s question there in second paragraph, anyone who pays freaking attention to the headlines, for Pete’s sake.

This is the very picture of weaponized imbecility.

Share

“Weaponized Imbecility” 0

PoliticalProf.

Share

“Playing the Trump Card” 0

Via C&L.

Share

It’s Deja Vu All Over Again 0

The Des Moines Register’s, Dick Goodson reports that he feels young again:

The comparisons between the 1970s and Watergate and the current events are astounding. Both periods have presidents that ignore the rule of law and are out for their own self-interest. At the beginning of both periods, the press interviews seem to be filled with Republican apologists.

As the country moves through the next year or so, it will be very interesting if the majority of Republicans come around on the side of supporting good government as they did in the 70s.

Follow the link for the rest.

Share

Science, Schmience 0

Mike comments on Scott Pruitt’s war on science at the EPA and points out the the doublespeak is strong in Pruitt (warning: Mike gets somewhat heated).

William D. Ruckelshaus, ex-EPA administrator, has more.

Share

Courting Disaster 0

Share

The Toll of Trumpled Truth 0

At Der Spiegel, Roger Cohen mediates on the dangers of Trumpery. A snippet:

Yet, he is dangerous. Trump has already blurred the line between truth and falsehood. He has attacked the judiciary and a free press. I had an alarming experience recently. Trump had lied, as he routinely does, about two phone calls, one from the president of Mexico and one from the head of the Boy Scouts. The calls, supposedly to congratulate him, did not exist. They were pure inventions. Asked if Trump had lied, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said, “I wouldn’t say it was a lie.”

I actually remember shrugging. And it was the shrug that was terrifying. This is how autocrats – or would-be autocrats – cement their power. They wear you down. They take you down the rabbit hole. They want you to hear the great leader declare that 2+2=5 – and shrug.

Share

A Step Forward 0

Title:  All the President's Men.  Image:  Foot setting down taking a step with an ankle bracelet in place.

Click for the original image.

Share

“. . . and Provide for the General Welfare.” 0

Shorter Badtux: “Yeah. Right.’

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.