From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

Tin-Pot Trumpery 0

We are doomed.

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

Andres Oppenheimer notes a contrast:

It works like this: When a foreign-born terrorist kills eight people, the president demands stricter immigration controls. But when a U.S.-born gunman kills 58 people, as happened a month ago in Las Vegas, Trump does not utter a word about the need for stricter gun laws.

Follow the link for the complete article.

Share

Rule of Lawless, One More Time 0

Peter Baker takes a look at Donald Trump’s recent belittling of law enforcement. The whole article is worth a read, but I think the introduction sums up the key bit (emphasis added):

One of President Donald Trump’s biggest disappointments in office, by his own account, was discovering that he is not supposed to personally direct law enforcement decisions by the Justice Department and the FBI. So, instead, he has made himself into perhaps the most vocal critic of America’s system of justice ever to occupy the Oval Office.

In other words, he’s mad because he can’t get his way.

Follow the link to see why I said that.

Share

Brazile Nuts? 0

Josh Marshall tries to figure out just what Donna Brazile is hoping to accomplish with her recent revelations, which are not, in fact, revelations, that Hillary Clinton’s campaign has a fund-raising agreement with the DNC, as too did the Sanders campaign.

Here’s a nugget:

As I wrote above, it’s not clear to me that the description of the joint fundraising agreement is accurate. Even if it is, accurate, “rigged” is a highly, highly loaded word. It slices into the heart of the divisions currently tearing at the Democratic party. But we watched the 2016 primaries unfold in real time. What did the DNC do to rig the primaries? We hear a lot about scheduling primary debates on Saturdays. But c’mon. If primary debate scheduling – which was eventually tossed aside in any case – was enough to defeat Sanders that’s a pretty sad commentary. Clinton was the establishment candidate. It’s no secret that Wasserman-Schultz favored Clinton over Sanders. The party’s establishment and apparatus were more supportive of her. We know that. That’s what it means to be the ‘establishment candidate’. But did she or the DNC do things that made it impossible for Sanders to win or even made it any harder for him to win? I see no evidence of that.

Share

“The Three Tyrannies” 0

Share

The Court Is in Sessions 0

Share

Promises, Promises 0

Man says,


Click for a larger image.

Share

Bubble, Bubble, Toil and Trouble 0

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm 0

El Reg reports on Facebook’s promise to clean up its bots. It reports in passing on an earlier case of fakery and what it tells us about Facebook and “social” media.

It’s a significant shift for a platform business, where both the legal liability framework and the economics incentivise Facebook to do as little as possible. The entire premise is based on using algorithms to avoid human labour (and human judgement).

It’s five years since the BBC’s Rory Cellan-Jones set up a fake business on Facebook and gained thousands of “likes” and clicks, many of which were, er, from fake accounts too. Facebook didn’t seem to care. It was all “engagement”, which justified its advertising model.

(snip)

Also recall that when Facebook introduced its controversial “Trending Topics” in 2014, it used teams of lowly paid human “curators”. Last spring it fired almost all of them, choosing to rely instead on algorithms. That decision, allied to Facebook’s incentives which rewarded clicks, meant that Trending Topics became a cesspool of spurious material.

Share

It Wasn’t “Gone with the Wind.” It Was Never There. 2

Will Bunch deconstructs John Kelly’s misguided and historically–what’s a stronger word than “false”? Oh, yeah, complete and utter bullshit–claim that the Civil War resulted from a “failure to compromise.”

Indeed, it resulted from a refusal–the South’s refusal–to compromise.

Here’s a bit from Bunch’s article (follow the link for the rest).

There’s two very important things to unpack here. The first is that this wrong-headed, fundamentally dishonest and arguably dangerous version of American history — coming from the top aide to the 45th president of the United States — cannot be allowed to stand unchallenged.

The Civil War was not the result of “a lack of an ability to compromise,” but because 11 American states were determined to fight — to the death, if necessary — to defend a way of life in which an oligarchy of plantation owners became wealthy by enslaving human beings, based upon the color of the skin.

Kelly’s statement reflects what I have pointed out before–that the North may have won the war, but the South won the peace, weaponizing racism and propagating propaganda about a “land of gracious living” peopled by “Southern gentlemen and Southern belles” that never existed except in Gone with the Wind and other pieces of preposterous puffery, while papering over the violence and brutality that created for those “Southern mansions.”

That propaganda has penetrated the nation’s soul and perverted white Americans’ view of themselves, of their virtues and faults, and of their fellow citizens and residents.

Seeing the effects is easy.

You just have to open your eyes.

Share

“A Choice, Not an Echo” 0

Dick Polman observes that the Republican Party faces a choice. A snippet:

Now that Trump sleuth Robert Mueller has served up two accused criminals and one confessed criminal — with the likelihood of many more in the months to come — Republicans have reached an historic reckoning. They must choose which fork to take. They must decide whether to do their jobs, in the name of democracy and accountability, or to become cheerleaders for authoritarianism.

They must choose, in the words of ex-Republican foreign policy adviser Max Boot, “whether they are loyal to the rule of law or the rule of Trump.”

I must confess that I am not confident that today’s Republican Party is capable of making the correct choice.

Share

How Stuff Works, “Social” Media Dept. 0

Title:  The Social Media Fall Run for Gullibility Awareness.  Image:  Race course with banner saying,

Share

Believe It! or Don’t 0

Sarah Huckabee Sanders in front of White House saying, Click for the original image.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

Dick Polman explores why Trump’s dupes, symps, and fellow-travelers couldn’t care less about indictments or law-breaking.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

To paraphrase the classic Warner Brothers cartoon, “They are gremlins, from the Kremlin.”

Share

The Eye of the Beholder 0

Frame One:  Man looking at television news of Trump scandals, saying,

Click for the original image.

Share

Misdirection Play, Twits on Twitter Dept. 0

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Spin city.

Share

Their Money’s Worth 0

Terrorist saying,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Timid Woodland Creatures 0

GOP Elephant in the Magic Forest meeting Alice, the Tin Man, and the Scarecrow.  Elephant says,

Click for the original image.

If you are not able to view the image, I think it’s safe to day that gocomics.com is having issues tonight.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.