From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

Forward into the Past! 0

Der Spiegel’s Holger Stark takes a long and complex look at the forces that fed Trumpery. Here’s a nugget.

The America of today has lost faith in its own superiority. It has become a regressive country that is turning its back on the world. If you leave Washington, D.C., behind and travel through the country, from Alabama to Alaska, you will find that the American Dream has been lost. The country is no longer proudly leading the way.

With his diabolical instinct for the country’s political mood, Trump captured this shift on campaign evenings like the one in Burlington, distilling it to a single maxim that warmed the hearts of many in the United States: “America First.”

The article is well worth the ten minutes you will spend reading it.

Share

A Dutch Treat 0

Via Balloon Juice.

Afterthought:

I suspect that this is not atypical of international perception of the Trumpling of America, he said in a convoluted manner.

Share

NDA 0

Non-Disclosure Agreements are common in business, so as to protect proprietary information. I once had to sign one, even though I was a very small fry, promising not to disclose any of my employer’s secrets about their patented and copyrighted products.

Government is different, as, at least in theory, government employees work for the people, not for a private person. In contrast, Donald Trump reportedly had many of his campaign officials sign MDAs and may even have demanded that government employees do so, as he seems to be approaching his new job (this is just my own opinion, now) as if he had been elected God Emperor of Dune or something.

The Office of Special Counsel, an agency that protects whistleblowers in the federal government, on Wednesday issued a reminder that any non-disclosure agreements or policies on employee communications must include language notifying federal employees of their whistleblower rights.

“Under the anti-gag provision, agencies cannot impose nondisclosure agreements and policies that fail to include required language that informs employees that their statutory right to blow the whistle supersedes the terms and conditions of the nondisclosure agreement or policy,” the OSC press release said.

Frankly, I consider it highly unlikely that he will pay any heed to this at all.

More at the link.

Share

The Mechanics of Mendacity 0

Share

A Modest Proposal 0

Daniel Ruth offers a plan for a cease-fire in the White House War on Facts. Here’s a bit:

The solution is obvious. Give the president and his team all the fake news they want.

Really now, how hard would it be for the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and USA Today to print a few hundred special copies every day solely to be delivered to the White House and filled with glowing, cooked-up stories and editorials extolling the brilliance, the vision and the magnificence of the Trump administration?

Imagine all of the stories in tribute to the Caesar of the West Wing. All of Trump’s favorite sports teams would always win. Every policy would be a stroke of pure genius. And everywhere the president went it would always be 80 degrees and sunny. And while you may think the Trumps are the first family to move into the White House in quite some time without a pet dog, you can’t deny that unicorn grazing on the South Lawn is a thing of beauty.

Share

Carolina Muting 0

News item:

After video posted on Facebook Friday showed a group of people in Washington, D.C. shouting at former North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R), a GOP state legislator introduced legislation to make shouting at a former state official a crime.

Words fail me, but a picture is worth:

Picture showing three doors:   Men's, Women's, and Changing Station.  Changing Station is labeled

Share

“25th Amendment Solutions” 0

Dick Polman goes there.

And it’s not even been a full week yet.

Share

Behind Closed Doors 0

Trump to Federal Government: Stifle it.

This does not bode well.

Share

Press Conference 0

Trump press secretary reading list of


Click for the original image.

Tony Norman has more. Here’s a snippet from his article:

Just as Orwell warned us, contempt for objective truth encourages a dependence on euphemisms. This, in turn, debases all political discourse. Still, the brazenness of Ms. Conway’s appeal to “alternative facts” was breathtaking in its utter capitulation to cynicism. It enraged every journalist who heard it and it should’ve enraged every citizen, too, but most Americans are too busy going about their lives to give much thought to the lies of the president’s spokespeople.

This indifference is what the Trump administration is counting on. The multiple daily outrages via Twitter, or at a White House briefing, or in a dark presidential speech or uttered on a Sunday talk show will quickly consume the public’s finite allotment of outrage. This can only lead to more indifference and a glassy-eyed boredom that will not serve us well when long-term assaults against every one of our democratic institutions begin in earnest.

Share

Decoding de Code 0

Jared Bernstein offers some pointers on understanding what Donald Trump says. A snippet:

I don’t believe a word he says, and neither should you.

Follow the link to read his reasoning.

Share

The Mencken of the Election 0

Fred Hobson, a retired professor, draws on the sayings of H. L. Mencken to shed light on Donald Trump’s appeal. I don’t know to what extent I agree with him, but it’s an interesting, if cynical (as was Mencken) take and worth a read. A snippet:

What Mencken had in mind was his belief that most Americans were driven by an envy of those who have more education, more social status, more cultivation, a more encompassing world view (though, curiously, not necessarily more money).

(snip)

. . . to bring it back to 2016, most Trump supporters detested The New York Times and the mainstream press, as well as academics or experts of any sort, including scientists who had a fact-based belief in evolution and climate change – which is to say, any of those who presumed to have the answers. Some of their resentment was justified, as they detected the disdain and condescension with which “experts” viewed small-town values and “flyover country.” But it went beyond that. To all too many Trump followers, truth itself was questioned. It was more comforting to rely on Trump’s version of it.

Share

The Uncertainty Principle 0

The Bangor Daily News editorial board shares a theory.

Share

A Rank Regime 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Robert Fuller suggest a new “ism” (emphasis added):

The abuse of rank, however, is invariably an affront to human dignity. Rankism stifles initiative, taxes productivity, harms health, and stokes revenge. By giving rankism a face—his own scowling, mocking face—President Trump has unmasked it.

Once you have a name for it, you realize that rankism is everywhere in plain sight. Bullying, belittling, derision, corruption, harassment, and self-aggrandizement—these are all manifestations of rankism. The sooner we pin a generic name on them, the sooner we’ll be able to show them all the door.

Share

Know-Nothings Redux 0

Gina Barreca worries about the incoming administration’s embrace of ignorance as a worldview. A snippet:

Look, I’m not worried about whether people in the new administration will have a piece of paper issued by an Ivy League institution or not. I’m worried about the carefully groomed and artfully constructed celebration of ignorance I regard as part of Donald Trump’s administration. In my old Brooklyn neighborhood, there used to be a joke saying, “If you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?” but now we should be asking “If you’re so rich, why aren’t you smart?”

Being articulate, capable of logical reasoning and able to use language constructively is not an affectation. Using your language clearly and effectively is not showing off. Life is not a game of “Scrabble” where you’re awarded points for big words, but language is how we communicate.

Share

Barefoot and Pregnant 0

As Diane Carman points out, this is all about power (more at the link):

Regardless of the self-serving interpretations of morality, economics and public policy that men have put forth for curtailing reproductive rights over the decades, the real motive has been and still is about something straightforward and profoundly cynical.

Power.

Share

A. In an Alternative Universe 0

Q. Where do you find “alternative facts“?

Share

Narcissism Notes 0

When it comes to picking a fight over verifiable facts,* just where does one draw the line between silly and stupid?

Inquiring minds want to know.

________________

*All facts are verifiable. That’s what makes them “facts.”

Share

Lies and Lying Liars 0

The Charlotte Observer skewers the non-apology apology of a Republican operative who authored a “fake news” story.

The San Francisco Chronicle has more on this particular faker.

(What’s unusual about this is that the faker got his comeuppance. Wonder if he’ll get picked up by Fox News?)

Share

Stray Thought 0

There is bittersweet pleasure (but no comfort) in watching “conservative” opinion writers, who have made careers of justifying Republicans and Republicanism, express dismay at what they have helped create.

For example. And example.

And that’s just from this morning’s casual reading . . . .

Share

The Vetting 0

Senate Committee seeking testimony from Mr. Fox:  Tell us, Mr. Fox, what are your qualifications to be Secretary of Henhouses?

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.