From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

“The Stand” 0

Image:  The Republican Platform Heathcare:  Just die. Economic Recovery:  More tax cuts for the wealthy. Jobs:  Low pay/Part time/No benefits. Women's Rights:  Back to the 50's. Civil Rights:  Back to the 50's. Gay Rights:  Back to the 50's. Social Security:  Give it to Wall Street. Energy:  Frack, Baby, Frack. Environment:  Destroy it one well at a time. National Debt:  Cut programs, buy more weapons. Wall Street Reform:  The banks own everything. The American Dream:  Unending debt.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

ISIS, Origins Issue 0

Thom explains how ISIS arose from the Neoliberal paradise resulting from President George the Worst’s Great and Glorious Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq.

Share

Civil Rights Movement, Act Two 0

At the Ashland, Oregon, Daily Tidings, Herb Rothschild posits that we are seeing a second Civil Rights Movement. Whereas the first was directed at legally-enforced discrimination (Jim Crow laws, segregated public institutions, red-lining neighborhoods and the like), this one is directed at gaining social equality, that is, equality in deed, not just in word.*

Just as the first Civil Rights Movement engendered opposition, so too has this one, as the Republican Party has become little more than the Party of the New Secesh. An excerpt:

Image of Trump supporters displaying Confederate battle ensign with This year is shaping up to be for the second struggle what 1964-1965 was for the first. On one side, Republican officials at every level have been openly combative since a black person was elected president. Now their George Wallace has emerged, and this time they’ve embraced him. Hate speech and hate crimes are increasing. In April the Southern Poverty Law Center published research indicating the Trump campaign is inflaming racial and ethnic tensions in U.S. classrooms nationwide. On the other side, graphic exposure by phone cameras has made routine police violence against people of color no longer tolerable and sparked renewed grassroots activism.

Do please read the rest.

Image via Michael-in-Norfolk.
__________________

*The actual extent to which “equality in word,” as opposed to “equality in deed,” has been achieved, of course, is arguable and has been spotty, at best.

It is not just chance that, until the rise of Donald Trump, though, racists have been restricted to speaking in code since the 1970s. Now they’ve dropped the codes as they rally for racism.

Share

Jacked Pot 0

Two men on bench, one, labeled


Click for the original image.

Share

Slants on the News 0

Daniel Ruth marvels at the unfairness of the news coverage of Donald Trump. A bit:

Obviously, when Trump obliquely suggested someone should shoot Hillary Clinton, or claimed President Barack Obama is a founder of ISIS, or belittled Sen. John McCain’s years as a prisoner of war, we ungrateful slugs in the “Manchurian Candidate” media should have written something along the lines of: “Donald Trump is the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.”

Share

“All the Buzz” 0

Image of Congressman talking to reporter as giant mosquito looms through the window.  Reporter asks,


Click for the original image.

Share

The Art of the Troll 0

At The Guardian, David Sax makes a convincing argument that Donald Trump is trolling the electorate. A nugget:

Trump’s trolling is a high-impact, low-output strategy. A single tweet or comment can generate days worth of free publicity, and keep him the central character in the race. Like all skilled trolls, Trump has proven masterful at inspiring his followers to do the bulk of his dirty work. According to West (Jessamyn West, veteran of communitizing the community–ed.), the best trolls enter a conversation, make a comment or two, set off a fight, and step back as other trolls emerge to sling punches. Trolls aren’t warriors, they’reJessamyn instigators. They know how to imply something racist, hateful or misogynistic, blowing rhetorical dog whistles that bring out more blatantly offensive supporters while allowing themselves deniability. “There’s an art to this,” West says. “It’s like a flaming bag of dog shit on someone’s doorstep.” Even if you know who likely put it there, it’s not like you can dust it for prints.

Elsewhere, Christopher J. Richter considers how Trump’s experience on “reality” television has molded his behavior.

Share

Long-Term Goals? 0

Thom and Jared Yates Sexton wonder whether Trump is looking beyond the campaign to a media venture, sort of like this:

Roger Ailes + David Duke = TrumpTV

I don’t buy it.

I don’t think that Trump is capable of “plans,” at least not as most of us understand the term.

If he were, he’d not have left a trail of broken dreams and failed businesses.

Share

Vanity, Vanity, All Is Vanity 0

My take is simpler. Jill Stein is nuts.

Share

“Regrets, I’ve Had a Few . . . .” 0

Dick Polman notes that Donald Trump has recently contradicted himself and claims to have “regrets.” Mr. Polman wonder just what exactly Trump regrets. To help make the choice easier, he compiles a partial list:

What, exactly, does he supposedly regret? Does he regret insulting the Khans? Insulting Carly Fiorina’s face? Insinuating that Megyn Kelly was menstruating? Accusing Ted Cruz’s father of helping to plot the JFK hit? Retweeting an attack on Heidi Cruz’s looks? Retweeting junk crime stats from a white supremacist group? Mimicking the physical disability of a New York Times reporter? Promising to raise big bucks for vets, then chiseling them? Mocking John McCain’s POW stint? Smearing the media (just a few days ago) as “the lowest form of life?” Comparing Ben Carson to a child molester? Calling Harrisburg, Pennsylvania “a war zone?” Insisting that he’ll lose Pennsylvania only if “certain areas” (code for black people) rig the returns? Inviting Russia to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails? Calling Mexican immigrants rapists? Suggesting that “second amendment people” could take Hillary out? Claiming that she and Obama “founded ISIS?” Voicing his desire to punch a protestor in the face? Attacking the credentials of a “Mexican” judge who was born and raised in Indiana?

Share

Spot the Loser 0

Donald Trump says,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

True Confessions 0

Jim Jenkins tells all:

I have the most seniority as a member of the Left Wing Media Conspiracy, the one now conniving to take down the would-be presidency of Donald John Trump by, well, reporting what he says on the campaign stump.

Follow the link for the jarring revelations.

Share

The Privatization Scam 0

Some good news:

The Obama administration said on Thursday that it planned to end the federal government’s use of private prisons, after an inquiry found they were drastically more unsafe than publicly run facilities.

Deputy attorney general Sally Yates announced the decision in a memo to Thomas Kane, the acting director of the federal prisons bureau, which was published on the justice department’s website.

(snip)

Yates said in her memo that research had found private prisons “simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs, and resources” and “do not save substantially on costs” either. Essential government education and training programs for prisoners “have proved difficult to replicate and outsource” in the private sector, she said.

Share

The Conscience of a Conservative 0

The Republican Heritage
So, you want to be a CONSERVATIVE?
1)  When Conservatives had a choice between tax breaks for the richest 1% of Americans or the middle class, they chose the super rich.
2)  When Conservatives had a choice between tax breaks for the super rich and body armor for American troops dying in Iraq, they chose tax breaks.
3)  when Conservatives had a choice between tax breaks for the super rich or funding the National Institutes for Health, they chose tax breaks.
4)  Every time working people have asked for a raise in the minimum wage, Conservatives have opposed it, saying wealthy businesses can't afford it--even as they gave giant bonuses to Wall Street CEOs.4
5)  When scientists found research on step cells could help people with Alzhiemer's or quadriplegia overcome their illnesses, Conservatives killed it, saying God was against it.
6)  When Congress proposed a national holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King, Conservatives opposed it, calling King a Communist on the floor of the Senate.
7)  When WWI veterans who had lost limbs adked for wheelchair accessible sidewalks and buildings, Conservatives opposed it, saying it was too expensive.
8)  When Franklin Roosevelt tried to create a safety net for senior citizens, Conservative opposed it, saying it was too expensive, and have been trying to dismantle it ever since.
9)  When Bill Clinton proposed a law that would allow new mothers to take three months of unpaid leave from a job, Conservatives opposed it.
10)  When Conservatives found half the people going bankrupt every year were doing so after a catastrophic illness that wiped out their life savings, Conservatives changed the law to it impossible for them to file for bankruptcy.
11)  When oil company profits skyrocketed beyond previous heights, Conservatives passed a multimillion dollar taxpayer giveaway for all companies to keep up the good work.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

“Extreme Vetting,” Redux 0

Share

Once More into the Breach 0

If you want a sane discussion of the DNC email leaks and similar hacks by persons who

  • know how email and networks work,
  • are not grinding political axes, and
  • can explain stuff good,

listen to the latest episode of The Sunday Morning Linux Review.

Share

Never What It Said It Was 0

Francis Wilkinson points out that Teabaggery has never been about what it claims to be about.

It is not a tax revolt; it is a tax grab.

A snippet (emphasis added):

There is a long tradition of supporting state spending on yourself (hands off my Medicare) while opposing the allocation of tax dollars to someone else (Obamacare is tyranny). The Tea Party covered this mundane transaction in a powdered wig.

Until Donald Trump came along.

Trump, whose genuine populist instincts appear unconscious of, and unencumbered by, American history, dispensed with the tri-corner hats. His offer required no validation from neo-colonials, no resort to hallowed principles of limited government. Trump’s deal was straight up: He would secure the government programs — Social Security, Medicare — that benefit older, whiter Tea Party voters while chasing younger, browner Americans away from the public trough. He would even clear out of the country anyone who failed to prove citizenship.

More at the link.

Share

“Extreme Vetting” 0

PoliticalProf offers a preview of Donald Trump’s “extreme vetting” of immigrants.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Share

When the Truth Hurts 0

Donald Trump looks at row of newspaper boxes in which every newspaper accurately quotes something he said.  Trump says,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.