From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

Republican Family Values 0

Grieving woman stands next to gravestone reading,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

“Totally Unfit for Office” 0

Steve Anderson, retired brigadier general, explains why so many generals and national security professionals think reelecting Donald Trump would be a national security disaster.

Via C&L, which has commentary.

Share

Both Sides Don’t 0

Steve M. is fed up with the press’s bothsiderism. He notes that the press seems reluctant? incapable? too wedded to the horse race? to identify the instigators. Indeed, he sees a pattern (emphasis in the original):

The truth is always the same: partisans on one side, partisans who are also angry intimidators on the other side.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

(Broken link fixed.)

Share

No, I Will Not Be Watching the Debate, Reprise (Updated) 0

My friend watched some to the debate while I was watching Inspector Frost.

Based on her reaction to the behavior of one of the participants (you know which one–the one of which she said, “I can’t believe they allowed him to be on that stage”), all I can say is, well, I called that.

Addendum:

An early fact-check from Scripps News.

Facts may not lie, but Donald Trump most assuredly does.

Share

No, I Will Not Be Watching the Debate 0

Whatever happens on the debate stage cannot affect my vote, while subjecting myself to political theatrics and demented right-wing ramblings (you know to whom I refer) will likely serve only to increase my stress level, which is high enough already.

Rather, I will likely watch an episode of A Touch of Frost on Tubi. And you should too.

Share

Foxy Shady 0

David discusses Fox News’s banc-and-forth about the behavior of RFK Jr. and what it tells us about Fox News’s integrity. (Warning: short commercial at the end.)

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Schoolboy carrying an assault rifle and a book.  Republican Elephant stops him and sternly says,

Click for the original image.

Share

“But It’s the Only Possible Explanation” 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Joe Pierre notes that “For politicians–especially those with authoritarian tendencies–conspiracy theories can serve as propaganda that exploits the psychological needs of a voting populace.” He goes on to list six of the ways that conspiracy theories can sway dis coarse discourse:

  • To malign opponents
  • To sow mistrust in authoritative sources of information
  • To deflect blame
  • To create “us and them” narratives
  • To portray oneself as a victim or an anti-establishment candidate
  • To incite or justify violence

Follow the link for a detailed discussion of each of these items and ask yourself if any of them sound something in today’s news.

Share

Spin City 0

Frame One:  Once again, it's time to see the world as Trump voters see it, with your ever helpful MAGA Goggles!  Frame Two, captioned

Click to view the original image.

Share

“The Horsemen of the Rightwing Apocalypse” 0

Emma talks with Rena Steinzor, research professor of law at the University of Maryland, about her recent book American Apocalypse: The Six Far-Right Groups Waging War on Democracy.

Share

The Disinformation Superhighway 0

At Psychology Today blogs, Tahir Rahman takes a deep dive into how “social” media can lead persons to believe stuff that isn’t. A snippet:

Consider how social media amplifies beliefs. When a post garners thousands of likes or shares, it starts to feel validated: If so many people agree, it must be true, right? But if, for example, thousands of people believe that COVID-19 vaccination is dangerous, how could that be wrong? And yet, we know it is. This effect is even more substantial when the information comes from someone we trust: a public figure, a family member, a friend, or a mentor. The belief gains traction, embedding itself into our mental framework, and before long, it’s not just an idea; it’s a cause worth defending.

Given the flood of falsehoods polluting our polity, I commend his article to your attention.

Share

All the News that Fits 0

Driftglass decodes de code.

Share

The Endorsement 0

Man look at newspaper with headlines,

Click to view the original image.

Afterthought:

Does this mean that Dick Cheney is now a RINO?

Share

All the News that Fits 0

Cartoon lampooning

Click to view the original image.

Share

The Answer Is No 0

The question.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Man and woman marooned on a desert island next to a sign reading

Click to view the original image.

Share

All the News that Fits 0

Dick Polman looks at the recent coverage of Donald Trump’s public appearances and asks a (rhetorical) question:

Why does the mainstream media (The Times is the most prominent practitioner) keep laundering Trump’s insanity and incoherence?

Follow the link for his answer.

Share

News of the Weird 0

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Apparently, suffer the children (and the parents and the grandparents) is a Republican Family Value.

Share

Misdirected Play 0

At The Colorado Sun, Mike Littwin notes that, in their recent interview, Dana Bash asked Kamala Harris about Donald Trump’s racist attacks on her, to which Harris responded, “Same old tired playbook. Next question, please.” .

Littwin goes on to argue that the question was directed to the wrong person:

I hope he (Trump–ed.) gets asked about his racism and misogyny at the Sept. 10 presidential debate. It’s Trump who should have to answer these questions, not Harris. It’s the racist who should be called out.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.