From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

The Privatization Scam 0

Arizona’s state budget is in big trouble because of the privatization scam. That’s something you can voucher on.

Here’s a bit of the report from ProPublica:

Advocates for Arizona’s universal voucher initiative had originally said that it wouldn’t cost the public — and might even save taxpayers money. The Goldwater Institute, a conservative think tank that helped craft the state’s 2022 voucher bill, claimed in its promotional materials at the time that the vouchers would “save taxpayers thousands per student, millions statewide.” Families that received the new cash, the institute said, would be educating their kids “for less than it would cost taxpayers if they were in the public school system.”

But as it turns out, the parents most likely to apply for these vouchers are the ones who were already sending their kids to private school or homeschooling. They use the dollars to subsidize what they were already paying for.

Much more at the link.

Share

Trumpnado 0

Two sharks sitting in easy chairs, one on a cell phone and the other reading

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

“There Is No Auto-Pilot Setting for Democracy” 0

Seth points out that previous generations have had to fight to protect democracy and that, now, it’s our turn. He notes that what we don’t need are the “opportunistic purveyors of paranois, suspicion, and fear, who have already rushed to fill the void with incendiary conspiracy theories and lies.”

Aside:

I got three texts purporting to be from J. D. Vance yestoday. (Why he would text me, I have no idea, but, each time, I blocked the number.)

Each one addressed me as “Patriot.”

Coming from the likes of him, that word becomes an insult.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Myth Buster 0

In the course of a longer article how, in evaluating candidates for office, we need to look at the big picture when evaluating candidates for office, the Portland Press-Herald’s Victoria Hugo-Vidal makes a trenchant observation (emphasis added):

It’s a common misconception that Republicans want a smaller government. The party does not. Republicans may want smaller government for themselves and their various rich donors, but they want a bigger government to use as a hammer against Americans who aren’t living the way they want them to.

Follow the link for context.

Share

A Moment of Reflection 0

Newswoman:  Our top story this hour--the shocking attempt on the former president's life.  Newsman:  Americans everywhere are asking--how could this specific instance of violence have occurred in our deeply violent society.  Newswoman:  Has a country where people wonder every day if their children will get caught in a school shooting finally lost its innocence?  Newsman:  Our correspondent Betty McBettie is on the scene.  (Switch to Betty McBettie interviewing MAGA-hatted man.)  Betty McBettie:  Does this vicious attack make you reconsider the Republican Party's support for unrestricted gun ownership?  MAGA-hatted Man:  Good Lord, no.  What kind of question is that?  Obviously the only appropriate response is thoughts and prayers.  Anyway, this was the media's fault.  I despise you with the fire of a thousand suns.  I can't wait until Trump wins and executes you all for treason.  Betty McBettie:  I see.  Well, thank you for your fascination perspective.  (Back to the station.)  Newsman:  Thanks, Betty.  Coming up next, do both sides have a problem with violent rhetoric?  We'll see what Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert think.  Newswoman:  Also, a special report on Joe Biden being old, just because.  Newsman:  First, these messages.

Click to view the original image.

Share

“History Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes”* 0

Now it is Darryl Cornelius in the Law Vegas Sun who hears a rhyme.

________________

*Mark Twain.

Share

Waiting for Old Number 2025 0

Title:  The Republican Platform.  Image:  Uncle Sam stands on train station labeled

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Immunity Impunity 0

Get out of Jail free cardDer Spiegel talks with Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe about the Supreme Supremacist Court’s recent decision granting Donald Trump “presidential immunity” for “official acts.” Professor Tribe finds the decision to be–er–of questionable legitimacy.

It is a timely and disturbing read. Here’s a tiny bit of it (emphasis in the original):

DER SPIEGEL: Your Harvard colleagues Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, authors of the book “How Democracies Die,” doubt the democratic legitimacy of the Supreme Court. They see it as dominated by the Republican Party, which has won the popular vote only once in the past 30 years but has appointed six of the nine judges to the Supreme Court. Levitsky and Ziblatt speak of a “tyranny of the minority.”

Tribe: My colleagues in the government department are exactly right. It is a dangerous phenomenon. Minorities are entitled to protection in every respect. But no minority should be able to run roughshod over the majority. After all, it is not a minority of the oppressed that has gained such power in our system. It is the minority of those with the greatest wealth and the best connections. And they are now running the show in a way that is very dangerous to our democracy.

Share

The Know-Nothing 0

Donald Trump holding a bomb labeled

Click to view the original image.

Share

“Corruption without Consequence” 0

Sam and the crew discuss AOC’s speech about abuse of power by Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and the rest of today’s Supreme Supremacist Court.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Mangy comments on the Youtube page:

Nobody does ‘snowflake’ quite as well as Donald Trump. There is no issue out there in which Trump can’t figure out a way to paint himself as the victim. Women’s rights? Trump’s suffered because of it. Global warming? Trump’s unjustly victimized by talk of it. Gay rights? Trump’s chances for success are hindered by it. The metric system? Trump says it was designed to make him look fat. Gravity? Just a theory meant to keep Trump down. With all the melting down that Trump does, Mangy Fetlocks thought he deserved a song.

Share

The Vow 0

Donald Trump being sworn in for his second term.  Trump, his left hand on the Bible and his right hand raised in the air, says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

The Courage of His Conniptions 0

Methinks this sets some kind of new record for weasel-wording.

Share

The Wannabe 0

Donald Trump says,

Click for the original image.

Share

Dog Gone It 0

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Steve M. notes a disparity in the press coverage, which leads him to remark upon what he argues is a longstanding trend. I’m not sure I agree with all his conclusions, but, given that today’s reportage is sweating bullets over Biden’s being three years older than Trump while ignoring (or, at least, de-emphasizing) Trump’s raving falsehoods and fantastic fabrications, methinks his piece is worth a read.

Here’s a bit of his article:

But even if you believe that Trump’s brain is full of failing neurons rather than right-wing disinformation, it’s hard to believe that the media has a categorical bias toward portraying major-party candidates as coherent. If that were the case, we wouldn’t have had months of stories in the media questioning the mental fitness of Joe Biden.

What we have instead is a bias toward normalizing Republicans, a process that’s usually accompanied by an “othering” of Democrats. This has been going on for decades: Walter Mondale was a gloomy wimp, Michael Dukakis was an effete Ivy League weirdo, Al Gore was a prissy egghead, Hillary Clinton was a cackling ballbuster. Their opponents were Real Americans, fond of country music, pickup trucks, and plain-spoken common sense.

Share

“When People Show You Who They Are, Believe Them the First Time”* 0

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Gene Collier takes a close look at the implications of the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. He finds it–er–less than attractive.

Indeed, he characterizes it as a “MAGA Manifesto.”

Follow the first link for 900 pages of secessionist propaganda said project.

Follow the second to learn why Collier sees it as a “MAGA Manifesto.”

Aside:

I not exactly sure what heritage the “Heritage” Foundation is celebrating, but it sounds not unlike the legacy of one of my late relatives.
_____________

*Maya Angelou.

Share

Misinformation Multiplication 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Robert N. McCauley takes a look at a recent book by Paul Thagard, Falsehoods Fly: Why Misinformation Spreads and How to Stop It. I commend his piece to your attention, especially now, when one can spout unsourced anything. A snippet (emphasis added):

Making stuff up often works because, as Thagard notes, people tend to believe what they are told unless something is clearly untoward either about the statement itself or about the person making it. Since, currently, so many get so much of their information from social media, people typically haven’t a clue about who originally advanced most of the claims that they encounter. Consequently, just as with hearsay, unless the stuff that people make up is obviously faulty, recipients are unlikely to bring their critical faculties to bear. Thagard observes that one of the less attractive features of the new AI systems is precisely their ability to make things up (known as AI “hallucinations”).

Afterthought:

You can’t “consider the source” when you can’t identify the source.

Share

“A Republic, If You Can Keep It” 0

Title:  The Constitutional Convention of 1787:  A historical reenactment from your friends at the Federalist Society.  Ben Franklin:  Gentlemen, given our mutual feelings regarding the King of England--our clear priority is to create a document which places the president entirely above the law.  Jefferson:  Indeed.  There should be no prosecution of an executive for any action he might perform in an official capacity, which, of course, encompasses anything he might do while in office.  Another Founder:  That seems sensible.  But if everything a president does is legal, what's the point of delineating procedures for impeachment?  Fourth Founder:  Just a little harmless ambiguity--so that our descendants may someday infer our true intent for themselves.  Jefferson:  Won't this lead t many decades of misinterpretation by simple-minded folk who mistakenly believe we did not intend for the president to have the absolute powers of monarchy?  Franklin:  Perhaps, but how sweeter the reward when wiser minds at last prevail?  Also, we need to leave some room in there for a future court to restrict bodily autonomy, voting rights, and intrusive regulations on well-intentioned men of commerce.  And gifts from grateful wealthy citizens should totally be legal.  Fourth Founder:  These are strange words you speak, good sir--but I do not doube the wisdom that underlies them.  Third Founder:  Our fledgling nation is great--and if we have done our work well, perhaps someone will someday make America great again.  Epilogue:  And that's the way it was in 1787, and don't let the lying liberal media tell you any different.

Click to view the original image.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.