The Sporting Life category archive

Via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.

Is there any reputedly “legitimate” endeavor (other than possibly Wall Street banking) more corrupt and venal than big-time college sports?

What’s the ratio between college basketball games on TV today and those worth watching?

Hmmmm. Games worth watching divided by games on TV today.

I can’t remember.

What happens when you divide into zero?

(Follow the link for his answer.)

Bertolt Brecht said

Great sport begins at a point where it has ceased to be healthy.

Perhaps he was talking about big-time football:

A Michigan native who has lived in Philadelphia for two years says he was harassed and beaten unconscious by a group of Eagles fans outside Lincoln Financial Field after the Eagles’ 34-20 victory over the Detroit Lions on Sunday.

Follow the link. The story has, as the folks who want to appear street-wise say, “cred.”

And don’t blame this on Philadelphia. It happens all over. If you must blame anyone, blame the hypesters.

This is big-time sports, the circuses (of the famous “bread and circuses,” but without the bread) for the 99%.

The corruption of big-time football infects everything it touches.

John Affleck searches for something worthwhile in the year in sports and concludes that that, with luck, it might be the realization that “words matter.”

He cites several cases of coaches and players getting into trouble over how they treat others, even though abusive behavior has long been considered routine in sports world. A nugget:

What these examples show is that U.S. sports culture hasn’t caught up to contemporary standards of language and behavior. And the defense that sports is somehow different because you have to be tough and resilient to participate in sports hasn’t gained much traction. Why? Because every working adult in this country has to be tough and resilient to do a good job, even to keep one. Sports is not unique, and shouldn’t get a pass on bad behavior.

Consider this: You’re at your workplace and the boss comes in completely unhinged — frothing, cursing, pounding the desk and disparaging your sexual orientation or gender or race. Is that little tirade going to make you more or less loyal to him or her? Is it going to help you succeed? Is it any more OK if your workplace is a baseball diamond than if it is a discount department store?

At Psychology Today Blogs, Matt Beardmore tries to understand why sports fans get violent. A nugget:

. . . on Opening Day 2011 before a game between the San Francisco Giants and Los Angeles Dodgers. Giants fan Bryan Stow was savagely beaten and suffered brain trauma during an attack by Dodgers fans and just returned home a few months ago.

“Fan violence is really an adult form of bullying,” said Kathy Samoun, who was so moved by the Stow incident – and many others involving fan violence – that she founded the Bay Area-based Fans Against Violence non-profit organization, which “encourages fan safety at professional sporting events through education, discussion and partnerships with like-minded organizations.”

Bob Molinaro yearns for simpler days:

Should I go ahead and cast a Heisman vote for Florida State quarterback Jameis Winston if by Dec. 9, the final day of balloting, we’re still waiting to learn whether Winston will be charged with sexual assault? And if I don’t vote for him before we know anything more, am I presuming his guilt? I liked it better when Heisman selections could be based on stats, TV highlights and Brent Musburger’s gosh-darn hyperbole.

The culture of big-time football, that is, the players, the coaches, the conferences, the leagues, the universities, the owners, the whole ball of wax, but especially the fans who enable and tolerate it.

Another proposal for a sports palace in Virginia Beach has surfaced.

This one claims that, even in the absence of a big league franchise of some sort, the deal would be a money maker and would cost less than the last deal that the local Developer Party tried to sneak through city council.

Lawson declined to provide financing details about the proposed public-private partnership that would be used to build it. He said that information will come out later. He did say in an email it would be “substantially” cheaper.

The previous deal called for the city to put in $241 million, the state $150 million and a private company $35 million. That money included $80 million to be paid to the Kings for relocation. The city and its Economic Development Department spent about $1.2 million on the previous arena plan.

As far as I can see–and the experience of many cities supports this–when developers want the government to pay for their projects, it’s a good sign that the project will not be a money-maker. Rather, the government will end up holding the bag, stranded on base, and saddled with debt for a building that stands empty most of the time.

Support a sports palace on the grounds of civic pride or public service and you may have a legitimate argument–but profit and economic development? That’s a con and a scam.

Addendum, Later That Same Day:

Via PoliticalProf, here’s a for instance.

The NCAA is not only corrupt, willing to sacrifice virtue, fair play, and players to ratings and revenue, it’s also stupid.

Frankly, I’ve always found “cornhole” to be an unfortunate name for a party game.

Now comes the American Cornhole Association.

Daniel Ruth reviews Greg Easterbrook’s The King of Sports: Football’s Impact on America.

Just read the review–you don’t even need to read the book–to join me in my disgust at big-time football.

Sport columnist extraordinaire Bob Molinaro considers the contract the basketball coach at VCU, which is just up the road a piece. A snippet:

For a guaranteed $1.45 million, 20 victories isn’t a lot to ask from a coach, but that helps give some perspective to the lengths VCU will go to discourage Smart from wandering. According to his contract, he can even earn an extra $31,000 for failing to make the NCAA tournament – but winning the NIT. And should the Rams cut down the nets at the Final Four, Smart would be in line for $356,250 in bonuses.

He even gets small incentives based on his players’ graduation rates. Do coaches with graduation clauses in their contracts have to give back money when a player flunks out? That’s probably a silly question.

Big-time college sports (and wannabe big-time college sports factories) have gone of the rails

I’m ambivalent over the movement to get the Washington Redskins to change the name of their team (which, by extension, should extend to the Cleveland Indians and the Atlanta Braves and even to my own alma mater, as well as to many other high school, college, and pro teams), as I used to be a Redskins fan, back in the Jack Kent Cooke days, before the dark days of the incompetent and egomaniacal Dan Snyder.

On the whole, as I consider how Manifest Destiny treated Native Americans as lower life forms to be abused and exterminated, and then later as figures of comic relief in Hollywood oaters, I’m inclined to think, yeah, do it, make at least a gesture of atonement for the genocide.

It will not atone, but it would be a gesture.

One thing, though, I can say quite heartily is that the fuss has brought all sorts of inanity to the surface.

Ponder the football twits.

Whenever I see a headline like this, I think of Desperate Housewives.

Making education a priority:

When all is said and done, changing football coaches at UC Berkeley will wind up costing the school’s athletic program a whopping $16.3 million.

Meanwhile, in the students’ world . . . .