From Pine View Farm

A Tune for the Times, Crypto Con Dept. 0

Share

Grasping at a Broken Straw 0

The Las Vegas Sun editorial board if we can’t get rid of the guns, we have to get rid of the prejudice.

I reckon their hearts are in the right place.

And, in other news, pigs, wings.

Share

Fly the Fiendly Skies 0

They get fiendlier every day.

We are a broken state.

Share

Maskless Marauders 0

Northeastern University runs the COVID numbers and finds that “the median death rate for counties with the strongest Republican leaning was between 40% and 300% higher than the counties that leaned Democrat,” because, to be blunt, (these are my words, not theirs) some persons chose science and some persons chose stupid.

A snippet (emphasis added); follow the link for the rest.

. . . the COVID-19 pandemic is different from past pandemics, he (Professor Mauricio Santillana of Northeastern–ed.) says. Typically, epidemiological models don’t even take into account the political leaning of communities. In this case, Santillana and the rest of the research team set out to document the vital role that political affiliation played in the devastation of the pandemic.

As part of their research, the team created models based on death counts from the country’s 2,000 counties that looked at factors ranging from socioeconomic status to obesity. Even when controlling for every other variable, the team found that political affiliation factored heavily in the death rate.

We are a society of stupid.

Share

“He’s Making a List . . . .” 0

Share

The Peruvian Parallel 0

The editorial board of the Bangor Daily News sees a striking similarity.

Share

The Crypto Con 0

Man sitting by Christmas tree opens present labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

“Reactionary Populism” 0

David decodes de code.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Yet another oxymoronic (emphasis on the “moronic”) “responsible gun owner” allows politeness to become child’s play.

Share

Muskrat Love 0

Hypocrisy much?

“My Team met with @Twitter today,” (Congresswoman Lori–rf.) Trahan wrote Thursday night, in a tweet that’s since gone viral. “They told us that they’re not going to retaliate against independent journalists or researchers who publish criticisms of the platform.

“Less than 12 hours later, multiple technology reporters have been suspended.”

I suspect I’m not the only person who has come to suspect (to put it rather mildly) that Elon Musk doesn’t know what the heck he is doing and also does not understand the concept of accountability, which is not surprising if one has never been held accountable for anything ever.

Afterthought:

Driftglass sees a pattern here.

Share

Twits Own Twitter, Ad Hack Dept. 0

To borrow a term from Bob Cesca, more muskery. From Techdirt, via Above the Law:

That takes us to the new report from Platformer, which makes it clear that Elon’s Twitter is trying to figure out how to increase the amount of money they make per ad, and wants to do that with better targeting of those ads. Of course, right now, that’s… trickier than it might have been at any time in the past. Between EU data protection laws, California’s privacy laws, and other crackdowns on tracking (such as Apple completely kneecapping Meta’s access to private info for ad tracking) it seems that traditionally targeted ads are on the way out.

It appears that Musk’s solution to this is to force people to cough up their private info.

Share

QOTD 0

Kenneth L. Pike:

Nobody is as good as he thinks he is.

Share

Momento Mori 0

For some fool reason (as my mother used to say), I find myself these past few weeks missing my old internet friend Shaun Mullen, maybe because it was three years ago this month that he passed.

We emailed regularly, but we met only once, a meeting I will always remember, dining together in Newark, Delaware, as I was on my way to visit one of my kids in Philadelphia and he happened to be in Newark for some reason of his own.

I am a better person for having known him.

Share

Unwelcome Home 0

Mike DiMauro is taken aback by the outpouring of racism, bigotry, and hatred (in some quarters) in response to the release of Britney Griner. An excerpt from his column:

Instead, we’re left with the amusing irony that the plight of Brittney Griner, whose skin color, sexual orientation and politics repel so many Americans, completely captures the new American fancy of being ill-informed, mean and happy to trade basic human decency for political posturing.

Seriously. Reading the abject hatred tethered to Griner’s rescue — the saving of a human life — made me think of Sen. Howard Baker’s classic question to bagman Tony Ulasewicz during Watergate: “Who thought you up?”

Who thought these people up? Where do they come from? Have they always been here? All I know is they’re helping us lose our humanity one keystroke at a time.

Afterthought:

I quibble with his use of the term, “amusing irony.” Frightening, appalling, disgusting, maybe, but not amusing.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society,” Reprise 0

writing in The Seattle Times, Steve Valandra, an American who has a residence in Portugal, looks at American gunnuttery from afar. An excerpt:

Seeing the U.S. from the outside frames an ugly and shameful truth: Too many Americans have a selfish and deadly desire for guns, particularly those that rapidly fire off multiple rounds within seconds. The fetish is often wrapped in a twisted view of patriotism and a sham of personal safety and defense.

Share

When the Truth Hurts . . . 0

. . . take the truth-tellers to court.

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.