From Pine View Farm

Social Defabricationalization 0

Cap’n Eddie is in a parallel universe . . . .

Title:  A Tale of Two Eddies Continues.  Flo says,

Click for the original image.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Pandemic frolics.

Share

The Privatization Scam 0

The Orlando Sentinel’s Scott Maxwell can voucher that it is–er–questionable.

Share

QOTD 0

Aeschylus:

It is not the oath that makes us believe the man, but the man the oath.

Share

Geeking Out, Seasonal Edition 0

Listening to an episode of the CBS Radio Mystery Theater in Firefox on Ubuntu MATE with the Plasma desktop. The Konsole terminal emulator is open to the left of Firefox. The wallpaper is from my collection.

Screenshot

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Florida Woman . . . 0

. . . decorates for Christmas.

Share

The Other Resistance 0

Frame One:  Man says,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Rand Gestures 0

Rand Paul said it out loud: Republicans don’t want citizens to vote.

Share

Florida Man Men 0

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Politeness is so easy that even a child can do it.

Share

Facebook Frolics, Rule of Lawless Dept. 0

Seditious frolics.

Afterthought:

It is both amazing and appalling that this person and those like her are willing to sacrifice America’s democracy on the altar of Donald Trump.

Share

QOTD 0

Tina Fey:

It is an impressively arrogant move to conclude that just because you don’t like something, it is empirically not good.

Share

Recommended Reading 0

Josephine Tey’s Inspector Grant novels.

I first read these [mumble] years ago in high school. My high school library had two anthologies entitled Three by Tey and Four, Five, and Six by Tey (how they ended up in my high school library I will never know). In looking for something to distract me from current events and being a mystery buff, I remembered them and purchased the six Inspector Grant mysteries.

They are as good as I remembered them to be.

Share

And Now for a Musical Interlude 0

Share

Twits off Twitter? 0

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Cathy O’Neil skewers the Zuckerborg’s argument that it is to big and complex to break up. A snippet (emphasis added). As an aside, I suspect that U. S. Steel, American Sugar, and other trusts busted by Teddy Roosevelt made similar arguments.

So what would happen if, as a result of the antitrust suits filed by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general, a court ordered Facebook to split up, reversing its acquisitions of WhatsApp and Instagram? The company’s lawyers argue that the various businesses have become so inextricably interwoven that a breakup would be extremely difficult, generating costs and chaos that would harm users worldwide. In other words, don’t mess with us, or else.

Really? No doubt, the breakup would be difficult for Facebook’s managers, who rely on data sharing among WhatsApp, Instagram, and Facebook to create the most complete possible profiles of users and then sell their attention to the highest bidder. If the companies were separated, all the investment they’d been making into surveillance and targeting wouldn’t immediately work out as well as they had hoped. For them, the product is the advertising, not the service to users.

Finish reading this post »

Share

Wish List 0

Rat is writing:

Click to view the original image.

Share

An Authority on Authoritarianism 0

Thom and his guest discuss the workings of authorianism.

Share

How Far Will Wells-Fargo 0

Pretty damned far.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.