From Pine View Farm

2016 archive

All That Was Old Is New Again 0

Thom and Richard Eskow discusses similarities between Donald Trump’s cabinet of deplorables and Republican cabinets of the 1920s.

Jen Sorenson has more. Here’s a snippet (emphasis added):

Of course, he’s (Trump–ed.) never been a man known for doing small and humble. So his cabinet, as yet incomplete, is already the richest one ever. Estimates of how loaded it will be are almost meaningless at this point, given that we don’t even know Trump’s true wealth (and will likely never see his tax returns). Still, with more billionaires at the doorstep, estimates of the wealth of his new cabinet members and of the president-elect range from my own guesstimate of about $12 billion up to $35 billion. Though the process is as yet incomplete, this already reflects at least a quadrupling of the wealth represented by Barack Obama’s cabinet.

Trump’s version of a political and financial establishment, just forming, will be bound together by certain behavioral patterns born of relationships among those of similar status, background, social position, legacy connections, and an assumed allegiance to a dogma of self-aggrandizement that overshadows everything else. In the realm of politico-financial power and in Trump’s experience and ideology, the one with the most toys always wins. So it’s hardly a surprise that his money- and power-centric cabinet won’t be focused on public service or patriotism or civic duty, but on the consolidation of corporate and private gain at the expense of the citizenry.

Welcome to the kelptocracy.

Share

Twitter-in-Chief 0

Image:  Trump at desk with smart phone.  Woman is saying to man,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Per the NRA gun marketing association, more guns means more politeness. For example:

The third male, who told News Center 7’s John Bedell he didn’t want to be interviewed on camera, said Justin Mapp, the 19-year-old Xenia man who was shot to death, blurted out a profane insult.

“All of a sudden they were trading blows,” the third male said of Mapp and the accused, Steven Bruce Brown Jr., 31.

The fight lasted only a few minutes, the third male said, and ended when Brown drew a gun “he always carried.”

Brown and Mapp were wrestling over the weapon when a single round was fired, the third male said.

Marvel at how much politeness there could have been if all three had been packing. Why, there might have been a hail of politeness enveloping them all!

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Self-documented frolics.

Share

QOTD 0

Mark Twain:

Why shoudn’t truth be stranger than fiction? Fiction, after all, has to stick to the possibilities.

Share

That Pesky Dialectic of Materialism, It Just Won’t Go Away 0

At the Boston Review, Alex De Waal remembers Karl Polanyi’s The Great Transformation, which was written in 1944 and analyzed the events leading from the Napoleonic Wars to the World Wars from a social and economic perspective. De Waal applies that same analysis to the events since 1945. His conclusions do not give reason for optimism.

The article is long and densely reasoned and so depressing that it’s taken me three days to wade through it. I urge you to read the whole thing, even if it takes you three days . . . .

Here’s just a bit to either whet your appetite or scare you away (emphasis added).

Donald Trump was elected as the mouthpiece for a populist insurgency that humbled the biggest political machine in the United States. But he is also a plutocrat, a scion of the very system against which he mobilized so much anger. And his cabinet is oligarchy incorporated. What most distinguished Trump from Hillary Clinton in his public performance was his candor in admitting that the system is rotten and so is he. Trump was elected because he is deplorable, and proud of it.

(snip)

So now—a winning minority of the electorate having lodged its protest and voted for its own gravedigger—the logic of today’s political economy is laid bare. What then can we take from The Great Transformation to deepen our understanding of our predicament? Polanyi’s central conclusion is that unregulated capitalism promised a “stark Utopia” of great wealth but destroyed the social and material basis of a humane society. Just over a hundred years ago, nineteenth-century Western liberal civilization reached its apogee, which was also the moment at which it could no longer contain the forces of disorder that it had unleashed. The massive destruction of the world wars, the communist revolution, fascist imperialism, and the Great Depression followed. Capitalism was reprieved by the political dispensation that followed World War II. John Maynard Keynes provided the intellectual capital for managing the market, and the victors of the war recognized that full employment, social welfare, and a good measure of equality were necessary to save civilization. But capitalism’s dangerous tendencies remained and, once freed from the challenge of socialism, its utopian dogma was again ascendant. The inevitable crisis is now here.

Share

No Place To Hide 0

The snaring economy wants to shadow you like a cheap detective.

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Image of the globe with a giant screw labeled

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Ryan’s Derp, If You Do Get Sick, Die Quickly Dept. 0

TPM tries to figure out how many persons will lose health coverage under Paul Ryan’s plan to repeal the ACA. It’s not pretty.

Chart showing how many persons in each state would lose healthcare if the ACA is repealed.  Total is 23, 134,000 persons.

Click to see the image at its original location., along with the accompanying article.

The Republican Party: The Party of Mean for the Sake of Mean.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

“Border-line demented” twits.

Share

Jobs Con Job 0

Share

Reindeer Games 0

Rekha Basu takes a fresh look at the tale of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer.

Everyone loves the story of this little reindeer with a feature that makes him different. We don’t know why he has that flourescent red nose; maybe a birth defect or an electrical shock. Maybe a Christmas light got permanently wedged under his nostrils while he was a reindeer baby. Anyway, it sets him apart from all his reindeer friends, with their cookie-cutter noses. But let’s be clear: They’re no friends. They ridicule Rudolph because he’s different, and because they’re a bunch of snot-nosed conformists who think that makes them better.

In fairness, they probably never met another a reindeer that looked different. Maybe their parents raised them to fear differences, and so they tried to compensate by heckling the different one and never got corrected.

Share

The Blue Card: “Don’t Leave Home without It” 0

Image:  Cop holding up card that says,


Click to see the original image.

Share

QOTD 0

Raymond Chandler:

The flood of print has turned reading into a process of gulping rather than savoring.

Afterthought:

I wonder what he would say about twits and the Zuckerborg.

Share

Break Time 0

Off to drink liberally.

Share

All That Was Old Is New Again 0

What the Booman said.

Share

Stolen Identity 2

John Cole skewers the hypocrites who are bleating about Democrats’ having to “end identity politics.” Here’s a teaser; follow the link for a magnificent, blistering rant (language).

What you mean when you say “identity politics” is you mean all those groups you want to systematically oppress try to stand up and defend themselves and it hurts your feelings because you can’t have your way.

Share

Hate on Parade 0

Share

The Legitimization 0

This is your child on Trump.

Share

Dr. Consiglieri’s Cabinet 0

White House with sign:  HELP WANTED for Cabinet Posts.  No experience necessary.  Must be filthy rich.  Yes-Men Preferred--or Hot Women

Will Bunch has more.

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.